 |
 |

Identifying and Improving Quality of Care
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their Commentary, Drs Werner and McNutt1 addressed strategies to improve quality, considering the balance of internal quality projects vs external monitoring. However, they did not clarify the very useful distinction between selection data and quality improvement data.
Berwick et al2 noted the necessity of external selection data for a variety of uses. At the same time, internal quality improvement measures are essential to the learning organization. This distinction is increasingly vivid because the public expects data for quality monitoring.3 It is helpful for clinicians to understand that some metrics are for selection, some metrics are for quality measurement, and the roles of some metrics will vary.
Financial Disclosures: Dr Schumacher reported being president of the Rockburn Institute, a health services research and consulting organization; clinical informatics officer for Crozer-Keystone Health System; external quality compliance officer for Long Island Health Network; consultant for Bon Secours Health System; . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Dale N. Schumacher, MD, MPH
dsrockinst@aol.com Rockburn Institute Elkridge, Maryland
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
A New Strategy to Improve Quality: Rewarding Actions Rather Than Measures
Rachel M. Werner and Robert McNutt
JAMA. 2009;301(13):1375-1377.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Identifying and Improving Quality of Care—Reply
Rachel M. Werner and Robert A. McNutt
JAMA. 2009;302(4):383.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|