You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 19, May 15, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Frequency of Inappropriate Metformin Prescriptions

To the Editor: Metformin is commonly used in the management of type 2 diabetes. More than 25 million prescriptions for metformin were written in 2000, making it the most commonly prescribed branded diabetes medication in the United States.1 Metformin has been associated with the development of lactic acidosis, and since its initial marketing in 1995 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has required a "black box" warning in the package insert.2-3 Labeled contraindications include renal dysfunction and congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring pharmacologic treatment.4 We sought to determine the frequency of metformin use in a sample of patients with these 2 primary contraindications to therapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients receiving metformin through our outpatient pharmacy at an academic medical center. Institutional review board approval was obtained, and all patients with 2 or more prescriptions for metformin processed between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2000, were identified. These patient records were randomized using a random number generator (SAS v6.12, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

The prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions for metformin was defined as the percent of patients receiving metformin who had documented CHF or renal dysfunction. Patients were considered to have CHF if the diagnosis was included in the medical problem list or clinic notes, and if they were taking medications for CHF (diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin). Renal dysfunction was defined as a serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL (132.6 µmol/L) for men and greater than 1.4 mg/dL (123.8 µmol/L) for women. Patient records were also reviewed for documentation of functional cardiac status or evidence that contraindications were considered.


Results

Pharmacy records identified 241 patients with 2 or more prescriptions for metformin; 100 of these were randomly selected for chart review. Twenty-two patients (22%; 95% confidence interval, 14%-30%) were found to have either CHF requiring medications or renal insufficiency. Of these 22 patients, 14 had CHF only, 5 had renal insufficiency only, and 3 had both. For patients with contraindications to metformin, the mean age was 60 years, 50% were women, and 50% were African American. These characteristics were similar for patients without contraindications. Patients with contraindications did have a significantly longer duration of diabetes (14.2 vs 6.4 years; P<.001).

Of the 17 patients with CHF, 4 patients had a documented New York Heart Association functional classification (class II: n = 2; class III: n = 2). Of the 8 patients with renal dysfunction, the mean serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL (159.1 µmol/L) and mean blood urea nitrogen was 27 mg/dL (9.639 mmol/L). Only 2 patients had documentation in the medical record that providers considered metformin contraindications.


Comment

In our review, almost one quarter of patients with a prescription for metformin had 1 or more absolute contraindications. Several recent studies in Europe have documented similar rates of inappropriate metformin prescribing.2, 5-6

Adverse event reports suggest the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is between 1 in 10 000 to 1 in 100 000 patient-years.7 In the first 14 months after its release in the United States, the FDA received 47 confirmed cases of lactic acidosis associated with metformin, with a 42% mortality rate. More than 90% of patients had relative or absolute contraindications to metformin.3

Because our assessment of the prevalence of contraindications to metformin use relies on a chart review, it may underestimate the frequency of contraindications and it is difficult to determine whether clinicians are aware they are prescribing metformin against a black-box warning. Nonetheless, our results suggest that metformin frequently may be inappropriately prescribed despite black-box contraindications. Documentation of this potential risk in the medical record is limited and health care providers should consider improving the documentation of the risk of lactic acidosis and provide appropriate counseling for patients who receive the drug.

Cheryl Horlen, PharmD
School of Pharmacy
Campbell University
Buies Creek, NC

Robb Malone, PharmD,CDE; Betsy Bryant, PharmD,CDE
Department of Medicine
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill

Betty Dennis, PharmD,MS,CDE
University of North Carolina Hospital Pharmacy
Chapel Hill

Tim Carey, MD,MPH; Mike Pignone, MD,MPH; Russell Rothman, MD,MPP
Department of Medicine
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill

1. Top 200 drugs by retail sales in 2000. Drug Topics 2001. March 19, 2001.
2. Emslie-Smith AM, Boyle DI, Evans JM, Sullivan F, Morris AD. Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study of adherence to prescribing guidelines. Diabet Med. 2001;18:483-488. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
3. Misbin RI, Green L, Stadel BV, Gueriguian JL, Gubbi A, Fleming GA. Lactic acidosis in patients with diabetes treated with metformin. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:265-266. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Glucophage. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb; 2001.
5. Holstein A, Nahrwold D, Hinze S, Egberts EH. Contra-indications to metformin therapy are largely disregarded. Diabet Med. 1999;16:692-696. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. Sulkin TV, Bosman D, Krentz AJ. Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:925-928. ABSTRACT
7. Howlett HC, Bailey CJ. A risk-benefit assessment of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Saf. 1999;20:489-503. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2002;287:2504-2505.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Metformin Use in Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: Cause for Concern?
Swift
Diabetes Spectr. 2009;22:18-20.
FULL TEXT  

Adherence to black box warnings for prescription medications in outpatients.
Lasser et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:338-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Renal Status Among Patients Using Metformin in a Primary Care Setting
Kennedy et al.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:922-924.
FULL TEXT  

Review: metformin does not increase risk of lactic acidosis or increase lactate levels in type 2 diabetes
Kruse
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:111-111.
FULL TEXT  

The Phantom of Lactic Acidosis due to Metformin in Patients With Diabetes
Misbin
Diabetes Care 2004;27:1791-1793.
FULL TEXT  

Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitals
Clement et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:553-591.
FULL TEXT  

Safety Issues on Metformin Use
Aldasouqi and Duick
Diabetes Care 2003;26:3356-3357.
FULL TEXT  

Metformin and Thiazolidinedione Use in Medicare Patients With Heart Failure
Masoudi et al.
JAMA 2003;290:81-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.