You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 11, March 17, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (70)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Perceived Risks of Heart Disease and Cancer Among Cigarette Smokers

John Z. Ayanian, MD, MPP; Paul D. Cleary, PhD

JAMA. 1999;281:1019-1021.

ABSTRACT

Context  Cigarette smoking causes more preventable deaths from cardiovascular disease and cancer than any other modifiable risk factor, but smokers may discount the increased personal risk they face from continued smoking.

Objective  To assess smokers' perceptions of their risks of heart disease and cancer.

Design and Setting  Telephone and self-administered survey in 1995 of a probability sample of US households with telephones.

Participants  A total of 3031 adults aged 25 to 74 years, including 737 current smokers (24.3%).

Main Outcome Measures  Respondents with no history of myocardial infarction (MI) (96.2%) or cancer (92.9%) assessed their risk of these conditions relative to other people of the same age and sex. Among current smokers, perceived risks were analyzed by demographic and clinical factors using logistic regression.

Results  Only 29% and 40% of current smokers believed they have a higher-than-average risk of MI or cancer, respectively, and only 39% and 49% of heavy smokers (>=40 cigarettes per day) acknowledged these risks. Even among smokers with hypertension, angina, or a family history of MI, 48%, 49%, and 39%, respectively, perceived their risk of MI as higher than average. In multivariate analyses, older (>=65 years), less educated (< high school graduate), and light smokers (1-19 cigarettes per day) were less likely than younger, more educated, and heavy smokers to perceive an increased personal risk of MI or cancer.

Conclusions  Most smokers do not view themselves at increased risk of heart disease or cancer. As part of multifaceted approaches to smoking cessation, physicians and public health professionals should identify and educate smokers who are not aware of smoking-related health risks.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Cigarette smoking causes more preventable deaths from cardiovascular disease and cancer than any other modifiable risk factor.1-3 Smokers who quit reduce their risk of these conditions and prolong their lives substantially,4 but approximately 48 million US adults continue to smoke.5 Many smokers may discount the increased personal risk they face from continued smoking,2 thereby demonstrating an "optimistic bias."6 Physicians' advice may help smokers assess their personal health risks more realistically, but many smokers have not received such advice.7-8 Improving smokers' awareness of their personal health risks may be useful to promote smoking cessation,9-11 so we analyzed smokers' perceptions of their relative risk of experiencing a myocardial infarction (MI) and cancer in a nationally representative survey.12


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Data Collection

Following approval of the study protocol by the Human Studies Committee of Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, interviewers from a professional survey firm dialed an equal probability sample of telephone numbers in the United States during 1995 to identify residential households. Within each household, 1 English-speaking respondent was selected to achieve prespecified sampling targets defined by sex and 10-year age intervals from 25 to 74 years. Eligible respondents were offered a stipend to complete a telephone interview and a subsequent written questionnaire, both of which provided data for this study. Interviews were completed by 3487 eligible individuals (response rate, 70%), with no evidence of response bias, using 1990 US Census data for each telephone exchange. The written questionnaire was completed by 3031 respondents (87%), yielding an overall response rate of 61%.

Participants were asked if they smoked cigarettes regularly and the maximum daily number of cigarettes they had ever smoked. Individuals with no history of MI (n = 2917, 96.2% of sample) or cancer (n = 2815, 92.9% of sample) were asked, "Do you think your risk of a heart attack (or cancer) is higher, lower, or about the same as other (men/women) your age?"13

Data Analysis

We weighted the data to adjust for probabilities of reaching households within each telephone exchange, sampling subjects within each household, and obtaining completed telephone interviews and questionnaires from designated subjects.14 We also used the Current Population Survey (October 1995) to calculate poststratification weights so our cohort who completed both the telephone interview and written questionnaire approximates the distribution of US adults aged 25-74 years by region, metropolitan area, sex, race, age, education, and marital status.

Characteristics of current smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers were compared using analysis of variance for age and the Pearson {chi}2 test for other variables. These other variables included sex, race, education, marital status, geographic region, having a regular physician, receiving a checkup in the past year, history of MI in a parent or sibling, hypertension, angina, overall physical and mental health, control over life, and satisfaction with life. In a multivariate analysis of current smokers that adjusted for these variables, we used logistic regression to assess the relative odds of perceiving higher-than-average risks of MI and cancer. SUDAAN statistical software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) was used to calculate SEs with the complex sampling design.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Of the 3031 respondents completing the telephone and self-administered surveys, 737 (24.3%, similar to the 25.5% reported in the 1994 National Health Interview Survey5) were current smokers and 868 (28.6%) were former smokers. Current smokers were younger and included a higher proportion of women than former smokers and were younger and included a higher proportion of men than nonsmokers (Table 1). Current smokers were less likely to be married or have graduated from high school than former smokers or nonsmokers. Current smokers were less likely to have a regular physician or have had a checkup in the past year, despite reporting worse physical and mental health. Current smokers also reported less control over life and less satisfaction with life than former smokers or nonsmokers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Characteristics of Survey Respondents by Smoking Status*


Among current smokers, only 29% and 40% perceived their risk of MI or cancer, respectively, as higher than other persons of the same age and sex—approximately double the proportions of former smokers (15% and 18%, respectively) and nonsmokers (15% and 17%, respectively) with these perceptions. Among heavier smokers (>=40 cigarettes per day), only 39% and 49%, respectively, perceived themselves at increased personal risk of heart disease or cancer. Among smokers who also had hypertension, symptomatic angina, or a family history of MI, fewer than half perceived their risk of MI as higher than average (48%, 49%, and 39%, respectively).

In multivariate analyses (Table 2), smokers older than 64 years were less likely than younger smokers to perceive their risk of MI as higher than average. Smokers older than 44 years and those who had not graduated from high school were less likely than younger smokers and college graduates, respectively, to perceive an increased personal risk of cancer. Heavier smokers were more likely than lighter smokers to perceive an increased risk of MI and cancer, and smokers who reported fair or poor mental health were more likely to report an increased risk of cancer. Smokers' risk perceptions did not differ significantly by sex, race, marital status, geographic region, access to a regular physician, or receipt of a checkup in the prior year.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Perceptions of Increased Relative Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Cancer Among Current Smokers*



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Despite past efforts to educate smokers about their health risks, our nationally representative study demonstrates that most smokers—even heavy smokers and those with other cardiac risk factors—do not perceive themselves at increased risk of experiencing an MI or developing cancer. Consistent with prior studies of less-representative cohorts, many smokers continue to deny their own personal risks from smoking.15-20 Thus, as a foundation for smoking cessation efforts, physicians and health educators should assess smokers' risk perceptions and provide more intensive counseling to those who underestimate their personal health risks,21-22 particularly older and less-educated smokers. Although physician counseling remains a cost-effective method to promote smoking cessation,23-24 alternate strategies will be needed to help smokers who have greater difficulty quitting and motivate the one third of smokers who do not have access to a regular physician.

In interpreting our findings, we note 4 other points. First, questions about health risks were asked separately from questions about smoking, so responses represent overall risks of heart disease and cancer rather than risks attributable solely to smoking. Second, we assessed the risk of cancer in general rather than specific types of cancer. Third, although most smokers are at increased risk of heart disease and cancer, some smokers may have a lower relative risk based on their family history, diet, or physical activity. Fourth, future studies should compare the accuracy of smokers' relative and absolute risk perceptions and determine how these perceptions influence their success in quitting smoking.11, 20, 25

In conclusion, most adults who continue to smoke in the United States do not recognize or acknowledge an increased personal risk of heart disease or cancer. Because smoking remains the most important preventable cause of these diseases in the United States, physicians and public health professionals should educate smokers about their personal health risks as part of comprehensive efforts to promote smoking cessation.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Funding/Support: This study was funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development (available at http://midmac.med.harvard.edu/home.html).

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the members and associates of the research network (Orville Gilbert Brim, PhD, director) for their contributions to designing this survey; to Milan Chheda and Mannie Liu, PhD, for assistance with statistical programming; and to Arnold M. Epstein, MD, MA, Matthew H. Liang, MD, MPH, and Barbara J. McNeil, MD, PhD, for reviewing an early draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding Author and Reprints: John Z. Ayanian, MD, MPP, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: ayanian{at}hcp.med.harvard.edu).

Author Affiliations: Section on Health Services and Policy Research, Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr Ayanian), and the Department of Health Care Policy (Drs Ayanian and Cleary), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Dr Ayanian is a Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost—United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993;42:645-649. PUBMED
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1989. DHHS publication (CDC) 89-8411.
3. National Cancer Institute. Changes in Cigarette-Related Disease Risks and Their Implication for Prevention and Control. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1997. Smoking and Tobacco Control Series, No. 8. NIH publication 97-4213.
4. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1990. DHHS publication (CDC) 90-8416.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:588-590. PUBMED
6. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility: conclusions from a community-wide sample. J Behav Med. 1987;10:481-500. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physician and other health-care professional counseling of smokers to quit—United States, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993;42:854-857. PUBMED
8. Thorndike AN, Rigotti NA, Stafford RS, Singer DE. National patterns in the treatment of smokers by physicians. JAMA. 1998;279:604-608. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Leventhal H, Cleary PD. The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:370-405. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
10. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 1988;7:355-386. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Weinstein ND. Accuracy of smokers' risk perceptions. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:135-140. ISI | PUBMED
12. Marmot MG, Fuhrer R, Ettner SL, Marks NF, Bumpass LL, Ryff CD. Contribution of psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in health. Milbank Q. 1998;76:403-448. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
13. Avis NE, Smith KW, McKinlay JB. Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed? Am J Public Health. 1989;17:1608-1612.
14. Levy PS, Lemeshow S. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1991.
15. Leventhal H, Glynn K, Fleming R. Is the smoking decision an "informed choice"? effect of smoking risk factors on smoking beliefs. JAMA. 1987;257:3373-3376. ABSTRACT
16. Brownson RC, Jackson-Thompson J, Wilkerson JC, Davis JR, Owens NW, Fisher EB. Demographic and socioeconomic differences in beliefs about the health effects of smoking. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:99-103. FREE FULL TEXT
17. McCoy SB, Gibbons FX, Reis TJ, Gerrard M, Luus CA, Sufka AV. Perceptions of smoking risk as a function of smoking status. J Behav Med. 1992;15:469-488. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
18. Strecher VJ, Kreuter MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks? J Behav Med. 1995;18:45-54. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
19. Schoenbaum M. Do smokers understand the mortality effects of smoking? evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:755-759. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Gibbons FX, Eggleston TJ, Benthin AC. Cognitive reactions to smoking relapse: the reciprocal relation between dissonance and self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:184-195. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. The Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline Panel and Staff. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline. JAMA. 1996;275:1270-1280. ABSTRACT
22. Glynn TJ, Manley MW. How to Help Your Patients Stop Smoking: A National Cancer Institute Manual for Physicians. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1997. NIH publication 97-3064.
23. Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Oster G. The cost-effectiveness of counseling smokers to quit. JAMA. 1989;261:75-79. ABSTRACT
24. Cromwell J, Bartosch WJ, Fiore MC, Hasselblad V, Baker T. Cost-effectiveness of the clinical practice recommendations in the AHCPR guideline for smoking cessation. JAMA. 1997;278:1759-1766. ABSTRACT
25. Viscusi WK. Smoking: Making the Risky Decision. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992.

RELATED ARTICLE

March 17, 1999
JAMA. 1999;281(11):1053-1054.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Smoking too few cigarettes to be at risk? Smokers' perceptions of risk and risk denial, a French survey
Peretti-Watel et al.
Tobacco Control 2007;16:351-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlates of Repeat and Recent Mammography for Women Ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003).
Rakowski et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2093-2101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Hammond et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:iii19-iii25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Siahpush et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:iii65-iii70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thinking Through Cancer Risk: Characterizing Smokers' Process of Risk Determination
Hay et al.
Qual Health Res 2005;15:1074-1085.
ABSTRACT  

Patients' Resistance to Risk Information in Genetic Counseling for BRCA1/2
Gurmankin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:523-529.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk
Weinstein et al.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:55-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The fallacy of "light" cigarettes
Rigotti and Tindle
BMJ 2004;328:E278-E279.
FULL TEXT  

Current Research Promises and Challenges in Behavioral Oncology: Report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology Annual Meeting, 2002
Miller et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:171-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the smoking behaviour and attitudes of smokers who believe they have smoking-related problems with those who do not
Coleman et al.
Fam Pract 2003;20:520-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal: By W Kip Viscusi, University of Chicago Press, 2002, $27.50, 263 pp, ISBN 0-226-85747-6
Cummings
Tobacco Control 2003;12:111-112.
FULL TEXT  

Learning the relationship between smoking, drinking alcohol and the risk of esophageal cancer
Bonnin-Scaon et al.
Health Educ Res 2002;17:415-424.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recall of health warnings in smokeless tobacco ads
Truitt et al.
Tobacco Control 2002;11:ii59-63.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking
Cummings et al.
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i110-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence
Rigotti
NEJM 2002;346:506-512.
FULL TEXT  

A 36-Year-Old Woman Who Smokes Cigarettes
Rigotti
JAMA 2000;284:741-749.
FULL TEXT  

Warnings that tell the truth: breaking new ground in Canada
Mahood
Tobacco Control 1999;8:356-361.
FULL TEXT  

Perceptions of Health Risks by Cigarette Smokers
Gerace et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1722-1723.
FULL TEXT  

Perceived Risk of Heart Disease and Cancer Among Smokers
Journal Watch Cardiology 1999;1999:9-9.
FULL TEXT  

What Does It Mean to Understand a Risk? Evaluating Risk Comprehension
Weinstein
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999;1999:15-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.