You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 5, August 5, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Psychosocial Issues
 •Public Health, Other
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Violence and Human Rights, Other
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preventing Intimate Partner Violence

Screening Is Not Enough

Kathryn E. Moracco, PhD, MPH; Thomas B. Cole, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2009;302(5):568-570.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Physical, sexual, and psychological abuse of women by their intimate partners is common around the world.1 In response to this widespread public health problem, organizations of health care professionals, including the American Medical Association2 and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists3 recommend that all adult female patients be asked routinely about abuse, regardless of their presenting symptoms. However, evidence-based guides to clinical preventive services, such as the US Preventive Services Task Force4 and the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care,5 have concluded that there is insufficient evidence of health benefits to abuse survivors to recommend for or against screening for intimate partner violence (IPV), primarily due to methodological weaknesses of available studies.

In this issue of JAMA, MacMillan et al6 address this lack of evidence in the report of a trial that randomized women presenting for care . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Moracco). Dr Cole is Contributing Editor, JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Health Care Settings: A Randomized Trial
Harriet L. MacMillan, C. Nadine Wathen, Ellen Jamieson, Michael H. Boyle, Harry S. Shannon, Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, Andrew Worster, Barbara Lent, Jeffrey H. Coben, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Louise-Anne McNutt, and for the McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group
JAMA. 2009;302(5):493-501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence--Reply
MacMillan et al.
JAMA 2009;302:2434-2435.
FULL TEXT  

Does It Matter Whether We Ask About Intimate Partner Violence?
JWatch Women's Health 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.