You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 5, February 3, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (96)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Antibiotics and Risk of Subsequent First-time Acute Myocardial Infarction

Christoph R. Meier, PhD, MSc; Laura E. Derby, DSc; Susan S. Jick, DSc; Catherine Vasilakis, MPH; Hershel Jick, MD

JAMA. 1999;281:427-431.

ABSTRACT

Context  Increasing evidence supports the hypothesis of a causal association between certain bacterial infections and increased risk of developing acute myocardial infarction. If such a causal association exists, subjects who used antibiotics active against the bacteria, regardless of indication, might be at lower risk of developing acute myocardial infarction than nonusers.

Objective  To determine whether previous use of antibiotics decreases the risk of developing a first-time acute myocardial infarction.

Design  Population-based case-control analysis.

Setting  The United Kingdom–based General Practice Research Database comprising 350 general practices.

Patients  A total of 3315 case patients aged 75 years or younger with a diagnosis of first-time acute myocardial infarction between 1992 and 1997 and 13,139 controls without myocardial infarction matched to cases for age, sex, general practice attended, and calendar time.

Main Outcome Measures  Use of antibiotics among those who did or did not have a first-time acute myocardial infarction.

Results  Cases were significantly less likely to have used tetracycline antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.90) or quinolones (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.95). No effect was found for previous use of macrolides (primarily erythromycin), sulfonamides, penicillins, or cephalosporins.

Conclusions  The findings from this large case-control analysis provide further, albeit indirect, evidence for an association between bacterial infections with organisms susceptible to tetracycline or quinolone antibiotics and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. These results of preliminary nature should stimulate more research to further explore the role of infections in the etiology of acute myocardial infarction.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

There is increasing evidence from observational studies1-6 and randomized clinical trials7-8 that certain bacterial infections may play a role in the etiology of coronary heart disease and subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In particular, Chlamydia pneumoniae, but also Helicobacter pylori and bacterial infections associated with periodontal diseases,9 have been related to an increased risk of developing AMI as well as thrombotic stroke.10

Such infections, particularly with C pneumoniae, have a high prevalence, and because they often have a mild or even asymptomatic clinical course,11-13 they may often be undiagnosed and untreated. If the causal relationship between bacterial infections and AMI indeed exists, the attributable risk of such untreated chronic infections in the etiology of ischemic heart disease might be substantial. Under the assumption that certain bacteria play a causal role in the etiology of AMI, it might be expected that subjects who have been treated—for whatever indication—with certain antibiotics that have antibacterial activity against such organisms are at lower risk of developing AMI than subjects who have not received such antibiotic treatment.

We conducted a case-control analysis to explore the effect of previous use of tetracycline, macrolide, sulfonamide, quinolone, penicillin, and cephalosporin antibiotics on the risk of developing subsequent first-time AMI.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

We conducted the study using data from more than 350 general practices in the United Kingdom. Computerized patient records from the United Kingdom include patient demographics, symptoms, diagnoses, referrals, hospitalizations, drug prescriptions (including route of administration, number of tablets, and dosage), and additional information (eg, height, weight, and smoking status). All information is recorded by general practitioners on an ongoing daily basis (replacing the former paper-based patient charts), regardless of any future research hypotheses. Anonymous copies of hospital discharge and referral letters are available for review and validation purposes on request. This large database, known as the General Practice Research Database (GPRD), encompasses approximately 3 million actively enrolled persons in the United Kingdom. This system, which has been extensively validated14-15 and described in detail elsewhere,16-17 has been the source for numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Case Selection and Validation

We identified all subjects who had a first-time diagnosis of AMI between January 1, 1992, and October 31, 1997 (by computer-recorded International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8] codes mapped onto Oxford Medical Information System [OXMIS] codes). We restricted the study to case patients who were 75 years or younger on the date of the diagnosis (index date) and free of clinical conditions potentially related to an increased risk of developing AMI; thus, all subjects with a history of ischemic heart disease, unexplained chest pain, cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, stroke, intermittent claudication, venous thromboembolism, chronic renal disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disorders, or cystic fibrosis were excluded. All cases had to be registered in the database for at least 3 years prior to the index date. Any information regarding antibiotic exposure was concealed when we reviewed computer records to identify potential cases. The computer-recorded diagnosis of AMI was verified for a random sample of 40 cases as well as for more than 400 cases in 3 previous studies18-20 by the presence of 2 or more of the following diagnostic criteria in the hospital discharge letter: characteristic cardiac pain, characteristic electrocardiogram results, characteristic serial cardiac enzyme levels, an arteriogram documenting a recent coronary occlusion, or fibrinolytic therapy. The computer-recorded AMI diagnosis was confirmed for a high percentage (>90%) of potential cases through these validation steps, and we therefore decided to include all potential cases who were initially identified by review of the computerized patient records.

Controls

For each case, we randomly selected 4 control subjects, matched to cases for age (same year of birth), sex, general practice attended, and calendar time (same index date). The same exclusion criteria as for cases (ie, circulatory or metabolic diseases predisposing for myocardial infarction as described herein) were applied to controls.

Exposure to Antibiotics

For each case and control, we assessed the exposure history for antibiotics in an arbitrarily chosen and predefined window of exactly 3 years preceding the index date. Based on this 3-year exposure history, all subjects were categorized into the following mutually exclusive categories: (1) no antibiotic use, (2) use of tetracyclines only, (3) use of macrolides only, (4) use of sulfonamides only, (5) use of quinolones only, (6) use of penicillins only, (7) use of cephalosporins only, or (8) use of any combination of antibiotics across these groups ("switchers").

Subjects who used antibiotics were further characterized according to the number of prescriptions for antibiotics in the 3 years prior to the index date (1 vs >=2 prescriptions). For subjects who used tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, or sulfonamides, we also assessed the dose per tablet. Subjects who took no more than 250 mg of tetracycline/oxytetracycline, 100 mg of doxycycline, 100 mg of minocycline, 250 mg of erythromycin, 250 mg of clarithromycin, 250 mg of azithromycin, 250 mg of ciprofloxacin, 200 mg of ofloxacin, 400 mg of norfloxacin, 480 mg of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, or 200 mg of trimethoprim per tablet were classified as users of a regular dosage, and those who received higher doses were classified as users of a high dosage.

We further assessed the indication for the use of antibiotics (where recorded) from the computerized patient histories. If subjects received more than 1 prescription for an antibiotic, the indication for the last prescription prior to the index date was recorded.

Analysis

We conducted a matched analysis (conditional logistic regression) using the software program SAS, Version 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Odds ratios (ORs) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P values are 2-tailed.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

We identified 3315 cases (74% male) and 13,139 matched controls (Table 1). The relative risk estimates of developing a first-time AMI in relation to previous use of various antibiotics are shown in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Characteristics of Cases and Controls in Relation to Risk of Developing AMI*



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Odds Ratios of Developing First-Time AMI in Relation to Use of Antibiotics in the 3 Years Preceding the Date of AMI*


Subjects who took tetracyclines on 1 or more occasions in the 3 years preceding the index date were at a significantly reduced risk of developing a first-time AMI compared with nonusers, which resulted in an OR of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55-0.90) after adjustment for smoking and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). Previous use of quinolones was also associated with a reduced risk of developing AMI (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.95). On the other hand, previous use of macrolides (adjusted OR, 0.93), sulfonamides (OR, 1.01), penicillins (OR, 0.94), or cephalosporins (OR, 0.90) did not differ significantly between cases and controls.

The results were consistent across age strata. Previous tetracycline use resulted in an OR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50-0.87) in men and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.52-1.50) in women compared with nonuse of any antibiotics. Current and past smoking (vs nonsmoking), and a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2 (vs <25 kg/m2) were independent risk factors for AMI, but they did not confound the association between antibiotic use and AMI. Current use of aspirin at the index date (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.89), longer-term estrogen replacement therapy of 10 or more prescriptions prior to the index date among women (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94), and the presence of an acute respiratory tract infection20 within 10 days prior to the index date (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.8-5.3) were all independently associated with either a decreased or an increased risk of AMI, but adjusting the analysis for these parameters in the multivariate regression model did not change the results. Further adjustment for the presence of an asthma diagnosis prior to the index date (yes or no) or the number of practice visits in the 3 years preceding the index date (1-4, 5-19, or >=20) also did not confound the association between antibiotic exposure and risk of AMI.

Use of a regular dosage or a high dosage of a tetracycline antibiotic resulted in adjusted relative risk estimates of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.30-1.53), respectively, compared with no antibiotic use. We could not stratify those taking quinolone because all case patients used regular dosages. There also was no suggestion of a substantial difference between those taking regular and high dosages of macrolides (OR, 0.97 and 0.85, respectively) or sulfonamides (OR, 1.01 and 0.94, respectively).

Further stratification of subjects taking antibiotics into those who received either 1 or 2 or more prescriptions prior to the index date resulted in similar relative risk estimates for all antibiotics but macrolides: the OR for 1 prescription was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.79-1.36) and for 2 or more prescriptions was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34-1.11), compared with no antibiotic use.

We also stratified the switcher group (ie, those who used >1 type of antibiotic in the 3 years preceding the index date) into those who took tetracyclines plus quinolones and those who took all other combinations of antibiotics, which supposedly have no effect on the risk of AMI. This additional stratification did not yield different results between these 2 groups.

The distribution of the various indications (ie, types of infections that led to antibiotic treatment) did not differ substantially between the antibiotic treatment groups. For all antibiotics but sulfonamides, respiratory tract infections accounted for approximately 40% to 50% of all prescriptions issued. For sulfonamides, this proportion was lower (approximately 20%); most prescriptions for sulfonamides were issued for urinary tract infections (approximately 50%). Within the various groups of antibiotics, the indications did not differ materially between cases and controls.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The findings of this large observational study indirectly support the hypothesis that certain chronic bacterial infections may play a role in the etiology of ischemic heart disease and that use of tetracyclines or quinolones for any indication might alter the course of such chronic infections and thereby reduce the risk of subsequent first-time AMI.

We explored the association between previous use of antibiotics and the risk of subsequent AMI because several observational studies previously reported a possible link between bacterial infections and subsequent coronary heart disease or AMI; however, these studies did not assess the exposure history of study subjects to antibiotics. Furthermore, 2 recent randomized clinical trials that were relatively small and must be considered preliminary reported that patients with AMI and elevated anti–C pneumoniae antibody titers had significantly lower recurrence and cardiac complication rates if they received post-AMI treatment with either azithromycin or roxithromycin compared with placebo-treated patients.7-8 Whereas these 2 randomized trials explored the effect of antibiotics on the follow-up of subjects after AMI, our analysis was designed to explore the effect of antibiotics on the risk of developing a first-time AMI in previously healthy subjects in the absence of apparent clinical risk factors for AMI. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind. The well-documented risk factors for AMI (eg, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking) do not account for all incident AMI cases; it has therefore been postulated that additional risk factors for AMI must exist. To test whether bacterial infections may be such an independent additional risk factor, we a priori restricted the study to subjects without cardiovascular or metabolic diseases predisposing for AMI because any effect of a newly hypothesized risk factor for AMI would most likely become apparent in this relatively healthy study population.

The findings for tetracyclines were more distinct in men than in women. However, most of the study population (74%) was men, and stratification into small subgroups can easily result in chance findings. The same holds true for quinolone use, for which the finding was based on only 8 cases and 62 controls.

The optimal antibiotic treatment for C pneumoniae infections has not been established yet in well-designed clinical trials; most treatment recommendations stem from anecdotal reports and in vitro studies.21-22 However, based on current treatment strategies,21 our findings of a reduced risk of developing AMI in subjects who had taken tetracyclines or quinolones, but not macrolides, sulfonamides, penicillins, or cephalosporins, would fit well with the hypothesis that respiratory tract infections with C pneumoniae may play a role in the etiology of ischemic heart disease.

Tetracyclines are considered first-line treatment for C pneumoniae infections.21 The newer macrolides (eg, azithromycin, clarithromycin) have substantial antibacterial activity against C pneumoniae.21 However, most macrolide use in this study (75%) was erythromycin, which has been reported to be of uncertain efficacy against C pneumoniae11, 21; this may explain the lack of an apparent macrolide effect in our study. Furthermore, 71% of cases who used macrolides used tablet doses of only 250 mg, which might be insufficient to eradicate C pneumoniae infections.21 There was a suggestion that the risk of AMI became lower with increasing exposure to macrolides (based on number of treatment courses), but this finding has to be interpreted cautiously because it could be a chance finding.

The effect of previous quinolone use on the risk of developing AMI also has to be interpreted with caution because it is based on a relatively small number of cases. However, quinolones do have antibacterial activity against C pneumoniae21-22 in vitro, but their efficacy in vivo has been rather poorly established as yet. The lack of an effect of sulfonamides and {beta}-lactam antibiotics would also not be unexpected because they are considered ineffective against C pneumoniae infections.21

Despite the fact that our findings fit well into the hypothesis of a causal role of bacterial infections (ie, particularly C pneumoniae) in the etiology of AMI,1-6 they need careful interpretation for the following reasons.

First, any observed effect of antibiotics on the risk of AMI is only an indirect marker for an etiologic role of bacterial infections. It is an association, but it does not prove the existence of a causal relationship. It is possible in theory that the tetracycline and quinolone effects were not due to antibiotic activity but to some different pharmacological mechanism.

Second, it is not possible to infer the involvement of particular bacteria in the etiology of AMI. Despite the fact that the findings differed across antibiotic groups and that the observed pattern would be consistent with the hypothesis of a causal role of C pneumoniae infections in the etiology of ischemic heart disease, we cannot rule out that bacteria other than C pneumoniae (or mixed infections) could be involved. We were not in a position to specifically identify subjects who had a history of C pneumoniae infections because serologic tests to detect anti-Chlamydia antibodies are not routinely done in general practice. Therefore, considerable misclassification could not be avoided, but an even stronger effect of tetracycline or quinolone antibiotics may have resulted if we were able to restrict the analysis to subjects who have been previously infected with C pneumoniae.

Third, confounding by socioeconomic status (SES) has been proposed as a possible reason for an increased positive C pneumoniae seroprevalence among patients with AMI (ie, subjects with a low SES have an increased risk for AMI and they also have more infections than subjects with higher SES). Socioeconomic status is difficult to define and measure; in an attempt to reduce the risk of confounding by SES (and geography), we matched cases to controls on the same general practice attended. Furthermore, we did not study the effect of infections in general, but the effect of different groups of antibiotics on the risk of AMI. Socioeconomic status would therefore confound our findings if tetracyclines and quinolones, but not other antibiotics, were particularly given to subjects with high SES, which seems to be unlikely. In addition, we adjusted the analysis for number of practice visits; the average number of practice visits in the 3 years preceding the index date was closely similar for both cases and controls and was independent of use of particular antibiotics. This indicates that accessibility to medical care (as a marker for SES) did not confound our findings.

Finally, we cannot completely exclude chance or unknown confounders or biases as an explanation for the findings of this observational study. However, by a priori exclusion of all cases and controls with documented clinical risk factors for AMI, we minimized the risk of possible confounding by cardiovascular diseases (eg, hypertension, congestive heart failure) or metabolic disturbances (eg, diabetes mellitus).

It is a strength of the study that we were in a position to not only compare subjects who had taken antibiotics with those who had not, but also to distinguish among different types of antibiotics with differing antibacterial activities. The fact that previous use of tetracyclines and quinolones (eg, not of {beta}-lactam antibiotics) was associated with a lower risk for AMI in our study population provides indirect evidence that infections with organisms susceptible to tetracycline antibiotics might be involved in the etiology of ischemic heart disease.

It must be emphasized that these observational findings should not be interpreted as suggesting that antibiotics should be given to patients to prevent AMI. These potentially important findings on the role of chronic infections in the etiology of AMI need further confirmation, particularly from large-scale prospective randomized trials.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Corresponding Author and Reprints: Christoph R. Meier, PhD, MSc, Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University Medical Center, 11 Muzzey St, Lexington, MA 02421 (e-mail: chrmeier{at}bu.edu).

Funding/Support: The Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program is supported in part by grants from Astra Hässle AB, Mölndal, Sweden; Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ; Boots Healthcare International, Nottingham, England; GlaxoWellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC; Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; RW Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, NJ; and Novartis Farmacéutica SA, Barcelona, Spain.

Acknowledgment: We thank the participating general practitioners for their excellent cooperation and Alan Dean, MBBS, and his team for their generous help.

Author Affiliations: Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University Medical Center, Lexington, Mass.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Saikku P, Leinonen M, Mattila K, et al. Serologic evidence of an association of a novel chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1988;2:983-986. ISI | PUBMED
2. Saikku P, Leinonen M, Tenkanen L, et al. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:273-278. ISI | PUBMED
3. Thom DH, Grayston JT, Siscovick DS, Wang S-P, Weiss NS, Daling JR. Association of prior infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae and angiographically demonstrated coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1992;268:68-72. ABSTRACT
4. Grayston JT. Chlamydia in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1993;87:1408-1409. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Danesh J, Collins R, Peto R. Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: is there a link? Lancet. 1997;350:430-436. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. Gupta S, Camm AJ. Chlamydia pneumoniae and coronary heart disease: coincidence, association, or causation? BMJ. 1997;314:1778-1779. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Gupta S, Leatham EW, Carrington D, Mendall MA, Kaski JC, Camm AJ. Elevated Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies, cardiovascular events, and azithromycin in male survivors of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:404-407. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Gurfinkel E, Bozovich G, Daroca A, Beck E, Mautner B. Randomised trial of roxithromycin in non-Q-wave coronary syndromes: ROXIS pilot study. Lancet. 1997;350:404-407. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
9. Mattila KJ, Nieminen MS, Valtonen VV, et al. Association between dental health and acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1989;298:779-781. ISI | PUBMED
10. Wimmer MLJ, Sandmann-Strupp R, Saikku P, Haberl RL. Association of chlamydial infection with cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1996;27:2207-2210. FREE FULL TEXT
11. Grayston JT, Kuo C, Wang S, Altman J. A new Chlamydia psittaci strain, TWAR, isolated in acute respiratory tract infections. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:161-168. ABSTRACT
12. Falck G, Heyman L, Gnarpe J, Gnarpe H. Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR): a common agent in acute bronchitis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26:179-187. ISI | PUBMED
13. Kauppinen M, Saikku P. Pneumonia due to Chlamydia pneumoniae: prevalence, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21(suppl):S244-S252.
14. Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 1991;302:766-768. ISI | PUBMED
15. Jick H, Terris BZ, Derby LE, Jick SS. Further validation of information recorded on a general practitioner based computerized data resource in the United Kingdom. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety. 1992;1:347-349. FULL TEXT
16. Walley T, Mantgani A. The UK General Practice Research Database. Lancet. 1997;350:1097-1099. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
17. Jick H. A database worth saving. Lancet. 1997;350:1045. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
18. Jick H, Derby LE, Gurewich V, Vasilakis C. The risk of myocardial infarction associated with antihypertensive drug treatment in persons with uncomplicated essential hypertension. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16:321-326. ISI | PUBMED
19. Jick H, Vasilakis C, Derby LE. Antihypertensive drugs and fatal myocardial infarction in persons with uncomplicated hypertension. Epidemiology. 1997;8:446-448. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
20. Meier CR, Jick SS, Derby LE, Vasilakis C, Jick H. Acute respiratory tract infections and risk of first-time acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1998;351:1467-1471. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Hammerschlag MR. Antimicrobial susceptibility and therapy of infections caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1873-1878. FREE FULL TEXT
22. Hammerschlag MR, Qumei KK, Roblin PM. In vitro activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, L-ofloxacin, and other antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1573-1574. FREE FULL TEXT

RELATED ARTICLES

Antibiotics for Prevention of Myocardial Infarction? Not Yet!
Aaron R. Folsom
JAMA. 1999;281(5):461-462.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

February 3, 1999
JAMA. 1999;281(5):481-482.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antibiotic Use and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis
Alonso et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:997-1002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discontinuation of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Therapy and Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Fischer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2472-2476.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotics for the Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Wells et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2156-2161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Biochemical Results of the Metalloproteinase Inhibition with Subantimicrobial Doses of Doxycycline to Prevent Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) Pilot Trial
Brown et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2004;24:733-738.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inflammation and Infections as Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke
Lindsberg and Grau
Stroke 2003;34:2518-2532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atherogenic effects of Chlamydia pneumoniae: refuting the innocent bystander hypothesis
Selzman et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003;126:688-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotics in Primary Prevention of Stroke in the Elderly
Brassard et al.
Stroke 2003;34 :e163-e166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Antibiotics Is Not Associated With Decreased Risk of Myocardial Infarction Among Patients With Diabetes
Karter et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2100-2106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality and Cancer Incidence Among Individuals With Down Syndrome
Hill et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:705-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of fluorquinolones is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients
Erkens et al.
Eur Heart J 2002;23:1575-1579.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intracellular Action of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Accounts for Acute Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury
Wang et al.
Circulation 2002;106:1543-1549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A role for glycoprotein Ib in Streptococcus sanguis-induced platelet aggregation
Kerrigan et al.
Blood 2002;100:509-516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Taking oral health to heart: An overview
CIANCIO
Journal of the American Dental Association 2002;133:4S-6S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia pneumoniae Seropositivity Is Associated With Increased Plasma Levels of Soluble Cellular Adhesion Molecules in Community-Dwelling Subjects: The Shimanami Health Promoting Program (J-SHIPP) Study
Kohara et al.
Stroke 2002;33:1474-1479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stroke Prevention Therapy Beyond Antithrombotics: Unifying Mechanisms in Ischemic Stroke Pathogenesis and Implications for Therapy: An Invited Review
Gorelick
Stroke 2002;33:862-875.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doxycycline Modulates Smooth Muscle Cell Growth, Migration, and Matrix Remodeling after Arterial Injury
Bendeck et al.
Am. J. Pathol. 2002;160:1089-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association Between Influenza Vaccination and Reduced Risk of Brain Infarction
Lavallee et al.
Stroke 2002;33:513-518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia pneumoniae and Atherosclerosis: Critical Assessment of Diagnostic Methods and Relevance to Treatment Studies
Boman and Hammerschlag
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002;15:1-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection in Circulating Human Monocytes Is Refractory to Antibiotic Treatment
Gieffers et al.
Circulation 2001;103:351-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia pneumoniae Proteins Induce Secretion of the 92-kDa Gelatinase by Human Monocyte- Derived Macrophages
Vehmaan-Kreula et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2001;21 :e1-e8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prior Antibiotic Use
Herings et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2998-2999.
FULL TEXT  

Unstable atherosclerotic plaques contain T-cells that respond to Chlamydia pneumoniae
de Boer et al.
Cardiovasc Res 2000;48:402-408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microorganisms in the aetiology of atherosclerosis
Morre et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2000;53:647-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Respiratory infection and coronary heart disease: progression of a paradigm
GRIMES et al.
QJM 2000;93:375-383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Contributes to Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Heart
Cheung et al.
Circulation 2000;101:1833-1839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are All Diseases Infectious? Another Look
Lorber
ANN INTERN MED 1999;131:989-990.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Use and Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Haider et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1997-1999.
FULL TEXT  

Does Chlamydia pneumoniae Cause Atherosclerosis?
Grayston
Arch Surg 1999;134:930-934.
FULL TEXT  

Antimicrobial therapy for Chlamydia pneumoniae: its potential role in atherosclerosis and asthma
Cook
J Antimicrob Chemother 1999;44:145-148.
FULL TEXT  

Can Antibiotics Prevent Heart Attacks?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 1999;1999:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Certain Antibiotics Lower Risk of MI
JWatch Emergency Med. 1999;1999:10-10.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Use Associated with Reduced MI Risk
Journal Watch Dermatology 1999;1999:16-16.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Use Associated with Reduced MI Risk
JWatch General 1999;1999:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotics for Prevention of Myocardial Infarction? Not Yet!
Folsom
JAMA 1999;281:461-462.
FULL TEXT  

From the Cover: Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999
Manton and Gu
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001;98:6354-6359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.