You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Lv and colleagues address the potential danger of extending the dressing changes to 7 days in particular subpopulations with a higher risk of catheter colonization.1 The risk of catheter colonization did not significantly differ between 3-day and 7-day dressing changes in surgical patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.57) or in immunocompromised patients (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.26-3.21). Results were also similar for femoral catheter only (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97-2.02), jugular catheter only (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.45-1.21), subclavian catheter only (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.62-2.27), and radial catheter only (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.56-1.53). Blood cultures were not collected at the time of catheter insertion. The rate of dressing change was not different between the CHGIS and control groups (P = .10). The sponge may absorb secretion and increase dressing adhesion, but it should not play a major role in the CHGIS . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jean-François Timsit, MD, PhD
jftimsit@chu-grenoble.fr

Adrien Francais, MSc
University Joseph Fourier
Albert Boniot Institute
Grenoble, France

Jean-Christophe Lucet, MD, PhD
Infection Control Unit
Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital
Paris, France



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections
Yong-Gang Lv, Hong-Lin Dong, and Ling Wang
JAMA. 2009;302(4):379.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2009;302(4):379.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.