You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 18, November 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Purpose and Limits to Professional Self-regulation

Cyril Chantler, MD, FRCP, FRCPCH, FMedSci; Rebecca Ashton, MSc

JAMA. 2009;302(18):2032-2033.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Trust me, I’m a doctor." In the United States and United Kingdom, a recent survey reports, more than 80% of the public does.1 According to the Cambridge moral philosopher O’Neill, "Each of us and every profession and every institution needs to be trusted."2 She questioned whether the new climate of accountability and regulation in society was improving trust in physicians. She suggested that new systems of accountability cannot only change but also distort the proper aims of professional practice; if society wants a culture of public service then professionals and public servants must in the end be free to serve the public rather than their paymasters.2 However, if physicians are to be trusted by the public they serve, they have to deserve to be trusted, and that is why medical professionalism matters.

A report on Doctors in Society prepared by the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: The Kings Fund, London, United Kingdom.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Shared Medical Regulation in a Time of Increasing Calls for Accountability and Transparency: Comparison of Recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom
Kirstyn Shaw, Christine K. Cassel, Carol Black, and Wendy Levinson
JAMA. 2009;302(18):2008-2014.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.