You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Health Care Information Technology, Hospital Responsibilities, and Joint Commission Standards

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Commentary, Dr Koppel and Mr Kreda1 made clear the problems associated with applying the customs and traditions of business software contracting and sales (where "hold harmless" and "keep defects secret" clauses are commonplace) to health care information technology (HIT) as if they are the same. I believe that ignoring their differences has likely created an epidemic of violations of hospital governing body responsibilities and Joint Commission standards for health care organization leadership.

For example, Joint Commission leadership standard LD.01.03.012 states, "The governing body is ultimately accountable for the safety and quality of care, treatment, and services." The rationale for this standard states:

The governing body's ultimate responsibility for safety and quality derives from their legal responsibility and operational authority for [organization] performance. In this context, the governing body provides for internal structures and resources, including staff, that support safety and quality.2

Standard LD.03.04.012 states, "The . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Scot Silverstein, MD
scot.silverstein@ischool.drexel.edu
College of Information Science and Technology
Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Health Care Information Technology Vendors' "Hold Harmless" Clause: Implications for Patients and Clinicians
Ross Koppel and David Kreda
JAMA. 2009;301(12):1276-1278.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Health Care Information Technology, Hospital Responsibilities, and Joint Commission Standards—Reply
Ross Koppel and David A. Kreda
JAMA. 2009;302(4):382-383.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neonatal Informatics--Dream of a Paperless NICU: Part One: The Emergence of Neonatal Informatics
Drummond
NeoReviews 2009;10:e480-e487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.