 |
 |

The Purpose and Limits to Professional Self-regulation
Cyril Chantler, MD, FRCP, FRCPCH, FMedSci;
Rebecca Ashton, MSc
JAMA. 2009;302(18):2032-2033.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Trust me, Im a doctor." In the United States and United Kingdom, a recent survey reports, more than 80% of the public does.1 According to the Cambridge moral philosopher ONeill, "Each of us and every profession and every institution needs to be trusted."2 She questioned whether the new climate of accountability and regulation in society was improving trust in physicians. She suggested that new systems of accountability cannot only change but also distort the proper aims of professional practice; if society wants a culture of public service then professionals and public servants must in the end be free to serve the public rather than their paymasters.2 However, if physicians are to be trusted by the public they serve, they have to deserve to be trusted, and that is why medical professionalism matters.
A report on Doctors in Society prepared by the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: The Kings Fund, London, United Kingdom.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Shared Medical Regulation in a Time of Increasing Calls for Accountability and Transparency: Comparison of Recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom
Kirstyn Shaw, Christine K. Cassel, Carol Black, and Wendy Levinson
JAMA. 2009;302(18):2008-2014.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|