You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Neurology
 •Coma/ Vegetative State
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Psychosocial Issues
 •Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Controversies About Brain Death

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The 1968 JAMA article1 presenting criteria for brain death justly deserves to be considered a classic. However, while the article provided criteria for the diagnosis of irreversible coma, it did not offer a rationale for why these criteria should be diagnostic of the death of a human being.

The commentary by Dr Rosenberg2 did not mention the controversy over the status of patients diagnosed as brain dead, which has intensified over the last 20 years. Reflecting this controversy, the President's Council on Bioethics recently issued a white paper, "Controversies in the Determination of Death."3 Patients with brain death maintained on mechanical ventilation retain an array of vital functioning that makes it very difficult to give a coherent account of why they are dead.4

Forty years after the publication of the classic article, the consensus that brain death constitutes death of a human being has eroded. Although the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Franklin G. Miller, PhD
fmiller@nih.gov
Department of Bioethics
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Maryland

Robert D. Truog, MD
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Consciousness, Coma, and Brain Death—2009
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;301(11):1172-1174.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Definition of Irreversible Coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death
JAMA. 1968;205(6):337-340.
PDF  

RELATED LETTERS

Controversies About Brain Death
Thomas E. Finucane
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Avak Albert Howsepian
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death—Reply
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381-382.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.