 |
 |

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Phan and colleagues1 presented 2 interesting patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms, speculating that for one patient the symptoms were due to microvascular coronary dysfunction and, for the other, due to abnormal cardiac nociception. I do not believe they have justified their conclusion that both patients illustrate the value of coronary reactivity testing. Indeed, the details of their diagnostic investigations are a reminder of the old saw that a well person is one who has not been completely worked up.2
The first patient, with cardiac syndrome X, had already had a negative radionuclide perfusion stress test (usually positive in this syndrome3) and 2 normal coronary angiograms before commencing the workup discussed by the authors, which included repeat coronary angiography and insertion of an intracoronary flow wire followed by intracoronary infusion of vasoactive agents. The authors dismissed the negative stress test as reflecting the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Steven W. Seiden, MD
stevens@southshoreheart.com Division of Cardiology South Nassau Communities Hospital Oceanside, New York
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;301(14):1468-1474.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
John F. Beltrame and Peter Ganz
JAMA. 2009;302(6):622-623.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease—Reply
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;302(6):623-624.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|