You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Timsit and colleagues1 reported the results of a 2-by-2 factorial design for the prevention of extraluminal catheter colonization and subsequent infections. As the authors acknowledged, the validity of such design lies in the absence of interaction between the 2 interventions. In the "Methods" section, they stated that this assumption was confirmed by testing for interaction in the Cox model. However, they did not report the power of this test to rule out any possible interaction.

The authors reported a significant increase in the semiquantitative culture count from the skin around the insertion site among patients in the 7-day dressing change interval group compared with those in the 3-day dressing change interval group. This was observed despite half of the dressings containing antiseptic-impregnated sponges.

I remain uncertain whether the use of CHGIS would reduce CRIs as much as was reported if catheter dressings were changed every 3 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jean-Jacques Parienti, MD
parienti-jj@chu-caen.fr
Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research
Côte de Nacre University Hospital
Caen, France



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Less Frequent Dressing Changes for Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jean-François Timsit, Carole Schwebel, Lila Bouadma, Arnaud Geffroy, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Sebastian Pease, Marie-Christine Herault, Hakim Haouache, Silvia Calvino-Gunther, Brieuc Gestin, Laurence Armand-Lefevre, Véronique Leflon, Chantal Chaplain, Adel Benali, Adrien Francais, Christophe Adrie, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Marie Thuong, Xavier Arrault, Jacques Croize, Jean-Christophe Lucet, and for the Dressing Study Group
JAMA. 2009;301(12):1231-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections
Yong-Gang Lv, Hong-Lin Dong, and Ling Wang
JAMA. 2009;302(4):379.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections—Reply
Jean-François Timsit, Adrien Francais, and Jean-Christophe Lucet
JAMA. 2009;302(4):380.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.