You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 6, August 12, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pain
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Diagnosis
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Phan and colleagues1 summarized the evaluation and management of patients with persistent chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This review did not include the coronary slow flow phenomenon, although the first patient described in the article exhibited many of its characteristics. The importance of properly diagnosing the coronary slow flow phenomenon relates to (1) its prompt identification from routine diagnostic angiography, without the need for additional invasive testing; (2) its well-documented clinical features and prognosis; and (3) potentially effective therapy established in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

The coronary slow flow phenomenon is defined by a delayed opacification of the distal coronary vasculature during coronary angiography in the absence of obstructive CAD or coronary ectasia. This slow passage of contrast was initially considered an angiographic curiosity, but characterization of the associated clinical characteristics and prognosis2 have led some investigators to propose that it . . . [Full Text of this Article]

John F. Beltrame, BSc, BMBS
john.beltrame@adelaide.edu.au
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, Australia

Peter Ganz, MD
University of California, San Francisco



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;301(14):1468-1474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Steven W. Seiden
JAMA. 2009;302(6):622.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Patients With Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease—Reply
Anita Phan, Chrisandra Shufelt, and C. Noel Bairey Merz
JAMA. 2009;302(6):623-624.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.