 |
|
The Hospitalist Movement 5 Years Later
Robert M. Wachter, MD;
Lee Goldman, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2002;287:487-494.
ABSTRACT
| |
Context We originally described the hospitalist model of inpatient care in 1996; since then, the model has experienced tremendous growth. This growth has important clinical, financial, educational, and policy implications.
Objectives To review data regarding the effect of hospitalists on resource use, quality of care, satisfaction, and teaching; and to analyze the impact of hospitalists on the health care system and frame key issues facing the movement.
Data Sources and Study Selection We searched MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1996 to September 2001 for studies comparing hospitalist care with an appropriate control group in terms of resource use, quality, or satisfaction outcomes.
Data Extraction We extracted information regarding study design, nature of hospitalist and control groups, analytical strategies, and key outcomes.
Data Synthesis Most studies found that implementation of hospitalist programs was associated with significant reductions in resource use, usually measured as hospital costs (average decrease, 13.4%) or average length of stay (average decrease, 16.6%). The few studies that failed to demonstrate reductions usually used atypical control groups. Although several studies found improved outcomes, such as inpatient mortality and readmission rates, these results were inconsistent. Patient satisfaction was generally preserved, while limited data supported positive effects on teaching. Although concerns about inpatient-outpatient information transfer remain, recent physician surveys indicate general acceptance of the model.
Conclusions Empirical research supports the premise that hospitalists improve inpatient efficiency without harmful effects on quality or patient satisfaction. Education may be improved. In part catalyzed by these data, the clinical use of hospitalists is growing rapidly, and hospitalists are also assuming prominent roles as teachers, researchers, and quality leaders. The hospitalist field has now achieved many of the attributes of traditional medical specialties and seems destined to continue to grow.
INTRODUCTION
Five years ago, we described a burgeoning model of care in the United States, in which a new breed of physicians, whom we dubbed "hospitalists," provide inpatient care in place of primary care physicians or academic 1-month-per-year attendings.1 We cited numerous forces fomenting this change, including cost pressures on hospitals, physician groups, and managed care organizations; the increased acuity of hospitalized patients and the accelerated pace of their hospitalizations; the time pressures on primary care physicians in the office; the decreasing inpatient volumes of most primary physicians; and the evidence that practice makes perfect in other medical fields. We predicted that the hospitalist movement would grow and ultimately become a, if not the, dominant model for inpatient care in the United States. Finally, we argued that judgments regarding the hospitalist model should be informed by data on cost, quality, education, and patient satisfaction.
Our original article generated several negative responses,2-4 largely focused on the purposeful discontinuity in care introduced by the hospitalist model. Later, concerns were raised when a few managed care organizations attempted to mandate the use of hospitalists.5-7 Several medical societies mounted vigorous opposition to mandatory hospitalists, including the National Association of Inpatient Physicians (NAIP), the hospitalists' newly established professional society. Since then, attempts to create mandatory programs by managed care organizations have become unusual,8 and physicians and their societies have increasingly accepted voluntary hospitalist systems.9-11
This acceptance is reflected in the remarkable growth in the hospitalist model over the past several years. By 1999, 65% of internists had hospitalists in their community and 28% reported using them for inpatient care.10 The referral rate was even higher (62%) among primary care physicians in California.11 There are hospitalist programs at many prestigious US hospitals (BOX 1). In its first 3 years, NAIP has grown to more than 2300 members. A recent analysis projected an ultimate US hospitalist workforce of about 19 000 (up from 5000 presently), which would make it comparable in size to cardiology.19
| Box 1. Twelve of the US "Top 15 Hospitals, 2001" That Have Active Hospitalist Programs*
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Brigham and Women's Hospital13
Cleveland Clinic14
Duke University Medical Center
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania15
Massachusetts General Hospital
Mayo Clinic
Stanford University Hospital
UCLA Medical Center16
University of California, San Francisco Medical Center17
University of Chicago Hospitals18
University of Michigan Medical Center
*As defined by US News & World Report12 as of December 2001 and presented in alphabetical order.
RETURN TO TEXT |
|
Most of the early growth of the hospitalist movement occurred in the absence of data. Published data now illuminate some key successes and challenges for the movement as it enters its next 5 years.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 1996 to September 2001 to identify studies, published in either manuscript or abstract form. When abstracts led to manuscripts reporting the same population of patients, only the manuscript was included. When preliminary results were cited, we contacted authors for updated results. We searched on both title and key words for "hospitalist" or "hospitalists," and included studies that reported data comparing hospitalists with an appropriate nonhospitalist control group on resource use and/or clinical outcomes. We extracted information regarding study design, nature of hospitalist and control groups, use of risk or other adjustment, and key outcomes. Because of the newness of the literature and the relative dearth of methodologically rigorous studies, a formal statistical analysis (eg, meta-analysis) was not attempted.20
We also aimed to describe and analyze several additional hospitalist-related thematic issues, including training, expanding roles for hospitalists, patient and provider satisfaction, and financing hospitalist programs. We performed focused literature searches in these areas in addition to the systematic review of efficiency and quality.
RESULTS
We found 19 published studies (12 articles, 7 abstracts) regarding the impact of hospitalist programs on financial and clinical outcomes (Table 1).18, 21-44 Viewed together, the studies cover all health care delivery settings: teaching and nonteaching hospitals, urban and rural locations, adult and pediatric services, and managed care and nonmanaged care environments. Fifteen of the 19 studies found significant decreases in both hospital costs (average decrease, 13.4%) and lengths of stay (average decrease, 16.6%).18, 21-22,25, 28-38,40-42,44 Two studies demonstrated decreases in average length of stay but no decreases in hospital costs.23, 27 Only 2 of 19 studies found neither cost nor length of stay reductions.39, 43 In 1 study, the nonhospitalists had attended an average of 2.5 months in the year before the intervention,39 a very different group than the more typical comparison groups of primary care physicians or academic 1-month-per-year attendings. In the other study,43 the control group was a family practice teaching service in which a rotating group of 4 physicians served as dedicated inpatient attendings 2 weeks out of 8 weeks, thus meeting one of the published definitions of hospitalist.45
|
|
|
|
Table 1. A Summary of Outcome Studies of Hospitalist Programs*
|
|
|
Proponents of the hospitalist model postulate that hospitalists improve inpatient care quality, both through practice makes perfect and through their onsite availability throughout the day. Critics have raised concerns that quality might be sacrificed on the altar of efficiency. Thus far, there is little to suggest that hospitalist-generated savings come at the expense of quality (Table 1). Most studies have found no change in quality measures. One study demonstrated a significant decrease in readmission rates,22 while another showed an increase in potentially preventable readmissions.33 One very small observational study (n = 99 hospitalist patients) of heart failure patients showed an increased hospital mortality rate in the hospitalist group (2.0% vs 1.5%).23 However, 2 much larger (averaging 1600 hospitalist patients per study) and more methodologically rigorous studies (1 quasi-randomized, the other adjusted for case-mix) found significant decreases in inpatient and short-term mortality, which grew to approximately a 33% relative reduction in the hospitalist programs' second year (4.2% vs 6.0% in 1 study, 4.8% vs 7.2% in the other).18, 37 These results, while provocative, are insufficient to support an unqualified statement that hospitalists improve quality. In addition to more large and rigorous outcome studies, future studies should use more refined measures of quality, including functional status outcomes and process measures associated with improved outcomes, such as the use of appropriate medications for heart failure, rapid administration of antibiotics in pneumonia, and smoking cessation counseling for patients admitted with asthma.46-47
COMMENT
The published outcomes literature has generally upheld the promise of the hospitalist model, as demonstrated by impressive and consistent cost savings associated with no decrease in quality. Assuming the average US hospitalist cares for 600 inpatients yearly48 and generates a 10% savings over the average medical inpatient cost of $8000, the nation's 5000 hospitalists would reduce inpatient costs by approximately $2.4 billion per year.
Satisfaction and Experience of Patients and Physicians
A major early concern was that patients accustomed to having their primary physician as their inpatient attending would not accept hospitalists.45 In general, however, surveys of patients who were cared for by hospitalists show high levels of satisfaction, no lower than that of similar patients cared for by their own primary physicians28, 31-32 or by traditional academic ward attendings.18, 21 We have postulated that patients may be willing to trade off the familiarity of their regular physician for the availability of the hospitalist.45
Initial resistance to the hospitalist movement among physicians often focused on the unavoidable discontinuity in care created by the model and the potential loss of information across the hospital threshold.45, 49-52 Effective hospitalist programs have created mechanisms to mitigate the impact of this discontinuity, including calling primary care physicians on admission and discharge, faxing daily progress notes, and encouraging primary care physicians to visit or call their hospitalized patients. Though some concerns about information transfer linger, 2 recent surveys suggest that most physicians now accept the hospitalist model. In a national telephone survey of 400 internists, 51% (204) thought hospitalists might provide better care and 46% (184) thought patients might get more cost-effective care. Although 73% were concerned about the impact of hospitalists on continuity, physicians with hospitalists in their community were more approving.10 In a survey of 524 California primary care physicians, physicians perceived hospitalists as increasing (41%) or not changing (44%) the overall quality of care and most (55%) thought that hospitalists increase inpatient efficiency.11 In both surveys, primary care physicians stated their belief that patients generally preferred to be cared for in the hospital by their regular physician. Surveys of both generalists and specialists at Park Nicollet showed high levels of physician satisfaction several years after the implementation of a hospitalist program.28
Although concerns remain about potential burnout, surveys of NAIP members conducted in 199753 and 2000 (A. Auerbach, MD, MPH, written communication, December 2001) found that more than 80% expected to be hospitalists in 2 to 3 years. In a 1999 NAIP survey, 64% still expected to be hospitalists in 7 years.54 Using a standard scale, the 1999 survey found that 62% were at no current risk of burnout, 25% were at risk for burnout, and 13% were in fact burned out. These burnout rates are significantly lower than those documented in similar surveys of intensivists and emergency medicine physicians,55-57 although rates may climb as the hospitalist field matures.54 Most hospitalists chose the field for its "intellectual stimulation and enjoyment," "chance to be involved in an emerging specialty," and "chance to have a job with predictable hours and lifestyle."54
Training for Hospitalist Careers
Until recently, there were no specific training programs for hospitalists. Thus, hospitalists have developed from diverse training backgrounds. The 1997 NAIP survey indicated that 90% of hospitalists were internists: 50% general internists and 40% medical subspecialists. Of this latter group, half were pulmonologists and/or critical care specialists.53 The 1999 survey found that the generalist fraction had grown to 75%, while subspecialists fell to 15%.54 Our impression is that early programs often took advantage of the onsite presence of pulmonary physicians, intensivists, and other subspecialists. The recent data indicate that the maturing field is attracting more general internists who view it as a long-term career option. In both surveys, about 3% to 5% of hospitalists were family physicians and another 5% to 7% were pediatricians.58
There are now several early training programs for hospitalists, including a residency track and fellowship program at the University of California, San Francisco.59 In developing training modules for hospitalists, researchers have been guided by a survey in which practicing hospitalists rated areas of importance to their practice and sufficiency of their training (Table 2).60 Interestingly, hospitalists thought that clinical skills (ie, managing heart failure, inserting central lines, interpreting electrocardiograms) were very important and had been well taught during residency. Conversely, they cited major educational deficits in their training regarding communication skills, end-of-life care, quality improvement and patient safety, medical economics, care of surgical patients, and postacute care. These topics are likely to form the core of future hospitalist curricula for both trainees and practicing physicians. Although graduating residents raised concerns about underpreparedeness in some of the same areas, such as in nursing home care and quality improvement, in a recent national survey,61 other educational deficits cited by hospitalists (eg, palliative care) were not raised to the same extent by these graduating residents. Moreover, the illustrative cases and settings used to train future hospitalists would undoubtedly be different than those used to educate outpatient generalists, even within the same general content area, such as pain management or patient safety.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Results of a Survey of 480 Practicing Hospitalists, Demonstrating the Mismatch Between Areas of Importance in Practice and Emphasis in Residency Training*
|
|
|
Hospitalists' Expanding Roles
Initially, hospitalists engaged primarily in traditional hospital internal medicine or pediatric practice, caring for medical inpatients and performing medical consultations on nonmedical patients. The data showing improvements in efficiency with at worst stasis (and possibly improvements) in outcomes and satisfaction relate to these traditional functions. Like a drug that is approved for specific indications but finds broader use in practice, hospitalists are being employed in a number of off-label functions, including emergency department triage and managing hospital-to-hospital transfers.53
An area of controversy is the role of hospitalists in the intensive care unit. Approximately 80% of hospitalists care for their own patients in intensive care units,53 frequently or always calling on intensivists as consultants. Although the literature demonstrates improved outcomes and efficiency when intensivists participate in the care of critically ill patients,62-66 the comparison groups in these studies were either nonhospitalist ward attendings or community-based primary care physicians. There are no data comparing hospitalist-based intensive care (with intensivist consultation) to intensivist-based care. Further research is needed to determine the optimal models for intensive care when both hospitalists and intensivists are available. Collaborative hospitalist-intensivist models will become increasingly important if the projected national shortage of critical care physicians materializes.67
Finally, in many systems hospitalists are moving beyond the traditional role of medical consultant to a new role as physician-of-record for nonmedical inpatients with medical comorbidities. Just as with the primary care physician whose office obligations make inpatient management and discharge planning difficult during daylight hours, the surgeon is similarly obligated in the operating room. In the 1997 NAIP survey, nearly half the hospitalists had added this comanagement role to their repertoire.53 To date, there are no data regarding the impact of hospitalists on the care of surgical patients, making this an important area for future research.
The Impact of Hospitalists on Academia
Most early hospitalist groups formed in community hospitals. Over the past 5 years, many academic medical centers have adopted hospitalist models for inpatient care and teaching. Beyond the legitimacy that this expansion into academia affords the movement,68 the 2 greatest effects are on education and research.69
Academic hospitalists are emerging as core teachers of inpatient medicine. For example, at the University of California, San Francisco, 15 faculty hospitalists now staff about two thirds of ward-attending months and all medical consult months. Preliminary evidence indicates that resident teaching evaluations of hospitalists are significantly higher than those of our highly selected nonhospitalist 1-month-per-year ward attendings (K. Hauer, MD, written communication, December 2001), an effect seen elsewhere as well.32 The impact on medical student education has not been empirically studied; we recently described several potential advantages and disadvantages of hospitalists in student education.70
The development of hospitalist groups in academic medical centers may have its most far-reaching effects in defining a new research agenda.69 No longer limiting their research to the impact of the hospitalist model itself, academic hospitalists are now applying the tools of health services and outcomes research, ethics, and clinical epidemiology to critical inpatient issues, such as preventing nosocomial infections,71 end-of-life care,72 and hospital quality measurement.46 Over time, hospitalists are likely to become increasingly engaged in patient-centered research, clinical trials, and genetic epidemiology (BOX 2), taking advantage of their onsite availability and large numbers of potential subjects.
| Box 2. Clinical Research That Might Be Undertaken by Academic Hospitalists, Beginning With Those Areas Already Under Study
1. Studies of the efficiency, cost, and quality of hospitalist services.
2. Studies of new approaches to systems issues that arise in and around the hospital (eg, medical errors, pain management, palliative care, inpatient-outpatient communication).
3. Clinical trials (single site or multicenter) involving diseases that hospitalists commonly encounter (eg, pneumonia, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, heart failure, thromboembolism, asthma).
4. Multicenter trials involving interventions with smaller expected benefits or less common diseases.
5. Multicenter studies of the etiology of disease and disease susceptibility (eg, genetic analyses of why some patients become severely ill with pneumococcal pneumonia while exposed family members do not).
RETURN TO TEXT |
|
We originally defined a hospitalist as a physician who spends more than 25% of his/her time caring for inpatients, referring them back to their primary care physician at discharge.45 The NAIP later defined hospitalists as physicians whose primary professional focus (clinical, teaching, research, or administration) was general inpatient care. This distinction is usually unimportant in community settings, since most hospitalists serve in their clinical role for the vast majority of their workday. However, the advent of research-oriented academic hospitalists, who may spend substantial amounts of time engaged in nonclinical activities related to hospital medicine (and perhaps only 2-3 months on the wards) does highlight this definitional question. Currently, the data (Table 1) indicate that hospitalists defined either way achieve efficiency and perhaps other advantages over 1-month-per-year ward attendings or primarily outpatient-based primary care physicians. Preliminary evidence from our institution and elsewhere seems to indicate that faculty who serve as ward attendings for several months each year but whose professional focus is hospital medicine can achieve clinical results comparable with those of more clinically active hospitalists, and therefore such faculty are included in the University of California, San Francisco hospitalist group. It is possible that above a certain level (ie, 2-3 inpatient months per year), a physician's overall focus on the inpatient setting may be as important as his/her aggregate hospital clinical work in the pathogenesis of a hospitalist effect.
Financial, Political, and Organizational Issues
Primary care physicians' willingness to forgo management of their hospitalized patients has been facilitated by the relatively low professional fee compensation for nonprocedural inpatient care. One analysis showed that the average primary care physician would realize a yearly net gain of about $40 000 by forgoing hospital care, simply by replacing wasted commute time with increased ambulatory productivity.73
Unfortunately, these low reimbursements, coupled with the performance of few procedures and the poor payer mix of most general hospital practices, also mean that few hospitalist programs can support themselves on professional fee revenues alone.74-75 Moreover, the effective hospitalist, who may see an inpatient twice a day and talk to the family, primary care physician, radiologist, case manager, and 2 consultants in order to expedite a hospitalization, is reimbursed only for a single inpatient encounter. As a result, the average hospitalist has a shortfall (salary minus collections) of 10% to 50%, depending on the clinical workload, teaching obligations, payer mix, and reimbursement rates.74-76
Medical groups, managed care organizations, or, most commonly, hospitals often find it attractive to support hospitalist programs. If hospitalists improve quality, shorten lengths of stay, and decrease costs while satisfying patients and other providers, the return on these organizations' investments in hospitalist programs is highly favorable. Over time, it will be critical that professional fee reimbursement rates be adjusted so that a sustainable hospitalist workload creates sufficient income to support a full salary.
Hospital Medicine as a New Specialty
The hospitalist movement mirrors the health care trend toward ever-increasing specialization. However, hospitalists are fundamentally generalist physicians who provide and coordinate inpatient care, often aided by myriad subspecialists. How can a generalist be a specialist?
Specialties in medicine are traditionally defined by organ (eg, cardiology), disease (oncology), population (pediatrics), or procedure/technology (surgery or radiology). The hospitalist, on the other hand, is a "site-defined generalist specialist" (similar to emergency medicine physicians or critical care specialists), caring for patients with a wide array of organ derangements, illnesses, and ages within a specific location.45 Accordingly, the hospitalist should not be seen as a retreat from generalism and its emphasis on coordination and integration9, 77 but rather as an affirmation of these values and as a surrogate for the primary care physician in the hospital. The competing pressures resulting from the distance between office and hospital as well as the requirement of around-the-clock availability make the hospital-based generalist a logical evolution.
Hospital medicine has already satisfied many of the requirements of a specialty. A large and enthusiastic group of practitioners identify themselves not according to their training background but as hospitalists. The NAIP is almost certainly the fastest growing physician society in the United States. The field hosts several successful meetings each year and has its own clinical textbook.78
To establish themselves as members of a recognized medical specialty, hospitalists must identify a core skill set or body of knowledge and obtain the approval of credentialing organizations. Advocates of specialty status for hospitalists should be encouraged by the history of 2 other site-defined inpatient specialties: emergency medicine and critical care medicine. Like these relatively young fields, it seems probable that hospitalists will ultimately define a unique set of skills and competencies that will distinguish their field. The identification of practice-training mismatches (Table 2) represents an important first step.
Credentialing organizations deliver the final stamp of approval on new specialties by creating a board certification or added qualification. Most new fields quickly agitate for such status, their motivation both practical and visceral. However, for unique reasons, few hospitalists are pressing this point. Many physicians—hospitalists and nonhospitalists—worry that if a credentialing body (such as the American Boards of Internal Medicine or Pediatrics) created a hospital medicine credential, health maintenance organizations might require that physicians possess this credential to care for inpatients. This would be unacceptable to many primary care physicians, who would be excluded from the hospital despite their desire and competence to continue practicing there. For this reason, we expect neither NAIP nor the relevant boards to promote separate credentials in the near future. Nevertheless, as evolutionary forces lead to specialized training, some formal specialty designation may emerge.79
Conclusion
In summary, the hospitalist model is growing rapidly and appears to have achieved its minimum goal of improving efficiency without adverse effects on quality, teaching, or patient satisfaction. Ongoing larger studies should help determine whether preliminary data suggesting an improvement in some of these outcomes, such as quality and teaching, can be confirmed. The dominant questions no longer relate to whether the hospitalist model is here to stay—even skeptics concede that it is—but rather, the myriad organizational, financial, ethical, educational, and clinical issues that arise with a major change in the organization of US hospital care. We hope that these issues will continue to be settled on the basis of rigorous analysis of the evidence.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author and Reprints: Robert M. Wachter, MD, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0120, San Francisco, CA 94143-0120 (e-mail: bobw{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
REFERENCES
| |
1. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The emerging role of "hospitalists" in the American health care system. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:514-517.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Rubenstein W. The role of "hospitalists" in the health care system. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:445-446.
PUBMED
3. Nakashima WF. The role of "hospitalists" in the health care system. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:445-446.
PUBMED
4. Guttler S. The role of "hospitalists" in the health care system. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:444-445.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. Maguire P. Use of mandatory hospitalists blasted: College, others protest plans that force doctors to give up inpatient care. ACP Observer. 1999;19:1-20.
6. Foubister V. Doctors decry mandatory hospitalists. American Medical News. 1999;42:16-18.
7. Moran T. Just don't make me. Tex Med. 1999;95:32-36.
PUBMED
8. Wachter RM. Debunking myths about the hospitalist movement. Am J Med. 2000;108:672-673.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
9. Sox H. The hospitalist model: perspectives of the patient, the internist, and internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:368-372.
FREE FULL TEXT
10. Auerbach AD, Nelson EA, Lindenauer PK, et al. Physician attitudes toward and prevalence of the hospitalist model of care: results of a national survey. Am J Med. 2000;109:648-653.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
11. Fernandez A, Grumbach K, Goitein L, et al. Friend or foe? how primary care physicians perceive hospitalists. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2902-2908.
FREE FULL TEXT
12. US News & World Report. Best hospitals honor roll. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/nycu/health/hosptl/honroll.htm. Accessed December 18, 2001.
13. Brown MD, Halpert A, McKean S, Sussman A, Dzau VJ. Assessing the value of hospitalists to academic health centers: Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Am J Med. 1999;106:134-137.
ISI
| PUBMED
14. Michota F, Lewis T, Cash J. The hospitalist: will inpatient specialists improve care? Cleve Clin J Med. 1998;65:297-300.
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Wald H. The hospitalist movement. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:544-545.
FREE FULL TEXT
16. Smith MI, Bellamy P, Tillisch J. The role of "hospitalists" in the health care system. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:445-446.
PUBMED
17. Wachter RM, Goldman L. Implications of the hospitalist movement for academic departments of medicine: lessons from the UCSF experience. Am J Med. 1999;106:127-133.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
18. Meltzer DO, Shah MN, Morrison J, et al. Decreased length of stay, costs and mortality in a randomized trial of academic hospitalists. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(suppl):S208.
19. Lurie JD, Miller DP, Lindenauer PK, Wachter RM, Sox HC. The potential size of the hospitalist workforce in the United States. Am J Med. 1999;106:441-445.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
20. Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (updated September 1997) [Cochrane Review on CD-ROM]. Oxford, England: Cochrane Library, Update Software; 1997.
21. Wachter RM, Katz P, Showstack J, Bindman AB, Goldman L. Reorganizing an academic medical service: impact on cost, quality, patient satisfaction, and education. JAMA. 1998;279:1560-1565.
FREE FULL TEXT
22. Diamond HS, Goldberg E, Janosky JE. The effect of full-time faculty hospitalists on the efficiency of care at a community teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:197-203.
FREE FULL TEXT
23. Kroger E, Grant M. Are hospitalists truly more efficient? a natural experiment. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(suppl):S66.
24. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-383.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
25. Stein MD, Hanson S, Tammaro D, Hanna L, Most AS. Economic effects of community vs hospital-based pneumonia care. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:774-777.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
26. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243-250.
FREE FULL TEXT
27. Craig D, Hartka L, Likosky WH, et al. Implementation of a hospitalist system in a large health maintenance organization: the Kaiser Permanente experience. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:355-359.
FREE FULL TEXT
28. Freese RB. Clinical, logistical, and political issues in creating a hospitalist system. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:350-354.
FREE FULL TEXT
29. Rifkin WD, Connor DS, Eichorn A, Rose DN. Comparison of hospitalists and primary care internists in the care of inpatients with pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl):S118.
30. Rifkin WD, Conner DS, Silver A, Eichorn AM. Comparing hospitalists' and community based primary care physicians' care of pneumonia patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(suppl):S215.
31. Davis KM, Koch KE, Harvey JK, et al. Effects of hospitalists on cost, outcomes, and patient satisfaction in a rural health system. Am J Med. 2000;108:621-626.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
32. Halpert AP, Pearson SD, LeWine HE, Mckean SC. The impact of an inpatient physician program on quality, utilization, and satisfaction. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6:549-555.
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Bellet PS, Whitaker RC. Evaluation of a pediatric hospitalist service: impact on length of stay and hospital charges. Pediatrics. 2000;105:478-484.
FREE FULL TEXT
34. Landrigan C, Srivastava R, Muret-Wagstaff S, et al. Outcomes of hospitalization in pediatric patients insured by HMOs: comparison of care by hospitalists and traditional academic providers [abstract]. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:204A.
PUBMED
35. Srivastava R, Landrigan C, Muret-Wagstaff S, et al. Impact of a managed care hospitalist system in academic pediatrics [abstract]. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:228A.
36. Srivastava R, Landrigan C, Muret-Wagstaff S, et al. Cost savings for patients with acute conditions cared for by pediatric hospitalists in a tertiary care center [abstract]. Pediatr Res. 2001;49:125A.
ISI
| PUBMED
37. Auerbach AD, Wachter RM, Katz P, et al. Implementation of a hospitalist service at a community teaching hospital: evolution of service utilization, costs, and patient outcomes. In: Abstract Volume of the Third Annual Meeting of the National Association of Inpatient Physicians; April 11-12, 2000; Philadelphia, Pa.
38. Hackner D, Tu G, Braunstein GD, et al. The value of a hospitalist service: efficient care for the aging population? Chest. 2001;119:580-589.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
39. Kearns PJ, Wang CC, Morris WJ, et al. Hospital care by hospital-based and clinic-based faculty: a prospective, controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:235-241.
FREE FULL TEXT
40. Maggioni A, Reyes MA, Lifshitz F. Evaluation of a pediatric hospitalist service by APR-DRG's: impact on length of stay and hospital charges [abstract]. Pediatr Res. 2001;49:124A.
41. Palmer HC, Armistead N, Manivannan S, et al. The effect of a hospitalist service on patient care in an academic teaching hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl):S116.
42. Palmer H, Delamata M, Mcbride C, et al. After discharge effects of a hospitalist service. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(suppl):S211.
43. Tingle LE, Lambert CT. Comparison of a family practice teaching service and a hospitalist model: costs, charges, length of stay, and mortality. Fam Med. 2001;33:511-515.
ISI
| PUBMED
44. Molinari C, Short R. The effects of an HMO-hospitalist program on inpatient utilization. Am J Manag Care. 2001;7:1051-1057.
ISI
| PUBMED
45. Wachter RM. An introduction to the hospitalist model. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:338-342.
FREE FULL TEXT
46. Shojania KG, Showstack J, Wachter RM. Assessing hospital quality: a review for clinicians. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:82-90.
PUBMED
47. Showstack J, Katz PP, Weber E. Evaluating the impact of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:376-381.
FREE FULL TEXT
48. Lurie JD, Wachter RM. Hospitalist staffing requirements. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:126-130.
PUBMED
49. Calkins DR, Davis RB, Reiley P, et al. Patient-physician communication at hospital discharge and patients' understanding of the postdischarge treatment plan. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1026-1030.
FREE FULL TEXT
50. Simon SR, Lee TH, Goldman L, McDonough AL, Pearson SD. Communication problems for patients hospitalized with chest pain. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:836-838.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
51. Pantilat SZ, Lindenauer PK, Katz PP, Wachter RM. Reach out and touch someone: primary care physician experience and communication with hospitalists. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl):S62.
52. Wolpaw DR, Bailey RH. Old debate, new direction. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:852-853.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
53. Lindenauer PK, Pantilat SZ, Katz PP, Wachter RM. Hospitalists and the practice of inpatient medicine: results of a survey of the National Association of Inpatient Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:343-349.
FREE FULL TEXT
54. Hoff TH, Whitcomb WF, Williams K, Nelson JR, Cheesman RA. Characteristics and work experiences of practicing hospitalists in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:151-158.
FREE FULL TEXT
55. Goldberg R, Boss RW, Chan L, et al. Burnout and its correlates in emergency physicians: four years' experience with a wellness booth. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:1156-1164.
ISI
| PUBMED
56. Guntupalli KK, Fromm RE. Burnout in the internist-intensivist. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:625-630.
ISI
| PUBMED
57. Fields AI, Cuerdon TT, Brasseaux CO, et al. Physician burnout in pediatric critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1425-1429.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
58. Bellet PS, Wachter RM. The hospitalist movement and its implications for the care of hospitalized children. Pediatrics. 1999;103:473-477.
FREE FULL TEXT
59. Hauer KE, Flanders SA, Wachter RM. Training future hospitalists. West J Med. 1999;171:367-370.
ISI
| PUBMED
60. Plauth WH, Pantilat SZ, Wachter RM, Fenton CL. Hospitalists' perceptions of their residency training needs: results of a national survey. Am J Med. 2001;111:247-254.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
61. Blumenthal D, Gokhale M, Campbell EG, Weissman JS. Preparedness for clinical practice: reports of graduating residents at academic health centers. JAMA. 2001;286:1027-1034.
FREE FULL TEXT
62. Pollack MM, Katz RW, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. Improving the outcome and efficiency of intensive care: the impact of an intensivist. Crit Care Med. 1988;16:11-17.
ISI
| PUBMED
63. Li TCM, Phillips MC, Cook EF, Natanson C, Goldman L. On-site physician staffing in a community hospital intensive care unit: impact on test and procedure use and patient outcome. JAMA. 1984;252:2023-2027.
FREE FULL TEXT
64. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, et al. Effects of organizational change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. JAMA. 1996;276:322-328.
FREE FULL TEXT
65. Manthous C, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Al-Kharrat T, et al. Effects of a medical intensivist on patient care in a community teaching hospital. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72:391-399.
ABSTRACT
66. Young MP, Birkmeyer JD. Potential reduction in mortality rates using an intensivist model to manage intensive care units. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:284-289.
PUBMED
67. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, et al. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284:2762-2770.
FREE FULL TEXT
68. Kelley MA. The hospitalist: a new medical specialty? Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:373-375.
FREE FULL TEXT
69. Goldman L. The impact of hospitalists on academia and medical education. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:364-367.
FREE FULL TEXT
70. Hauer KE, Wachter RM. Implications of the hospitalist model for medical students' education. Acad Med. 2001;76:324-330.
ISI
| PUBMED
71. Saint S, Matthay MA. Risk reduction in the intensive care unit. Am J Med. 1998;105:515-523.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
72. Pantilat SZ, Alpers A, Wachter RM. Ethical issues in hospitalist systems. JAMA. 1999;282:171-174.
FREE FULL TEXT
73. Falk CT, Miller C. Hospitalist Programs: Towards a New Practice of Inpatient Care. Washington, DC: Advisory Board Company; 1998:1-59.
74. Wachter RM. The benefits of using hospitalists. Health Forum J. 2001;44:34-36.
PUBMED
75. Wachter RM, Whitcomb WF, Nelson JR. Financial implications of implementing a hospitalist program. Healthc Financ Manage. 1999;53:48-51.
PUBMED
76. Melzer SM, Molteni RA, Marcuse EK, Rivara FP. Characteristics and financial performance of a pediatric faculty inpatient attending service: a resource-based relative value scale analysis. Pediatrics. 2001;108:79-84.
FREE FULL TEXT
77. Schroeder SA, Schapiro R. The hospitalist: new boon for internal medicine or retreat from primary care? Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:382-387.
FREE FULL TEXT
78. Wachter RM, Goldman L, Hollander H. Hospital Medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
79. Goldman L. Specialized tracks, or one size does not fit all! ABIM Report. 2000:57-61.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
January 23/30, 2002
JAMA. 2002;287(4):527-528.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Academic Year-End Transfers of Outpatients From Outgoing to Incoming Residents: An Unaddressed Patient Safety Issue
Young and Wachter
JAMA 2009;302:1327-1329.
FULL TEXT
Hospitalists and the Quality of Care in Hospitals
Lopez et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1389-1394.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Growth in Care Provided by Hospitalists
Wachter et al.
NEJM 2009;360:2789-2791.
FULL TEXT
The Growth of Hospitalists and the Changing Face of Primary Care
Hamel et al.
NEJM 2009;360:1141-1143.
FULL TEXT
Tailoring Internal Medicine Training to Improve Hospitalist Outcomes
Glasheen and Cumbler
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:204-205.
FULL TEXT
Continuity of Care and Intensive Care Unit Use at the End of Life
Sharma et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:81-86.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Staff-Only Pediatric Hospitalist Care of Patients With Medically Complex Subspecialty Conditions in a Major Teaching Hospital
Bekmezian et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:975-980.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
US Residency Training Before and After the 1997 Balanced Budget Act
Salsberg et al.
JAMA 2008;300:1174-1180.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Are inpatients' needs better served by hospitalists than by their family doctors: YES
Samoil
cfp 2008;54:1100-1101.
FULL TEXT
Les hospitaliers repondent-ils mieux aux besoins des patients hospitalises que leurs medecins de famille?: OUI
Samoil
cfp 2008;54:1104-1106.
FULL TEXT
Rebuttal
Williams
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1259-1259.
FULL TEXT
Invited Article: Is it time for neurohospitalists?
Freeman et al.
Neurology 2008;70:1282-1288.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Future of General Surgery
Maa et al.
JAMA 2008;299:1015-1015.
FULL TEXT
Outcomes of Care by Hospitalists, General Internists, and Family Physicians
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;357:2589-2600.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Hospitalist Movement -- Time to Move On
McMahon
NEJM 2007;357:2627-2629.
FULL TEXT
Hospitalist Care and Length of Stay in Patients Requiring Complex Discharge Planning and Close Clinical Monitoring
Southern et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1869-1874.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality and Quantity: Gauging the Effects of the New ACGME Program Requirements for Inpatient Psychiatric Education
Walaszek
Acad. Psychiatry 2007;31:261-265.
FULL TEXT
Impact of a Hospitalist System on Length of Stay and Cost for Children With Common Conditions
Srivastava et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:267-274.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Characteristics of the Pediatric Hospitalist Workforce: Its Roles and Work Environment
Freed et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:33-39.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Spectrum of Community-Based Hospitalist Practice: A Call to Tailor Internal Medicine Residency Training
Glasheen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:727-728.
FULL TEXT
The Declining Number and Variety of Procedures Done by General Internists: A Resurvey of Members of the American College of Physicians
Wigton and Alguire
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:355-360.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care Physicians: Implications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care
Kripalani et al.
JAMA 2007;297:831-841.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Emergency care in the first 48 hours
Leman
BMJ 2007;334:218-219.
FULL TEXT
House Staff Team Workload and Organization Effects on Patient Outcomes in an Academic General Internal Medicine Inpatient Service
Ong et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:47-52.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Outcome Measures for a Traditional Pediatric Faculty Service and Nonfaculty Hospitalist Services in a Community Teaching Hospital
Boyd et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1327-1331.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Represcription After Adverse Drug Reaction in the Elderly: A Descriptive Study.
van der Linden et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1666-1667.
FULL TEXT
A Systematic Review of Pediatric Hospitalists
Pate
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;16:21-22.
FULL TEXT
Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review.
Kaboli et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:955-964.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatric Hospitalists: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Landrigan et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1736-1744.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatric Hospitalists: Report of a Leadership Conference
Lye et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1122-1130.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Volume, quality of care, and outcome in pneumonia.
Lindenauer et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:262-269.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
An Alternative Approach to Reducing the Costs of Patient Care? A Controlled Trial of the Multi-Disciplinary Doctor-Nurse Practitioner (MDNP) Model
Ettner et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:9-17.
ABSTRACT
The Impact of Hospitalists on the Cost and Quality of Inpatient Care in the United States: A Research Synthesis
Coffman and Rundall
Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:379-406.
ABSTRACT
Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital Discharge
Roy et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:121-128.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Community and Hospital-Based Physicians' Attitudes Regarding Pediatric Hospitalist Systems
Srivastava et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:34-38.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of a Staff-Only Hospitalist System in a Tertiary Care, Academic Children's Hospital
Dwight et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1545-1549.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A 39-Year-Old Man With Anasarca
Mahmud et al.
Chest 2004;126:1683-1686.
FULL TEXT
Lost in Transition: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Transitional Care
Coleman and Berenson
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:533-536.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Hospitalist Attending Physicians on Trainee Satisfaction With Teaching and With Internal Medicine Rotations
Hauer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1866-1871.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physicians and Medical Groups
Town et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:80S-118S.
ABSTRACT
Medical and Surgical Comanagement after Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Huddleston et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:28-38.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care Pediatrics: 2004 and Beyond
Cheng
Pediatrics 2004;113:1802-1809.
FULL TEXT
Hospitalists in the United States -- Mission Accomplished or Work in Progress?
Wachter
NEJM 2004;350:1935-1936.
FULL TEXT
Health Care System Chaos Should Spur Innovation: Summary of a Report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine
Larson and the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Ta
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:639-643.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Health Care Becomes an Industry
Rastegar
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:79-83.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
How Physicians Perceive Hospitalist Services After Implementation: Anticipation vs Reality
Auerbach et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2330-2336.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Trends in Career Choice by US Medical School Graduates
Newton and Grayson
JAMA 2003;290:1179-1182.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Communication helps reduce risks for hospitalists, PCPs
Maggioni
AAP News 2003;23:60-60.
FULL TEXT
Outreach critical care
Hillman and Cuthbertson
Br J Anaesth 2003;90:808-809.
FULL TEXT
Training on the internal medicine teaching wards
Flegel and Palepu
CMAJ 2003;168:997-998.
FULL TEXT
Primary care in the United States: Organisation of primary care in the United States
Bindman and Majeed
BMJ 2003;326:631-634.
FULL TEXT
Intensivist Consultation and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients
Wachter
JAMA 2003;289:986-986.
FULL TEXT
Primary Care Medicine in Crisis: Toward Reconstruction and Renewal
Moore and Showstack
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:244-247.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care in a New Era: Disillusion and Dissolution?
Sandy and Schroeder
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:262-267.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Hospitalization from Hell: A Patient's Perspective on Quality
Cleary
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:33-39.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Implementation of a Voluntary Hospitalist Service at a Community Teaching Hospital: Improved Clinical Efficiency and Patient Outcomes
Auerbach et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:859-865.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Who, What, When, Where, Whom, and How of Hospitalist Care
The Editors
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:930-931.
FULL TEXT
What Is an Academic General Internist?: Career Options and Training Pathways
Levinson and Linzer
JAMA 2002;288:2045-2048.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Commentary
Aiken
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:215-222.
Advantages and Limitations of the Hospitalist Movement
Applebaum et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2073-2076.
FULL TEXT
|
