You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 6, August 12, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pain
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Diagnosis
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Phan and colleagues1 presented 2 interesting patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms, speculating that for one patient the symptoms were due to microvascular coronary dysfunction and, for the other, due to abnormal cardiac nociception. I do not believe they have justified their conclusion that both patients illustrate the value of coronary reactivity testing. Indeed, the details of their diagnostic investigations are a reminder of the old saw that a well person is one who has not been completely worked up.2

The first patient, with cardiac syndrome X, had already had a negative radionuclide perfusion stress test (usually positive in this syndrome3) and 2 normal coronary angiograms before commencing the workup discussed by the authors, which included repeat coronary angiography and insertion of an intracoronary flow wire followed by intracoronary infusion of vasoactive agents. The authors dismissed the negative stress test as reflecting the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Steven W. Seiden, MD
stevens@southshoreheart.com
Division of Cardiology
South Nassau Communities Hospital
Oceanside, New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;301(14):1468-1474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
John F. Beltrame and Peter Ganz
JAMA. 2009;302(6):622-623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease—Reply
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;302(6):623-624.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.