You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 8, August 26, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prevalence of Breast Carcinoma In Situ in the United States

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Breast carcinoma in situ (BCIS) comprises 20% of new breast cancer diagnoses, with 2 predominant histologic forms: ductal (DCIS) and lobular (LCIS).1 Women with DCIS often undergo treatment similar to that of women with localized invasive cancer and experience similar reductions in quality of life.2 Women diagnosed with either DCIS or LCIS are approximately 4 times more likely to develop invasive breast cancer compared with the general population.3 The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute reports that there were 2.5 million survivors of invasive breast cancer alive in the United States in 2005,1 but we are aware of no published estimates of BCIS prevalence.

Methods

The prevalence of BCIS on January 1, 2005, was estimated by applying age- and race-specific prevalence proportions from the SEER 9 registries to the US population.4 Individual SEER registries determined and reported race classifications. The counting method . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Brian L. Sprague, MS
bsprague@wisc.edu

Amy Trentham-Dietz, PhD
Department of Population Health Sciences
University of Wisconsin-Madison



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.