 |
 |

Controversies About Brain Death
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The review by Dr Rosenberg1 of the JAMA Classics article on the definition of brain death contains a number of sentences that I find unclear. He states, "Coma refers to the clinical state in which a patient is unarousable and does not respond to stimuli." In both coma and persistent vegetative state (PVS), the patient is unarousable, and in both there is usually reflex response to some stimuli. It is the presence of periods of wakefulness that distinguishes the 2 syndromes. He also states that "a meaningful and functional return to consciousness occurs with regularity from PVS. . . . " However, the Multi-Society Task Force reported that at 1 year only 7% of patients with traumatic causes and 1% of patients with nontraumatic causes of PVS had good recovery.2
Rosenberg takes functional neuroimaging of activity in the supplementary motor area and parahippocampal gyrus, parietal lobe, and lateral premotor cortex to . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Thomas E. Finucane, MD
tfinucan@jhmi.edu Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Baltimore, Maryland
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Consciousness, Coma, and Brain Death—2009
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;301(11):1172-1174.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Controversies About Brain Death
Franklin G. Miller and Robert D. Truog
JAMA. 2009;302(4):380-381.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Controversies About Brain Death
Avak Albert Howsepian
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Controversies About Brain Death—Reply
Roger N. Rosenberg
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381-382.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|