You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Neurology
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Behavioral Neurology
 •Cognitive Disorders
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers

Potentially Yes for Clinical Trials but Not Yet for Clinical Practice

Ronald C. Petersen, PhD, MD; John Q. Trojanowski, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2009;302(4):436-437.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Research in Alzheimer disease (AD) is rapidly moving toward the point of the earliest possible identification of the underlying disease processes. These include the accumulation of Aβ plaques, tau tangles, and neuron as well as synaptic loss, and it is likely that these do not all occur contemporaneously. Many investigators contend that, by the time the clinical symptoms appear, sufficient AD pathology and neurodegeneration have occurred, which if irreversible, may reduce the efficacy of disease-modifying therapy for clinically manifest AD.1 As such, efforts are under way to try to identify the onset of these pathological processes that culminate in clinically manifest AD dementia. However, to accomplish this, the underlying pathology must be detected, possibly through the use of neuroimaging and chemical biomarker measures. In this issue of JAMA, Mattsson and colleagues2 report their evaluation of the utility of cerebrospinal . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Alzheimer's Disease Research, Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Petersen); and Institute on Aging, Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr Trojanowski).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Niklas Mattsson, Henrik Zetterberg, Oskar Hansson, Niels Andreasen, Lucilla Parnetti, Michael Jonsson, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Marinus A. Blankenstein, Michael Ewers, Kenneth Rich, Elmar Kaiser, Marcel Verbeek, Magda Tsolaki, Ezra Mulugeta, Erik Rosén, Dag Aarsland, Pieter Jelle Visser, Johannes Schröder, Jan Marcusson, Mony de Leon, Harald Hampel, Philip Scheltens, Tuula Pirttilä, Anders Wallin, Maria Eriksdotter Jönhagen, Lennart Minthon, Bengt Winblad, and Kaj Blennow
JAMA. 2009;302(4):385-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CSF Biomarkers and AD Prediction
JWatch Neurology 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.