You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  May 5, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  msJAMA
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Needlestick Injuries Among French Medical Students

Eric Rosenthal, MD; Christian Pradier, MD; Olivia Keita-Perse, MD; Jöelle Altare, MD; Pierre Dellamonica, MD; Jill-Patrice Cassuto, MD
Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine & Hematology (Drs Rosenthal, Altare, and Cassuto), Centre d'Information et de Soins de l'Immunodéficience Humaine, Archet 1 hôpital (Drs Pradier, Keita-Perse, and Dellamonica), Nice-Sophia Antipolis Université, Nice, France.

Corresponding Author: Dr Eric Rosenthal, Service de Médecin Interne II, Hôpital de l'Archet 1, 151 route de Saint Antoine de Ginestière, B.P. 3079, 06202 Nice Cedex 3, France (e-mail: GERCBT.CASSUTO{at}wanadoo.fr).

JAMA. 1999;281:1660.

Although the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through occupational exposures to blood has received considerable attention,1 relatively few studies have addressed blood exposure accidents (BEAs) among medical students.2-7 Guidelines for preventing needlestick injuries and administrating postneedlestick HIV prophylaxis are available,8 but these guidelines may be unfamiliar to medical students. This study investigates BEA exposure, BEA reporting, and use of universal precautions in a population of French medical students.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was administered to medical students in the fourth, fifth, and sixth years of training at Nice University, France. Students answered questions regarding the use of gloves, handling of sharps, and personal exposure to needlestick injuries (BEAs). Information on risk reduction behaviors, number of BEAs, BEA reporting, and BEA management was collected. Data were analysed with Epi-Info 6.04a and BMDP software.


Results

Of 237 registered students, 200 (84%) completed the questionnaire. The overall prevalence of BEA exposure was 24%, with 37% of sixth-year students reporting at least 1 BEA. The mean number of BEAs per student was 1.4. Wound suturing and arterial puncture for blood gas studies accounted for 58% and 20% of BEAs, respectively. The remaining 22% of the cases occurred during intramuscular (2 BEAs), intravenous (2) or lumbar (2 ) puncturing, and other procedures (5). Of students who recalled having experienced a BEA, 39% had reported the incident to hospital personnel. Students most frequently indicated their inability to influence the outcome (40%) as the reason for not reporting a BEA. Several students reported that they did not know whom to consult (20%) or had been advised against reporting (20%).

Only 19% of students reported never recapping needles and always using a sharps container (Table 1). The decision to wear gloves was influenced by the procedure; most students used gloves for suturing, but not for intradermal or intramuscular injections. Of the students, 87% reported having received no information about universal precautions or BEAs during rotations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table. Sampled Student Population Using Universal Precautions (UPs) for Needle Disposal and Gloving



Discussion

Studies from several countries have found the prevalence of BEAs in medical students to be similar to that reported here.2-7 In this study, adherence to the universal precautions of using gloves and disposing of sharps was poor, suggesting a need to more carefully educate students on safe practices.

Perhaps the most disquieting finding pertains to the reasons students frequently did not report BEAs. A surprising number of students cited their inability to influence the outcome as a chief reason for keeping silent. This pessimism is at odds with data showing that postexposure prophylaxis may result in substantial reduction in the risk of HIV transmission.9 Furthermore, our finding that many medical students may perceive that they are being dissuaded from reporting BEAs or do not know to whom they should report such incidents suggests that students need more occupational risk management training in medical student education.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

MSJAMA invites medical students to submit manuscripts for possible publication in future issues. We particularly welcome well-researched studies and essays on the following topics: international medical graduates in the US health care system, pain and chronic illness, new medical technologies, women in medicine, medical delivery during war, and the match process. Manuscripts should be less than 2000 words in length and formatted according to JAMA's Instruction for Authors. Submissions and questions should be directed to Editor, Jonathan H. Lin.


REFERENCES

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure to HIV-induced blood. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:929-933. PUBMED
2. Tereskerz P. Percutaneous injuries among medical students. Adv Exposure Prev. 1995;1:10-12.
3. De Vries B, Cossard YE. Needlestick injury in medical students. Med J Aust. 1994; 160:398-400.
4. O'Neill TM, Abbott AV, Radecki SE. Risk of needlesticks and occupational exposures among residents and medical students. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1451-1456. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Waterman J, Jankowski R, Madan I. Under-reporting of needlestick injuries by medical students. J Hosp Infect. 1994;26:149-150. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
6. Koenig S, Chu J. Medical student exposure to blood and infectious body fluids. Am J Infect Control. 1995;23:40-43. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
7. Resnic FS, Noerdlinger MA. Occupational exposure among medical students and house staff at a New York City medical center. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:75-80. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Update: provisional Public Health Service recommendations for chemoprophylaxis after occupational exposure to HIV. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:468-480. PUBMED
9. Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, et al. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:1485-1490.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sharps injuries among medical students
Varsou et al.
Occup Med (Lond) 2009;59:509-511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Underreporting on the Management of Occupational Bloodborne Exposures in a Dental Teaching Environment
Kotelchuck et al.
J Dent Educ 2004;68:614-622.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.