You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 9, September 2, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physician Certification and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: For ICD implants, electrophysiologists are currently described as the specialists. Electrophysiologists may generally have superior catheter skills and have a higher success rate placing transvenous left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization-capable devices (a minority of implants). It appears that thoracic surgeons are relegated to fixing implant complications (removing infected devices, managing cardiac perforations) and performing the more difficult primary implants: subpectoral implant in cachectic patients, subcutaneous implant in morbidly obese patients, and implants in patients with complex anatomy who have failed initial attempt by an electrophysiologist.

It is therefore not surprising that in the study by Dr Curtis and colleagues,1 the small numbers of primary implants done by thoracic surgeons in recent years had a higher complication rate. As noted here, these are the more difficult patients. Subpectoral implants are particularly prone to pocket bleeding.

The study is also notable for reporting only in-hospital complications. Most infections . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Scott D. Lick, MD
slick@utmb.edu

Andras C. Kollar, MD; Vincent R. Conti, MD
Department of Surgery
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Jeptha P. Curtis, Jeffrey J. Luebbert, Yongfei Wang, Saif S. Rathore, Jersey Chen, Paul A. Heidenreich, Stephen C. Hammill, Rachel I. Lampert, and Harlan M. Krumholz
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1661-1670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Physician Certification and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Jalal K. Ghali and Theodore L. Schreiber
JAMA. 2009;302(9):941.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Certification and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Jeff Whittle
JAMA. 2009;302(9):942.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Certification and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators—Reply
Jeptha P. Curtis, Jeffrey Luebbert, and Harlan M. Krumholz
JAMA. 2009;302(9):942-943.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Certification and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators—Reply
James Coromilas
JAMA. 2009;302(9):943.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.