 |
|
Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Pediatric Inpatients
Rainu Kaushal, MD,MPH;
David W. Bates, MD,MSc;
Christopher Landrigan, MD,MPH;
Kathryn J. McKenna, MS,RN;
Margaret D. Clapp, RPh;
Frank Federico, RPh;
Donald A. Goldmann, MD
JAMA. 2001;285:2114-2120.
ABSTRACT
| |
Context Iatrogenic injuries, including medication errors, are an important problem in all hospitalized populations. However, few epidemiological data are available regarding medication errors in the pediatric inpatient setting.
Objectives To assess the rates of medication errors, adverse drug events (ADEs), and potential ADEs; to compare pediatric rates with previously reported adult rates; to analyze the major types of errors; and to evaluate the potential impact of prevention strategies.
Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective cohort study of 1120 patients admitted to 2 academic institutions during 6 weeks in April and May of 1999.
Main Outcome Measures Medication errors, potential ADEs, and ADEs were identified by clinical staff reports and review of medication order sheets, medication administration records, and patient charts.
Results We reviewed 10 778 medication orders and found 616 medication errors (5.7%), 115 potential ADEs (1.1%), and 26 ADEs (0.24%). Of the 26 ADEs, 5 (19%) were preventable. While the preventable ADE rate was similar to that of a previous adult hospital study, the potential ADE rate was 3 times higher. The rate of potential ADEs was significantly higher in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit. Most potential ADEs occurred at the stage of drug ordering (79%) and involved incorrect dosing (34%), anti-infective drugs (28%), and intravenous medications (54%). Physician reviewers judged that computerized physician order entry could potentially have prevented 93% and ward-based clinical pharmacists 94% of potential ADEs.
Conclusions Medication errors are common in pediatric inpatient settings, and further efforts are needed to reduce them.
INTRODUCTION
Iatrogenic injuries occur frequently in hospitalized patients and often have serious sequelae.1 The Harvard Medical Practice Study estimated that 3.7% of hospitalized patients experienced an adverse event related to medical therapy in New York State in 1984.1 Of these iatrogenic injuries, 69% were preventable.2 A more recent study reached similar estimates.3 An Institute of Medicine report in 1999 estimated that 44 000 to 98 000 people die each year at least in part because of medical error.4 Although there has been some controversy about the accuracy of these extrapolated estimates,5-7 the report dramatically increased awareness of the problem of medical errors.
In the Harvard Medical Practice Study, the most common adverse events were complications of medication use (19.4% of all events).8 Thirty percent of patients with drug-related injuries died or were disabled for more than 6 months, although not all morbidity and mortality was directly attributable to these drug-related injuries.1 In response to these concerning findings, the Adverse Drug Event Prevention Study was performed, which addressed medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) in hospitalized adults in more detail.9-10 It found that ADEs were common (occurring at a rate of 6.5 per 100 adult admissions), costly, and often had severe sequelae.9, 11 Other studies largely confirmed these findings.12-13
Several studies suggest that about one third of ADEs are associated with medication errors and are thus preventable.9, 14 Bates et al15 found that medication errors were common, occurring at a rate of 5 per 100 medication orders. However, only 7 in 100 medication errors had significant potential for harm, and 1 in 100 actually resulted in an injury.15
Analysis of the origin of errors has suggested that specific improvements in the medication ordering and processing system might reduce the risk of error.10 Several studies have demonstrated that some of these interventions can be effective. In particular, physician computer order entry reduced medication errors significantly in an academic medical center,16 as did a dedicated clinical pharmacist in an academic intensive care unit (ICU).17 Similarly, a computerized clinical decision support program dramatically decreased antibiotic-associated medication errors and ADEs, as well as total costs for patients in an ICU.18
Less information is available regarding the epidemiology and prevention of medication errors and ADEs in pediatric inpatient settings.19 Children pose unique challenges to the system for ordering, dispensing, administering, and monitoring medications. For example, since weight-based dosing is needed for virtually all drugs in pediatrics, ordering medications typically involves more calculations than for adults. Dispensing drugs in pediatrics is also error-prone because pharmacists often must dilute stock solutions. Young children do not have the communication skills to warn clinicians about potential mistakes in administering medications, or about adverse effects that they may experience. Finally, all children, especially neonates, may have more limited internal reserves than adults with which to buffer errors. For example, the cardiovascular system of a premature baby may be unable to cope with even a small error in the dosage of an inotropic agent.
To assess the epidemiology of medication errors, potential ADEs, and ADEs in hospitalized children, we performed a prospective cohort study in 2 academic institutions. Our goals were to (1) determine the rates of medication errors, potential ADEs, and ADEs; (2) compare rates in a pediatric hospital setting with previously reported rates in adult hospitals; (3) analyze the major types of errors; and (4) assess the potential impact of prevention strategies.
METHODS
Study Sites
The study was conducted at 2 urban teaching hospitals with socioeconomically diverse patient populations. One hospital (hospital A) is a freestanding pediatric institution. The other hospital (hospital B) treats both adult and pediatric patients, but has a geographically and administratively distinct pediatric service. Adults comprise less than 5% of patients treated on the pediatric wards. They generally have complex long-term medical and surgical conditions, such as congenital diseases (eg, cystic fibrosis, cardiac anomalies, metabolic diseases, sickle cell disease), multiple disabilities, immunosuppressive conditions, and eating disorders.
At hospital A, we studied 2 randomly selected general medical wards, 1 randomly selected general surgical ward, the short-stay medical ward, and the pediatric medical/surgical ICU (which has few cardiac patients because there is a separate cardiac ICU). The oncology ward and neonatal ICU (NICU) were not studied at this hospital because these units were preparing for possible introduction of computerized order entry. At hospital B, all pediatric wards were studied, including the general medical/surgical wards (including oncology patients), the pediatric medical/surgical ICU, and the NICU. In total, we studied 9 wards. There were clear differences in case mix, as well as staffing, among individual wards of the 2 hospitals.
Medication Systems
Physicians at both hospitals currently handwrite orders, copies of which are sent to the pharmacy. At hospital A, nurses transcribe orders into the medication administration record (MAR). Hospital A has satellite-based pharmacists who dispense ready-to-administer doses to the floor, but do not actively participate in other activities, such as ward-based rounds.
At hospital B, clerks transcribe orders into the MAR. A supply of medications is provided to the units, with nurses subsequently performing dose calculations and drug administration. Pediatric clinical pharmacists attend work rounds, monitor transcriptions, and assist nurses with calculations. Since these pharmacists are assigned to multiple units daily, they have limited time to spend on each unit.
Definitions
Medication errors were defined as errors in drug ordering, transcribing, dispensing, administering, or monitoring. An example is an order written for amoxicillin without a route of administration. Some medication errors have significant potential for injuring a patient and are considered potential ADEs. Potential ADEs may be intercepted before reaching the patient. An example of an intercepted potential ADE would be an order written for a 10-fold overdose of morphine that is intercepted and corrected by a pharmacist before reaching the patient. A nonintercepted potential ADE would be an overdose of acetaminophen administered to a patient who does not experience any sequelae. ADEs are injuries that result from the use of a drug. Some ADEs are associated with a medication error and therefore are considered preventable, while some are not associated with a medication error and therefore are considered nonpreventable. An example of a preventable ADE is the development of rash after the administration of ampicillin/sulbactam to a patient known to be allergic to penicillin. In contrast, a nonpreventable ADE would be development of Clostridium difficile colitis after appropriate antibiotic use. Finally, rule violations are faulty medication orders with little potential for harm or extra work because nursing and pharmacy staff typically interpret them correctly without additional clarification. An example is a pain medication ordered on a per need basis for a postoperative patient without an explicit reason for administration stated. Rule violations were not considered medication errors.
Case Finding
One physician (R.K.) trained all data collectors, who were nurses, pharmacists, and physicians, in an identical manner. During the 2-week training period, the unique perspectives of these different disciplines were shared to maximize appreciation of potential error types and to develop a comprehensive, uniform approach to error detection. We determined inter-rater reliability by a random sampling of 10% of the data collected at each institution by a data collector from the other institution.
Data collectors identified medication errors, potential ADEs, and ADEs by voluntary and verbally solicited reports from house officers, nurses, and pharmacists; and by medication order sheet, MAR, and chart review of all hospitalized patients on study wards. On a given day, 1 data collector was assigned to each study ward based on individual availability. Data collected for each incident included name, dose, route and category of drug, point in the system where the error occurred, and type of error. Data collectors worked 5 days per week, with recording of weekend data on Mondays for patients still hospitalized. At the end of the study, we obtained administrative data for each patient hospitalized on the study wards, including age, sex, and race.
Reliable detection of medication errors requires cooperation and engagement of the staff, which depends in large measure on reducing suspicion and fear of reporting. Before initiating this study, we gained the support of the leadership of nursing, pharmacy, medical staff, and administration at each hospital. House staff, nurses, and pharmacists received informal seminars that emphasized the roles of complex systems and human factors in predisposing to error, as opposed to individual blame. We stressed the importance of understanding the epidemiology and causes of error, and reinforced the multidisciplinary nature of systems improvement. We performed the study over 6 weeks in April and May of 1999, after obtaining institutional review board approval at each institution.
Review Process
Two physicians (D.W.B. and D.A.G.) independently reviewed suspected ADEs and potential ADEs and classified them as ADEs, potential ADEs, medication errors, and rule violations. The physician reviewers rated ADEs and potential ADEs according to the severity of injury to the patient using a 4-point Likert scale. They also rated ADEs on preventability using a 5-point Likert scale and attribution (ie, the likelihood that the incident is due to the specific drug) using the Naranjo algorithm.20 The 2 evaluators resolved all disagreements through discussion and consensus.
Statistical Methods
We report rates of errors per 100 orders, 100 admissions, and 1000 patient-days. We did subanalyses of preventable and potential ADEs. We measured age-specific rates per 100 admissions, and analyzed them assuming that the number of errors occurring during an admission followed a Poisson distribution. We measured ward-specific rates per 100 orders and compared them using the  2 test for categorical variables since it was extremely rare for more than 1 error to occur during a single order. Similarly, we compared rates per 100 orders between adult and pediatric hospital settings and analyzed them using the 2 test. When we assumed that the number of errors per order followed a Poisson distribution, we obtained similar results, so we report only the 2 test results. The SAS statistical package (for Windows 6.12) was used (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
We calculated inter-rater reliabilities using the percentage of agreement and the  statistic. The data collectors and physician reviewers had moderate-to-excellent agreement with 87%-to-100% agreement and statistics of 0.65 to 1.0.
RESULTS
The 36-day study period included 1120 admissions and 3932 patient-days, during which 10 778 orders were written. The patients included 183 (16%) neonates, 326 (29%) infants, 223 (20%) preschoolers, 161 (14%) school-aged children, 191 (17%) teenagers, and 36 (3%) adults. Of the children, 525 (49%) were female, 731 (65%) were white, 139 (12%) were Hispanic, and 79 (7%) were black.
There were 616 medication errors (5.7%) or 55 medication errors per 100 admissions (Table 1). In total, 320 patients accounted for these medication errors and 64 patients had 3 or more errors. We found 26 ADEs (0.24%), of which 5 (19%) were preventable. In addition, we identified 115 potential ADEs (1.1%), which occurred at a rate of 10 potential ADEs per 100 admissions.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Rates of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events (ADEs)*
|
|
|
Medication errors occurred more frequently in adults compared with other age groups (86 vs 62 for neonates, 41 for infants, 48 for preschoolers, 58 for school-aged children, and 63 for teenagers per 100 admissions; P = .006). The rate of potential ADEs was considerably higher in neonates than in other age groups (20 vs 5 for infants, 8 for preschoolers, 12 for school-aged children, 11 for teenagers, and 14 for adults per 100 admissions; P<.001).
Given the high rate of neonatal potential ADEs, we performed a subanalysis comparing the 54 neonatal patients in the NICU with the 129 neonatal patients in other wards. The NICU neonates were primarily premature with low birth weights and respiratory and nutritional issues, while non-NICU neonates were primarily admitted for infections or congenital abnormalities. Neonates in the NICU experienced significantly higher medication error and potential ADE rates (91 and 46 per 100 admissions, respectively) than neonates in other wards (50 and 9 per 100 admissions, respectively) (P<.001 for both comparisons).
Error rates were similar across units (5.5 errors per 100 orders for the NICU, 5.7 for pediatric ICUs, 6.0 for medical wards, 6.1 for combined medical/surgical wards, and 4.7 for the surgical ward; P = .31). However, the NICU had a significantly higher rate of potential or preventable ADEs compared with other wards (2.8 per 100 orders vs 0.78 for medical wards, 0.44 for surgical wards, 0.77 for combined medical/surgical wards, and 1.3 for pediatric ICUs; P<.001).
Most medication errors were dosing errors (28%), followed by route of administration, MAR transcription and documentation, date, and frequency of administration errors (Table 2). Similarly, most potential ADEs were due to dosing errors (34%), followed by frequency and route errors. The most common stage for medication errors and potential ADEs was physician ordering (74% and 79%, respectively), followed by transcription and nurse administration. The most common drugs involved in medication errors and potential ADEs were anti-infective agents, analgesics and sedatives, electrolytes and fluids, and bronchodilators. The drug routes of medication errors and potential ADEs were most commonly intravenous followed by oral and inhalation.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Types of Medication Errors and Potential Prevention Strategies*
|
|
|
In addition, physician reviewers judged that 93% of the potential ADEs were potentially preventable by physician computer order entry with clinical decision support, 94% by ward-based clinical pharmacists, and none by computerized MAR. Finally, they judged that computerized physician order entry could have prevented 4 of the 5 preventable ADEs and that ward-based clinical pharmacists could have prevented 4 of the 5 preventable ADEs. For these judgments, the role of the clinical pharmacist included full-time participation in work rounds, monitoring the MAR transcription process, communicating with satellite pharmacies, and assisting nurses with medication dose calculation and administration.
During the study period, 26 ADEs were identified, 5 of which resulted from medication errors and thus were judged to be preventable (Table 3). The preventable ADEs included excessive sedation, hypothermia, worsening pain, a rash, and stool impaction. Errors associated with these 5 incidents included 2 overdoses, a missing dose, a drug administration error, and administration of a medication to a patient with a known allergy. Two events involved narcotics, 1 an analgesic, 1 an antibiotic, and 1 a laxative. The route of 2 medications was intravenous, 1 oral, 1 epidural, and 1 via suppository. Physician reviewers classified 4 of the preventable ADEs as serious and 1 as significant. Of the 21 nonpreventable ADEs, 14 were related to antibiotic use, including C difficile infections, rashes, allergic reactions, gastrointestinal tract distress, and a yeast infection. The remaining 7 were narcotic-related, including respiratory depression, sedation, and gastrointestinal tract and allergic reactions. Fifteen of the medications were administered intravenously, 5 orally, and 1 via epidural.
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and Potential ADEs
|
|
|
Of the 115 potential ADEs, 68 (59%) were intercepted while 47 (41%) were not (Table 3). The physician reviewers determined that 18 (16%) of the potential ADEs were potentially fatal or life-threatening, 52 (45%) were serious, and 45 (39%) were significant. Examples of potentially fatal or life-threatening intercepted potential ADEs included physician orders for a heparin overdose, a digoxin overdose, and amoxicillin for a patient with a previous anaphylactic reaction to penicillin. Among the most common errors associated with potential ADEs were physicians ordering inappropriately high or low does of medications, ordering medications despite known allergies, ordering medications without routes, and the pharmacy dispensing incorrect medications.
COMMENT
We found that medication errors were common in the inpatient pediatric setting. Potential ADEs occurred more frequently in neonates, particularly in the NICU. The rate of medication errors was higher in adults cared for in the pediatric hospital setting. Errors occurred most commonly at the stage of drug ordering. Dosing errors and errors involving the intravenous route were most frequent. The drug classes associated most frequently with errors were anti-infectives, electrolytes and fluids, and analgesics and sedatives. Most errors appeared to be preventable by physician computer order entry with clinical decision support or full-time, ward-based clinical pharmacists.
We compared the results of this study to a 1992 study using similar methods in an adult patient population (Table 4).15 In 1992, physicians at the adult hospital hand-wrote orders, clerks primarily transcribed orders to the MAR, and pharmacists were primarily satellite-based, with some ward-based involvement in the medical ICU. Both studies had similar rates of medication errors, ADEs, and preventable ADEs; however, the rate of potential ADEs was about 3 times higher in this pediatric study (1.1% vs 0.35%; P<.001). Inter-institutional comparisons can be difficult to standardize, although in this case 1 physician (D.W.B.) was involved in both studies.
|
|
|
|
Table 4. Comparison of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) in Pediatric and Adult Hospital Settings
|
|
|
Relatively little research has addressed the problem of medication errors and ADEs in pediatric inpatient settings. Reliable error detection requires intensive, comprehensive, and active ward-based data collection. We used a multidisciplinary approach that examined all aspects of the medication system, from the physician's order through administration of the drug to the patient. Moreover, we encouraged voluntary reporting by emphasizing the role of systems problems in the origin of errors and by nurturing a blame-free environment. In a previous pediatric study by Folli et al,19 errors were detected solely by pharmacist review of physician orders, and lower error rates of 0.45 to 0.49 per 100 orders were found. Although 74% of errors in our study occurred in drug orders, many of these errors were detected and corrected prior to the order reaching the pharmacy.
As expected, we found that the errors with potential for harm occurred most often in the youngest, most vulnerable patients cared for in the NICU. Neonatal weights change rapidly, making appropriate dosing particularly difficult. Moreover, medication errors in critically ill neonates may have more serious consequences compared with relatively healthy neonates or older children because they have limited ability to buffer errors. Pharmacists also face special challenges with neonatal drugs because medications generally are not supplied in dosages suitable for neonates and must be diluted.
The relatively small number of adult patients also had significantly higher medication error rates. This may be due to the typically high medical complexity of adult patients cared for in pediatric settings, or the lack of familiarity of pediatric house staff with adult dosing.
The high risk of medication errors highlights the importance of developing, testing, and implementing effective error-prevention strategies in pediatrics. Cogent theories regarding the origin of errors (often categorized as human factor research)21 have been developed. Most investigators have focused on problems in health care delivery systems that predispose to error, rather than emphasizing the role of individuals.22-26 Human fallibility is magnified substantially by complex and poorly designed systems, poor teamwork, and psychological and environmental stressors such as fatigue, anxiety, poor lighting, and noise. The safest work environments address these issues by designing systems to prevent errors, make errors visible, and mitigate the effects of errors.22 Ongoing multidisciplinary analysis of incidents, also termed root cause analysis, is important for developing further system improvements.27
While a number of interventions based on these principles have been studied in adults, few data are available in pediatrics. The study by Folli et al19 demonstrated that pharmacy review of medication orders could prevent erroneous orders from being implemented at a rate of 14 to 18 per 1000 patient-days. Unfortunately, other interventions remain largely untested in children.
Review of preventable and potential ADEs by the physician evaluators in this study suggested that the majority could potentially have been prevented by computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support (eg, drug-allergy checks, drug-dose checks, drug-drug interaction checks). This finding is not surprising since 79% of the potential ADEs occurred at the stage of ordering of medications. Common types of ordering errors included physician omission or incorrect choice of dose, route, or frequency; order illegibility; and physician use of nonstandard terminology.
Studies in adult hospitals have demonstrated the impact of computerized physician order entry on error reduction. Computerized physician order entry reduced the rate of nonintercepted serious medication errors by 55% in a large tertiary care adult hospital.16 In another study of this system, limited decision support decreased the medication error rate by 64%, and with more developed decision support the error rate decreased by 81%.28 Coupling physician order entry with a computerized MAR is likely to reduce transcription errors, a common class of inpatient medication errors (10% in this study).
It is important to recognize, however, that some of the factors making children vulnerable to errors also complicate development of computerized pediatric systems. For example, pharmacokinetics and appropriate drug doses change rapidly as a premature neonate gains weight and renal and hepatic drug elimination systems mature. A pediatric computer order entry system will have to be sufficiently flexible to respond to these changes.
Review of preventable and potential ADEs by the physician evaluators in this study suggested that full-time, ward-based clinical pharmacists potentially could have prevented the majority of errors. Traditionally, physicians decide on drug therapy, and pharmacists and nurses implement these decisions. The presence of clinical pharmacists on work rounds may lead to more informed clinical decisions by physicians, as well as interception of errors before medication orders are finalized. Their presence on the wards should facilitate communication between clinical staff and the pharmacy. In addition, clinical pharmacists could independently monitor the transcription process, assist nurses with drug preparation and administration, and monitor the drug preparation, storage, and distribution systems. They also could be involved in developing education programs and drug therapy protocols. Although ward-based pharmacists were present in one of the hospitals we studied, they were not involved full time in work rounds, monitoring the transcription process, or other ward-based error prevention activities.
A clinical pharmacist participating in physician rounds in an adult ICU decreased preventable ADEs by 66%.17 In addition, ward-based interventions may reduce costs of care. During a 3-month study, a clinical pharmacist made 345 interventions in an adult ICU, leading to a $24 000 cost reduction.29 However, the impact of ward-based clinical pharmacists has not been assessed in pediatrics.
Our study has several limitations. We studied 2 academic institutions, so our results may not be generalizable to nonacademic hospitals in which most children receive care. Despite a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to data collection, we probably failed to detect some errors, particularly administration errors detected more reliably by trained observers following nurses during routine patient care activities.30 Also, we did not attempt to detect inappropriate drug choice, which is detected most reliably using explicit criteria based on evidence, rather than implicit criteria based on clinical judgment.31 Because nurses and physicians on the study wards were aware of the study, the Hawthorne effect could have affected both the occurrence and detection of errors. In addition, the incidence of errors could have been reduced as the study progressed because we were obliged to take corrective action when we identified serious practice problems. For example, an incorrect preparation of insulin was dispensed to one of the medical floors resulting in mild hypoglycemic events in children with diabetes, and we notified the pharmacy immediately.
Classification bias may have affected our finding that the highest rate of potential ADEs occurred in neonates, since we used expert clinical judgment and consensus to classify incidents. The 2 investigators who made these determinations may have been inclined to consider errors as potentially harmful when they occurred in critically ill neonates. However, the potential ADE rate was so much higher in this group that it is unlikely to be completely attributable to subjectivity. Furthermore, 3 of the 5 preventable ADEs occurred in neonates in the NICU.
The development and testing of medication error reduction interventions is important in pediatrics, especially in the NICU, given the increased medical vulnerability and decreased communication ability of small and critically ill children, the need for weight-based dosing, and the need for pharmacy dilution of stock medications. To reduce the rates of potential and preventable ADEs in pediatrics, the most effective interventions are likely to be computerized physician order entry with integrated clinical decision support and full-time, ward-based clinical pharmacists.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Kaushal, Bates, Landrigan, McKenna, Clapp, Federico, Goldmann.
Acquisition of data: Kaushal, Landrigan, McKenna, Goldmann.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Kaushal, Bates, Landrigan, Federico, Goldmann.
Drafting of the manuscript: Kaushal, Goldmann.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bates, Landrigan, McKenna, Clapp, Federico, Goldmann.
Statistical expertise: Kaushal, Landrigan.
Obtained funding: Kaushal, Bates, Landrigan, McKenna, Goldmann.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Bates, Landrigan, McKenna, Clapp, Federico, Goldmann.
Study supervision: Bates, Goldmann.
Financial Disclosure: Dr Bates has received honoraria for speaking from Eclipsys Corp, which has licensed the rights for possible commercial development to Brigham and Women's Hospital Clinical Information System. Dr Bates is coinventor on patent No. 6029138 held by Brigham and Women's Hospital on the use of decision support software for medical management, licensed to Medicalis Corp. He holds a minority equity position in Medicalis, a privately held company that develops Web-based decision support for radiology test ordering. He also serves as a consultant to Medicalis. Dr Bates is also a consultant and serves on the advisory board for McKesson MedManagement, a company that assists hospitals in preventing adverse drug events. He has received honoraria for speaking from Automated Healthcare, which makes robots that dispense medications. He is also on the clinical advisory boards for Becton Dickinson, which develops drug delivery systems; Zynx Inc, which develops evidence-based algorithms; and SoCurious Inc, which compiles information on compliance for drug companies; and he is a consultant for Alaris, which makes intravenous drug delivery systems.
Funding/Support: This work was supported by a grant from the Risk Management Foundation. Dr Kaushal was partially supported by grant T32 HS00063 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Acknowledgment: We would like to thank John Orav, PhD, for his statistical assistance, and Erin Hartman, MS, for her review of the manuscript. In addition, we would like to thank Priscilla Dasse, RN, MPH, Alan Ezekowitz, MD, PhD, Constance Crowley Ganzer, MS, RN, and Ronald Kleinman, MD, for their support.
Corresponding Author and Reprints: Donald A. Goldmann, MD, Children's Hospital, Enders 609, Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: Don.Goldmann{at}tch.harvard.edu).
Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Kaushal, Landrigan, and Goldmann) and Quality Improvement and Risk Management (Ms McKenna), Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (Drs Kaushal and Bates); Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Ms Clapp); and Risk Management Foundation, Cambridge, Mass (Mr Federico).
REFERENCES
| |
1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results from the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370-376.
ABSTRACT
2. Leape LL, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, Johnson WG. Preventing medical injury. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1993;19:144-149.
PUBMED
3. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:261-271.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
4. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
5. Leape LL. Institute of Medicine medical error figures are not exaggerated. JAMA. 2000;284:95-97.
FREE FULL TEXT
6. McDonald CJ, Weiner M, Hui SL. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. JAMA. 2000;284:93-95.
FREE FULL TEXT
7. Brennan TA. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors—could it do harm? N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1123-1125.
FREE FULL TEXT
8. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird NM, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results from the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377-384.
ABSTRACT
9. Bates DW, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274:29-34.
FREE FULL TEXT
10. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274:35-43.
FREE FULL TEXT
11. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1997;277:307-311.
FREE FULL TEXT
12. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Burke JP. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1997;277:301-306.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.
FREE FULL TEXT
14. Bates DW, Leape LL, Petrycki S. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:289-294.
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Vander Vliet MB, Schneider J, Leape LL. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:199-205.
ISI
| PUBMED
16. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311-1316.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999;282:267-270.
FREE FULL TEXT
18. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:232-238.
FREE FULL TEXT
19. Folli HL, Poole RL, Benitz WE, Russo JC. Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals. Pediatrics. 1987;79:718-722.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. Naranjo CA, Busto O, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239-245.
ISI
| PUBMED
21. Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
22. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851-1857.
FREE FULL TEXT
23. Perrow C. Normal Accidents. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1984.
24. Forrester JW. Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. MIT Technol Rev. 1971;73:52-68.
25. Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:53-56.
ISI
| PUBMED
26. Glauber J, Goldmann DA, Homer CJ, Berwick DM. Reducing medical error through systems improvement: the management of febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1330-1332.
FREE FULL TEXT
27. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook. Oakbrook, Ill: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 1999.
28. Bates DW, Teich J, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:313-321.
FREE FULL TEXT
29. Katona BG, Ayd PR, Walters JK, Caspi M, Finkelstein BW. Effect of a pharmacist's and a nurse's interventions on cost of drug therapy in a medical intensive-care unit. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989;46:1179-1182.
ABSTRACT
30. Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47:555-571.
ABSTRACT
31. Asthon CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML, et al. An empirical assessment of the validity of explicit and implicit process-of-care criteria for quality assessment. Med Care. 1999;37:798-808.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Medication Errors in Children
Robert L. Poole, William E. Benitz, Jonathan D. Reich, Rainu Kaushal, David W. Bates, Margaret D. Clapp, Frank Federico, Christopher Landrigan, Kathryn J. McKenna, and Donald A. Goldmann
JAMA. 2001;286(8):915-916.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
April 25, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(16):2141-2142.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Cardiovascular Medication Errors in Children
Alexander et al.
Pediatrics 2009;124:324-332.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Just a Spoonful of Sugar: Drug Safety for Pediatric Populations
Noah
J Law Med Ethics 2009;37:280-291.
Antimicrobial Prescription Errors in Hospitalized Children: Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in Detection and Intervention
Di Pentima et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2009;48:505-512.
ABSTRACT
Parental Misinterpretations of Over-the-Counter Pediatric Cough and Cold Medication Labels
Lokker et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1464-1471.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Patient Safety Curriculum for Graduate Medical Education: Results From a Needs Assessment of Educators and Patient Safety Experts
Varkey et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:214-221.
ABSTRACT
Specialty-based, voluntary incident reporting in neonatal intensive care: description of 4846 incident reports
Snijders et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F210-F215.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prescribing in paediatrics
Conroy and Carroll
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2009;94:55-59.
FULL TEXT
The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Medication Prescription Errors and Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Intensive Care: A Systematic Review
van Rosse et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1184-1190.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A randomised trial to evaluate prescribing accuracy when using the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel
Hixson et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009;94:268-272.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication Errors Among Adults and Children With Cancer in the Outpatient Setting
Walsh et al.
JCO 2009;27:891-896.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication errors: the impact of prescribing and transcribing errors on preventable harm in hospitalised patients
van Doormaal et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:22-27.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Minimising medication errors in children
Wong et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009;94:161-164.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Health Information Technology by Children's Hospitals in the United States
Menachemi et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:S80-S84.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Influence of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Information Technology Use Among Child Health Providers: The Devil Is in the Details
Menachemi et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:S92-S96.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug events in hospitals participating in the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative
Takata et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:2036-2044.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Retrospective Evaluation of a Computerized Physician Order Entry Adaptation to Prevent Prescribing Errors in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Sard et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:782-787.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
An Intervention to Decrease Narcotic-Related Adverse Drug Events in Children's Hospitals
Sharek et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e861-e866.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medical abbreviations: writing little and communicating less
Walsh and Gurwitz
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:816-817.
FULL TEXT
Iatrogenesis in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Observational and Interventional, Prospective, Multicenter Study
Kugelman et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:550-555.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication Errors in Pediatric Inpatients: Prevalence and Results of a Prevention Program
Otero et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e737-e743.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Duty Hour Limits on Sleep, Work Hours, and Safety
Landrigan et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:250-258.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Unit-based clinical pharmacists' prevention of serious medication errors in pediatric inpatients
Kaushal et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:1254-1260.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Pediatric Quality Indicators
Scanlon et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1723-e1731.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reevaluating the Safety Profile of Pediatrics: A Comparison of Computerized Adverse Drug Event Surveillance and Voluntary Reporting in the Pediatric Environment
Ferranti et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1201-e1207.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Development, Testing, and Findings of a Pediatric-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Medication-Related Harm in US Children's Hospitals
Takata et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e927-e935.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Educational interventions to reduce prescribing errors
Conroy et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:313-315.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study
Fahrenkopf et al.
BMJ 2008;336:488-491.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Computer Order Entry on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors in Hospitalized Children
Walsh et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e421-e427.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Development of a pediatric pocket-sized guide for antimicrobial therapy
Ahern et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:203-205.
FULL TEXT
How do we ensure safe prescribing for children?
Sammons and Conroy
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:98-99.
FULL TEXT
Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication
Parshuram et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:42-48.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adverse Medical Events in the NICU: Epidemiology and Prevention
Morriss
NeoReviews 2008;9:e8-e23.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication Administration Variances Before and After Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Taylor et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:123-128.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient Safety in the Pediatric Emergency Care Setting
Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Pediatrics 2007;120:1367-1375.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry on the Incidence of Adverse Drug Events in Pediatric Inpatients
Holdsworth et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:1058-1066.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Quality of Children's Health Care Matters -- Time to Pay Attention
Perrin and Homer
NEJM 2007;357:1549-1551.
FULL TEXT
Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department
Fairbanks et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:716-718.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacist-managed antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical patients
Bond and Raehl
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1935-1942.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature
Snijders et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F391-F398.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pharmacists' perceptions of computerized prescriber-order-entry systems
Inquilla et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1626-1632.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of a pharmacist-led pediatrics medication safety team on medication-error reporting
Costello et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1422-1426.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Extent and Importance of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry
Ash et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:415-423.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Electronic Prescribing Systems in Pediatrics: The Rationale and Functionality Requirements
Council on Clinical Information Technology
Pediatrics 2007;119:1229-1231.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Review of the Acuity Scoring Systems for the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Their Use in Quality Improvement
Marcin and Pollack
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:131-140.
ABSTRACT
The role of communication in paediatric drug safety
Stebbing et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007;92:440-445.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication errors in paediatric care: a systematic review of epidemiology and an evaluation of evidence supporting reduction strategy recommendations
Miller et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:116-126.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reporting and Disclosing Medical Errors: Pediatricians' Attitudes and Behaviors
Garbutt et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:179-185.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review
Kuperman et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:29-40.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation and Certification of Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems
Classen et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:48-55.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
To What Extent Do Pediatricians Accept Computer-Based Dosing Suggestions?
Killelea et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e69-e75.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevention of Pediatric Medication Errors by Hospital Pharmacists and the Potential Benefit of Computerized Physician Order Entry
Wang et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e77-e85.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication Errors Related to Computerized Order Entry for Children
Walsh et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1872-1879.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adverse Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development, Testing, and Findings of an NICU-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Harm in North American NICUs
Sharek et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1332-1340.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Emergency Medical Services System Changes Reduce Pediatric Epinephrine Dosing Errors in the Prehospital Setting
Kaji et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1493-1500.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Risk Reduction for Adverse Drug Events Through Sequential Implementation of Patient Safety Initiatives in a Children's Hospital
Leonard et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:e1124-e1129.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systematic Review of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients
Ghaleb et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:1766-1776.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology.
Wetterneck et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:1528-1538.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
User satisfaction with an intravenous medication safety system.
Eckel et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:1419-1423.
FULL TEXT
Adverse Drug Reactions Among Children Over a 10-Year Period
Le et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:555-562.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Study of Medication Errors on a Community Hospital Oncology Ward
Ford et al.
J Oncol Pract 2006;2:149-154.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Inter- and intra-rater reliability for classification of medication related events in paediatric inpatients.
Kunac et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:196-201.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medical injuries among hospitalized children.
Meurer et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:202-207.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Computer based medication error reporting: insights and implications.
Miller et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:208-213.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatric medication safety and the media: what does the public see?
Stebbing et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1907-1914.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reported medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit: data from a large national data set.
Clark et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1979-1987.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The impact of prescribing safety alerts for elderly persons in an electronic medical record: an interrupted time series evaluation.
Smith et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1098-1104.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Return on Investment for a Computerized Physician Order Entry System
Kaushal et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:261-266.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Error Reduction in Pediatric Chemotherapy: Computerized Order Entry and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
Kim et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:495-498.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical errors and medical negligence
Oyebode
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 2006;12:221-227.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Occurrence and Impact of Unanticipated Variation in Intravenous Methotrexate Dosing
Parshuram et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:805-811.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems.
Kilbridge et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:81-84.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication errors in paediatric patients
Ghaleb and Wong
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2006;91:ep20-ep20.
FULL TEXT
Patterns of drug utilization in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Warrier et al.
J Clin Pharmacol 2006;46:449-455.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatric Hospitalists: Report of a Leadership Conference
Lye et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1122-1130.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Health care failure mode and effect analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward
van Tilburg et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:58-63.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Of Lobsters, Electronic Medical Records, and Neonatal Total Parenteral Nutrition
Costakos
Pediatrics 2006;117:e328-e332.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Using a Preprinted Order Sheet to Reduce Prescription Errors in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Kozer et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:1299-1302.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Change Management in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital
Upperman et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:e634-e642.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
What constitutes a prescribing error in paediatrics?
Ghaleb et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:352-357.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Publication of ethically suspect research: should it occur?
Fernandez
Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:377-378.
FULL TEXT
Drug administration errors and their determinants in pediatric in-patients
Prot et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:381-389.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical pharmacists: Essential members of the pediatric critical care team
Chicella and Dice
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1763-1763.
FULL TEXT
Safe chemotherapy administration: Using failure mode and effects analysis in computerized prescriber order entry
Kozakiewicz et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1813-1816.
FULL TEXT
Are Language Barriers Associated With Serious Medical Events in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients?
Cohen et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:575-579.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Preventable Adverse Events in Infants Hospitalized With Bronchiolitis
McBride et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:603-608.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day
Ursprung et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:284-289.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacist-managed aminoglycoside or vancomycin therapy
Bond and Raehl
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1596-1605.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
How to avoid paediatric medication errors: a user's guide to the literature
Walsh et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:698-702.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Epidemiology, Comparative Methods of Detection, and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events
Al-Tajir and Kelly
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2005;39:1169-1174.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards
Han et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:179-184.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fostering Rational Regulation of Patient Safety
Mello et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2005;30:375-426.
ABSTRACT
Challenging times for food allergy tests
Roberts
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:564-566.
FULL TEXT
A Trial of Automated Decision Support Alerts for Contraindicated Medications Using Computerized Physician Order Entry
Galanter et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:269-274.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology
Husch et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:80-86.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Relationship between tort claims and patient incident reports in the Veterans Health Administration
Schmidek and Weeks
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:117-122.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Implementation of an i.v. medication safety system
Williams and Maddox
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:530-536.
FULL TEXT
The National Patient Safety Agency
Stephenson
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:226-228.
FULL TEXT
Adverse Events and Preventable Adverse Events in Children
Woods et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:155-160.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
