 |
 |

Controversies About Brain Death
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The 1968 JAMA article1 presenting criteria for brain death justly deserves to be considered a classic. However, while the article provided criteria for the diagnosis of irreversible coma, it did not offer a rationale for why these criteria should be diagnostic of the death of a human being.
The commentary by Dr Rosenberg2 did not mention the controversy over the status of patients diagnosed as brain dead, which has intensified over the last 20 years. Reflecting this controversy, the President's Council on Bioethics recently issued a white paper, "Controversies in the Determination of Death."3 Patients with brain death maintained on mechanical ventilation retain an array of vital functioning that makes it very difficult to give a coherent account of why they are dead.4
Forty years after the publication of the classic article, the consensus that brain death constitutes death of a human being has eroded. Although the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Franklin G. Miller, PhD
fmiller@nih.gov Department of Bioethics National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland
Robert D. Truog, MD
Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Consciousness, Coma, and Brain Death—2009
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;301(11):1172-1174.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Definition of Irreversible Coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death
JAMA. 1968;205(6):337-340.
PDF
RELATED LETTERS
Controversies About Brain Death
Thomas E. Finucane
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Controversies About Brain Death
Avak Albert Howsepian
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Controversies About Brain Death—Reply
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381-382.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|