 |
|
Homocysteine and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke
A Meta-analysis
Homocysteine Studies Collaboration
JAMA. 2002;288:2015-2022.
ABSTRACT
| |
Context It has been suggested that total blood homocysteine concentrations are associated with the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke.
Objective To assess the relationship of homocysteine concentrations with vascular disease risk.
Data Sources MEDLINE was searched for articles published from January 1966 to January 1999. Relevant studies were identified by systematic searches of the literature for all reported observational studies of associations between IHD or stroke risk and homocysteine concentrations. Additional studies were identified by a hand search of references of original articles or review articles and by personal communication with relevant investigators.
Study Selection Studies were included if they had data available by January 1999 on total blood homocysteine concentrations, sex, and age at event. Studies were excluded if they measured only blood concentrations of free homocysteine or of homocysteine after a methionine-loading test or if relevant clinical data were unavailable or incomplete.
Data Extraction Data from 30 prospective or retrospective studies involving a total of 5073 IHD events and 1113 stroke events were included in a meta-analysis of individual participant data, with allowance made for differences between studies, for confounding by known cardiovascular risk factors, and for regression dilution bias. Combined odds ratios (ORs) for the association of IHD and stroke with blood homocysteine concentrations were obtained by using conditional logistic regression.
Data Synthesis Stronger associations were observed in retrospective studies of homocysteine measured in blood collected after the onset of disease than in prospective studies among individuals who had no history of cardiovascular disease when blood was collected. After adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors and regression dilution bias in the prospective studies, a 25% lower usual (corrected for regression dilution bias) homocysteine level (about 3 µmol/L [0.41 mg/L]) was associated with an 11% (OR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.96) lower IHD risk and 19% (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) lower stroke risk.
Conclusions This meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that elevated homocysteine is at most a modest independent predictor of IHD and stroke risk in healthy populations. Studies of the impact on disease risk of genetic variants that affect blood homocysteine concentrations will help determine whether homocysteine is causally related to vascular disease, as may large randomized trials of the effects on IHD and stroke of vitamin supplementation to lower blood homocysteine concentrations.
INTRODUCTION
The hypothesis that elevated blood concentrations of the sulfur-containing amino acid homocysteine may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease was suggested by the observation that children with homozygous homocystinuria, a rare inborn error of metabolism causing markedly elevated blood total homocysteine concentrations, had a high incidence of premature occlusive vascular disease.1 The initial epidemiological evidence in support of this hypothesis came from retrospective case-control studies.2-4 More recently, however, inconsistent results have been reported from prospective observational studies, including cohort and nested case-control studies, with some showing highly significant associations but others showing none.5
The aim of this collaborative meta-analysis was to combine individual participant data from all relevant observational studies to produce reliable estimates of the associations of total plasma homocysteine with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke, with adjustment for confounding caused by known cardiovascular risk factors and correction for regression dilution caused by random variation in homocysteine measurements.6-7 The chief emphasis in this report is on combined analyses of the prospective studies (which involve the measurement of homocysteine in blood collected before the onset of disease) rather than on the retrospective studies, since the former should be less prone to artifacts produced by any effects of preexisting vascular disease on homocysteine levels (referred to as reverse causality).
METHODS
Study Populations
Relevant studies were identified by systematic searches of the scientific literature for all reported observational studies of associations between IHD or stroke risk and homocysteine concentrations (using the terms coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, stroke, cardiovascular disease, homocysteine or homocyst(e)ine, and hyperhomocystinemia). We searched the MEDLINE database for articles published from January 1966 to January 1999 and identified additional studies by hand-searching references of original articles or review articles on this topic and by personal contact with relevant investigators in that period. Studies were included if they had data available by January 1999 on total blood homocysteine concentrations, sex, age at entry (for prospective studies), and age at event (G. S. Omenn, unpublished data, September 2002).8-37 Studies were excluded if they measured only blood concentrations of free homocysteine or of total homocysteine only after a methionine-loading test3, 38-40 or if relevant data were unavailable41-48 or incomplete.49-51 To avoid confounding by disease, prospective studies of participants selected on the basis of existing cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, or some other disease were also excluded,52-56 as were participants with preexisting cardiovascular disease in prospective studies of apparently healthy populations.
Data Collection
Investigators who agreed to collaborate were asked to provide data for each participant on date of birth, sex, blood homocysteine concentration (with the date of blood collection), any nonfatal or fatal myocardial infarction or occlusive coronary artery disease, and any nonfatal or fatal stroke or transient cerebral ischemic attack (with the dates of all such events). If available, data were also collected on history of heart disease event, prior cerebrovascular disease event, diabetes mellitus, smoking (current vs not), alcohol consumption, blood concentrations of total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and of creatinine, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, weight, and height. Studies were classified as prospective if the blood sample used to measure homocysteine was collected before the IHD or stroke event (whether homocysteine was measured in all individuals or in a nested manner among cases and matched controls) and as retrospective if the blood sample was collected after the event in cases. Retrospective studies were further classified as population-based if the controls were selected randomly from the same source population as the cases or as other if the controls were spouse controls or patients with some other illness.
Statistical Analyses
Cases and controls were restricted to people who were at least 40 years of age at baseline (ie, when the blood sample for homocysteine measurement was taken) and had measured homocysteine concentrations between 3 and 40 µmol/L (0.41 and 5.41 mg/L). Analyses were conducted for all ages together and for 3 age-at-event bands (40-54, 55-64, and  65 years), with prospective and retrospective studies considered separately to assess the possible impact of reverse causality and of any bias caused by control selection or participation.57 Results from prospective studies in which all participants had had homocysteine measured in a baseline sample were combined with those from prospective studies in which only the cases and a matched random sample of controls had had homocysteine measured in a baseline sample (ie, nested case-control studies). For prospective studies that provided data as nested case-control studies, the controls originally used for each case were retained in this study. For the other prospective studies, up to 8 controls per case were selected in each age-at-event band (matched for sex and age at baseline in 5-year bands), with age at last follow-up having to be greater than the lower limit of the age-at-event band. Controls could be selected only once within an age-at-event band but could be selected again for a later age-at-event band. For anyone experiencing multiple vascular events, only the first event was considered.
All analyses were based on logarithmically transformed homocysteine values because homocysteine values are positively skewed, with log2 used so that a unit increase in log2 of homocysteine is equivalent to a doubling in homocysteine. Conditional logistic regression analyses stratified for study were used 2 ways to describe the dose-response relationships. First, to investigate the shape of the association, the odds ratios (ORs) for groups defined by quintiles of baseline values of homocysteine within each study were calculated, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated from floated variances reflecting the amount of information underlying each group (including the reference group).58 Second, assuming a log-linear association, regression coefficients were calculated for the percentage of difference in risk associated with a 25% lower homocysteine concentration (which is equivalent to the average change in plasma total homocysteine concentration achieved by folic acid supplementation).59 Heterogeneity between the results of prospective and retrospective study designs and between studies within each type of design was assessed by a  2 statistic. Heterogeneity between the results of prospective studies was investigated with respect to mean age at baseline, percentage of men, percentage of current smokers, mean homocysteine concentrations in controls, and mean time between blood collection and vascular events. Analyses of the prospective studies were adjusted for the effects of smoking (tobacco use vs not), total cholesterol level, and systolic blood pressure by using multivariable logistic regression, with the stepwise change in the 2 statistic after making these adjustments providing a quantitative indication of the potential confounding effects of these factors. All analyses were performed with SAS version 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
Correction for Regression Dilution Bias
The analyses of the prospective studies relate vascular disease risk to the estimated usual concentrations of homocysteine at approximately the time of the event by using remeasurements of homocysteine in samples collected at an appropriate interval after baseline to correct for regression dilution.6-7 Random fluctuations in a measured value of homocysteine will underestimate the strength of the real association between the usual (ie, long-term average) level of homocysteine during a particular exposure period and disease. This so-called regression dilution effect may be caused by measurement error or transient fluctuations in homocysteine levels caused by treatment, disease, age, or changes in diet. Information from repeated homocysteine measurements in a representative sample of individuals can be used to correct for the effects of regression dilution. Most of the studies did not have such repeat measurements of homocysteine, but 3 studies involving a total of 2318 individuals had remeasured participants at 3 to 8 years after baseline,60-62 and 1 other study had done so in 500 individuals at 3, 6, 9, and 12 years.63 Baseline measurements of homocysteine were used to divide people into quintiles, and the ratio of the range between the mean values of the repeat measurements in the top vs the bottom quintile to the range of the baseline measurements was used to estimate regression dilution ratios for various intervals. The regression dilution ratio declined with increasing intervals between measurements,6 with a value of 0.75 for the mean interval of 5 years from the initial homocysteine measurement to IHD events in prospective studies and of 0.77 for the mean interval of 4 years to stroke events. In the retrospective studies, homocysteine was measured at or shortly after the event, so a regression dilution ratio of 0.83 (which makes allowance for short-term variability only) was used for IHD and stroke analyses. The regression coefficient (and its SE) relating risk to usual concentrations of homocysteine was then estimated as the uncorrected regression coefficient (and its SE) that related risk to single measurements of baseline homocysteine concentrations (1 divided by the regression dilution ratio).
RESULTS
Study Populations
Individual participant data were obtained for 30 studies, which include 18 of 28 eligible retrospective studies and 12 of 13 eligible prospective studies (Table 1). Of 5073 IHD events, 1968 came from prospective studies, 2496 from retrospective studies with population controls, and 609 from retrospective studies with other controls. Of 1113 stroke events, 463 came from prospective studies, 344 from retrospective studies with population controls, and 306 from retrospective studies with other controls. The median (and interquartile range [IQR]) (SD) homocysteine level among controls in the different studies varied from 7.8 µmol/L (1.05 mg/L; IQR, 7.0-8.9) to 14.3 µmol/L (1.93 mg/L; IQR, 12.3-17.0), with an overall median of 11.0 µmol/L (1.49 mg/L; IQR, 9.0-13.6) (SD, 4.2 µmol/L [0.57 mg/L]). Eighty-five percent of the participants were men (88% in prospective studies, 83% in retrospective studies with population controls, and 73% in retrospective studies with other controls), and 36% were current smokers (41%, 31%, and 24%, respectively). In the prospective studies, the mean age at IHD was 62 years (SD, 8 years), and these events occurred at an average of 5 years (range, 2-9 years) after baseline. The mean age at stroke was 68 years (SD, 11 years) in prospective studies, and these events occurred at an average of 4 years (range, 2-11 years) after baseline. The mean age of IHD cases in retrospective studies with population controls was 53 years (SD, 7 years); in retrospective studies with other controls, 59 years (SD, 10 years); and of stroke cases, 61 years (SD, 16 years) and 63 years (SD, 9 years), respectively.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies*
|
|
|
Risks of IHD in Relation to Differences in Homocysteine Levels
Before correction for regression dilution, the ORs for IHD associated with a 25% lower baseline homocysteine level after adjustment for study, age, and sex were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.92) in prospective studies, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.75) in retrospective studies with population controls, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) in retrospective studies with other controls. There was significant heterogeneity between the results from these study designs (22 = 27; P<.001), which was attenuated only slightly by correction for regression dilution (22 = 21; P<.001). After correction for regression dilution (separately within each study), the adjusted ORs for IHD associated with a 25% lower usual homocysteine level were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) in prospective studies, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71) in retrospective studies with population controls, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.83) in retrospective studies with other controls (Figure 1). Among the prospective studies, there was only marginally significant heterogeneity between the adjusted ORs for IHD (210 = 21; P = .02) after correction for regression dilution, with a slight trend toward attenuation of the ORs with increasing mean time to event in the studies (test for trend, 21 = 4.1; P = .04). In contrast with previous suggestions,27 however, there was no evidence that the association of homocysteine level with IHD was influenced by age, sex, smoking, levels of blood pressure or blood cholesterol (Figure 2), or mean homocysteine concentrations in controls (or size of study, which might have reflected a tendency not to report small studies with less extreme findings).
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Odds Ratios of Ischemic Heart Disease for a 25% Lower Usual Homocysteine Level in Individual Studies
Data were adjusted for study, sex, and age at enrollment and were corrected for regression dilution. The size of the square is inversely proportional to the variance of the log odds ratio (OR). The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The combined ORs in the subtotals for each study design and their 95% CIs are indicated by the diamonds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. Odds Ratios of Ischemic Heart Disease for a 25% Lower Usual Homocysteine Level Among People in Prospective Studies
Data were adjusted for study, sex, and age at enrollment. Studies are grouped by age at event, sex, smoking, and quintiles of systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol level. A global test for heterogeneity between all of these subgroups was not significant (216 = 14; P = .60). Symbols and conventions are as for Figure 1. To convert cholesterol to mmol/L, multiply by 0.02586. OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
|
|
|
Homocysteine concentrations were correlated with current smoking, total cholesterol levels, and systolic blood pressure, and the study-, age-, and sex-adjusted ORs for IHD in prospective studies were attenuated after further adjustment for these risk factors in individuals with all relevant data (to 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.96]) (Table 2). The substantial change in the 2 statistic with these adjustments (from 24 to 9) suggests that a large part of the association was due to confounding. Moreover, because these confounding factors will necessarily have been measured with some error, substantial residual confounding will remain.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Odds Ratios for Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and for Stroke Associated With 25% Lower Usual Homocysteine Levels in Prospective Studies
|
|
|
Table 3 compares ORs of IHD in quintiles of homocysteine levels determined separately within each study before combined analyses. The study-, age-, and sex-adjusted ORs of IHD appeared to increase with increasing homocysteine concentrations in a graded relationship, but this pattern was attenuated after further adjustment for current smoking, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol levels.
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of Ischemic Heart Disease for Quintiles of Baseline Homocysteine Levels in Prospective Studies*
|
|
|
Risk of Stroke in Relation to Differences in Homocysteine Concentrations
After adjustment for study, age, and sex and correction for regression dilution, the ORs for stroke were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.90) in prospective studies, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.73-1.01) in retrospective studies with population controls, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30-0.70) in retrospective studies with other controls (Figure 3). The heterogeneity between the results from these designs for stroke (22 = 7.4; P = .02) was less extreme than that observed for IHD. Among the prospective studies, there was no significant heterogeneity between the adjusted ORs for stroke (27 = 13; P = .06), and there was no good evidence that the association of homocysteine level with stroke was influenced by age or sex. As for IHD, there was a substantial reduction in the 2 statistic (from 11 to 6) for the association of homocysteine level with stroke risk after further adjustment for current smoking, systolic blood pressure, and cholesterol level (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) (Table 2), suggesting that confounding may have inflated the estimated strength of this association.
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. Odds Ratios of Stroke for a 25% Lower Homocysteine Level in Individual Studies
Data were adjusted for study, sex, and age at enrollment and were corrected for regression dilution. Symbols and conventions are as for Figure 1. OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
|
|
|
COMMENT
This meta-analysis indicates that homocysteine level is less strongly related to IHD and stroke risk in healthy populations than has been suggested.4 The chief strength of this study is that inclusion of data from individual participants has allowed adjustment for possible confounding caused by known cardiovascular risk factors and appropriate correction for regression dilution bias. Data from 1 prospective study of homocysteine and cardiovascular disease (involving 244 cases)48 that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were unavailable, as were data from 5 relevant prospective studies that were completed after January 1999 (involving about 600 IHD cases and 50 stroke cases).64-68 These prospective studies reported results similar to those of the prospective studies that were included in this study (based on 1968 IHD cases and 463 strokes), suggesting that our findings were probably not materially altered by their exclusion.
The risks of IHD and stroke associated with homocysteine level were significantly weaker in the prospective studies than the retrospective studies, which may reflect bias in retrospective studies because of the difficulties of selecting appropriate controls or the effects of changes in treatment, renal function, or other factors after the onset of disease that produce increases in homocysteine concentrations among the cases. To minimize such bias, the chief emphasis in this study was on the results from prospective studies (in which blood for homocysteine measurements had been collected before the clinical onset of disease) among individuals with no recorded history of cardiovascular disease at enrollment. The risks of IHD associated with given differences in homocysteine level observed in the prospective studies of such individuals were remarkably consistent, with the exception of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.13 The reasons for the apparent discrepancy in that study are unclear, although the mean time from baseline homocysteine measurement to IHD events was about twice that of the other prospective studies.13 Homocysteine concentrations were strongly correlated with current smoking and systolic blood pressure, and the strength of the association of homocysteine with vascular disease was reduced substantially after adjustment for these known cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, because these confounding factors will necessarily have been measured with some error, substantial residual confounding may well remain. Indeed, because systolic blood pressure (on remeasurement a few years later) has a self-correlation of only about two-thirds,7 adjustment of the relationship between homocysteine and vascular disease should reduce the 2 value by about two thirds, as full adjustment for usual blood pressure would have done. Hence, the results in Table 2 are also consistent with the suggestion that the relationship of homocysteine to disease is largely due to confounding by the usual blood pressure. Thus, among prospective studies of individuals with no history of cardiovascular disease, and after appropriate adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors and correction for regression dilution bias, a 25% lower usual homocysteine level was associated with about an 11% lower IHD risk and about a 19% lower stroke risk.
If the modest associations observed in this study are causal, then the implications for public health of decreasing the population mean levels of homocysteine could still be substantial. Studies of genetic variants affecting blood homocysteine concentrations and risk of IHD may well help to assess the nature of this association.69-70 Individuals who have a C-to-T substitution at base 677 (amino acid change alanine 222 valine) of the gene that encodes the methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase enzyme have reduced enzyme activity and, as a consequence, have homocysteine levels that are about 25% higher than those with the CC genotype.70-71 An accompanying article in THE JOURNAL (2002;288:2023-2031) describes a meta-analysis of 40 studies of this genetic polymorphism in which individuals with the TT polymorphism have a 16% (95% CI, 5%-28%) higher risk of IHD than those with the CC polymorphism.72 The concordance of the IHD risks associated with genetically determined differences in homocysteine and of those observed in the population studies of such homocysteine differences provides support for these associations being causal.69 Results from large randomized trials of the effects on vascular disease of lowering homocysteine with folic acid–based vitamin supplementation should provide further information about the relevance of homocysteine levels to the risks of IHD and stroke.73
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Funding/Support: This project was supported in part by the British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, and by European Union BIOMED demonstration grant BMH4-98-3549 (Dr Clarke).
Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Clarke, Hopkins, Omenn, Beresford, Kromhout, Elwood, Whincup, Silberberg.
Acquisition of data: Clarke, Alfthan, Tuomilehto, Arnesen, Bonaa, Blacher, Boers, Bots, Grobbee, Brattström, Breteler, Hofman, Chambers, Kooner, Coull, Evans, Evers, Folsom, Freyburger, Parrot, Genest Jr, Dalery, Graham, Hoogeveen, Stehouwer, Hopkins, Jacques, Selhub, Luft, Jungers, Lindgren, Lolin, Loehrer, Fowler, Mansoor, Malinow, Ducimetiere, Nygard, Refsum, Ueland, Omenn, Roseman, Parving, Gall, Perry, Ebrahim, Shaper, Robinson, Jacobsen, Schwartz, Siscovick, Stampfer, Hennekens, Feskens, Kromhout, Ubbink, Elwood, Verhoef, von Eckardstein, Schulte, Assmann, Wald, Whincup, Wilcken, Sherliker, Linksted, Davey Smith, Silberberg.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Clarke, Collins, Lewington, Donald, Alfthan, Bostom, Brattström, Kuller, Daly, Kostense, Stehouwer, Jacques, Lindgren, Fowler, Vollset, Omenn, Schwartz, Siscovick, Hennekens, Feskens, Kromhout, Pickering, Wald, Law, Silberberg.
Drafting of the manuscript: Clarke, Collins, Lewington, Donald, Bostom, Evans, Genest Jr, Sherliker, Linksted.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Clarke, Collins, Lewington, Alfthan, Tuomilehto, Bonaa, Blacher, Boers, Bots, Grobbee, Brattström, Breteler, Hofman, Kooner, Coull, Kuller, Evers, Folsom, Freyburger, Parrot, Genest Jr, Graham, Daly, Hoogeveen, Kostense, Stehouwer, Hopkins, Jacques, Selhub, Jungers, Lindgren, Lolin, Loehrer, Fowler, Mansoor, Malinow, Ducimetiere, Nygard, Refsum, Vollset, Ueland, Omenn, Beresford, Roseman, Parving, Gall, Perry, Ebrahim, Shaper, Robinson, Jacobsen, Schwartz, Siscovick, Stampfer, Hennekens, Feskens, Kromhout, Pickering, Verhoef, von Eckardstein, Schulte, Assmann, Wald, Law, Whincup, Wilcken, Davey Smith.
Statistical expertise: Clarke, Collins, Lewington, Donald, Bots, Daly, Hoogeveen, Kostense, Hopkins, Jacques, Ducimetiere, Vollset, Stampfer, Hennekens, Feskens, Pickering, Verhoef, Wald, Sherliker, Silberberg.
Obtained funding: Tuomilehto, Blacher, Bots, Grobbee, Genest Jr, Loehrer, Roseman, Ebrahim, Feskens, Kromhout, Whincup.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Clarke, Tuomilehto, Hofman, Evans, Evers, Genest Jr, Dalery, Hopkins, Luft, Lolin, Refsum, Ueland, Omenn, Parving, Perry, Ebrahim, Stampfer, Hennekens, Feskens, von Eckardstein, Schulte, Assmann, Linksted.
Study supervision: Clarke, Collins, Lewington, Alfthan, Brattström, Hofman, Stehouwer, Luft, Loehrer, Nygard, Kromhout, Whincup, Linksted.
Additional Collaborators of the Homocysteine Studies Collaboration: J. C. M. Witteman; B. Israelsson; G. Sexton; L. L. Wu; R. Joubran; B. Norrving, B. Hultberg, A. Andersson, B. B. Johansson; C. Bergmark, A. M. Svardal; A. E. Evans; N. Pancharuniti, C. A. Lewis; R. Holman, I. Stratton, C. Johnston; and J. Morris.
Corresponding Author and Reprints: Robert Clarke, MD, Clinical Trial Service Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, England (e-mail: robert.clarke{at}ctsu.ox.ac.uk).
Author Members of the Homocysteine Studies Collaboration: R. Clarke, MD, R. Collins, MB, S. Lewington, DPhil, A. Donald, PhD; G. Alfthan, MD, J. Tuomilehto, MD; E. Arnesen, MD, K. Bonaa, MD; J. Blacher, MD; G. H. J. Boers, MD; A. Bostom, MD; M. L. Bots, MD, D. E. Grobbee, MD; L. Brattström, MD; M. M. B. Breteler, MD, A. Hofman, MD; J. C. Chambers, MRCP, J. S. Kooner, FRCP; B. M. Coull, MD; R. W. Evans, PhD, L. H. Kuller; S. Evers, MD; A. R. Folsom, MD; G. Freyburger, MD, F. Parrot, MD; J. Genest Jr, MD, K. Dalery, MD; I. M. Graham, MD, L. Daly, PhD; E. K. Hoogeveen, MD, P. J. Kostense, PhD, C. D. A. Stehouwer, MD; P. N. Hopkins, MD; P. Jacques, ScD, J. Selhub, PhD; F. C. Luft, MD; P. Jungers, MD; A. Lindgren, MD; Y. I. Lolin, MD; F. Loehrer, MD, B. Fowler, PhD; M. A. Mansoor, MD; M. R. Malinow, MD, P. Ducimetiere, MD; O. Nygard, MD, H. Refsum, MD, S. E. Vollset, MD, P. M. Ueland, MD; G. S. Omenn, MD, S. A. A. Beresford, PhD; J. M. Roseman, MD; H. H. Parving, MD, M. A. Gall, MD; I. J. Perry, MD, S. B. Ebrahim, MD, A. G. Shaper, MD; K. Robinson, MD, D. W. Jacobsen, PhD; S. M. Schwartz, PhD; D. S. Siscovick, MD; M. J. Stampfer, MD, C. H. Hennekens, MD; E. J. M. Feskens, D. Kromhout, PhD; J. Ubbink, MD, P. Elwood, MD, J. Pickering, MSc; P. Verhoef, PhD; A. von Eckardstein, MD, H. Schulte, PhD, G. Assmann, MD; N. Wald, FRCP, M. R. Law, FRCP; P. H. Whincup, FRCP; D. E. L. Wilcken, MD; P. Sherliker, BSc; P. Linksted, MSc; and G. Davey Smith.
REFERENCES
| |
1. McCully KS. Vascular pathology of homocysteinemia. Am J Pathol. 1969;56:111-128.
ISI
| PUBMED
2. Wilcken DE, Wilcken B. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 1976;57:1079-1082.
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Clarke R, Daly L, Robinson K, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1149-1155.
ABSTRACT
4. Boushey CJ, Beresford SA, Omenn GS, Motulsky AG. A quantitative assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease. JAMA. 1995;274:1049-1057.
ABSTRACT
5. Danesh J, Lewington S. Plasma homocysteine and coronary heart disease. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1998;5:229-232.
PUBMED
6. Clarke R, Lewington S, Donald A, et al. Underestimation of the importance of homocysteine as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in epidemiological studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001;8:363-369.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
7. Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, et al. Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:341-353.
FREE FULL TEXT
8. Stampfer MJ, Malinow MR, Willett WC, et al. A prospective study of plasma homocyst(e)ine and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians. JAMA. 1992;268:877-881.
ABSTRACT
9. Verhoef P, Hennekens CH, Malinow MR, Kok FJ, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. A prospective study of plasma homocyst(e)ine and risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1924-1930.
ABSTRACT
10. Alfthan G, Pekkanen J, Jauhiainen M, et al. Relation of serum homocysteine and lipoprotein(a) concentrations to atherosclerotic disease in a prospective Finnish population based study. Atherosclerosis. 1994;106:9-19.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
11. Arnesen E, Refsum H, Bonaa KH, Ueland PM, Forde OH, Nordrehaug JE. Serum total homocysteine and coronary heart disease. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:704-709.
FREE FULL TEXT
12. Perry IJ, Refsum H, Morris RW, Ebrahim SB, Ueland PM, Shaper AG. Prospective study of serum total homocysteine concentration and risk of stroke in middle-aged British men. Lancet. 1995;346:1395-1398.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
13. Evans RW, Shaten BJ, Hempel JD, Cutler JA, Kuller LH. Homocyst(e)ine and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1947-1953.
FREE FULL TEXT
14. Ubbink JB, Fehily AM, Pickering J, Elwood PC, Vermaak WJ. Homocysteine and ischaemic heart disease in the Caerphilly cohort. Atherosclerosis. 1998;140:349-356.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Stehouwer CD, Weijenberg MP, van den Berg M, Jakobs C, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Serum homocysteine and risk of coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease in elderly men: a 10-year follow-up. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1895-1901.
FREE FULL TEXT
16. Folsom AR, Nieto FJ, McGovern PG, et al. Prospective study of coronary heart disease incidence in relation to fasting total homocysteine, related genetic polymorphisms, and B vitamins: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 1998;98:204-210.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Wald NJ, Watt HC, Law MR, Weir DG, McPartlin J, Scott JM. Homocysteine and ischemic heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:862-867.
FREE FULL TEXT
18. Bots ML, Launer LJ, Lindemans J, et al. Homocysteine and short-term risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:38-44.
FREE FULL TEXT
19. Whincup PH, Refsum H, Perry IJ, et al. Serum total homocysteine and coronary heart disease: prospective study in middle-aged men. Heart. 1999;82:448-454.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. Genest JJ Jr, McNamara JR, Salem DN, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ, Malinow MR. Plasma homocyst(e)ine levels in men with premature coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1114-1119.
ABSTRACT
21. Pancharuniti N, Lewis CA, Sauberlich HE, et al. Plasma homocyst(e)ine, folate, and vitamin B-12 concentrations and risk for early-onset coronary artery disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:940-948.
FREE FULL TEXT
22. von Eckardstein A, Malinow MR, Upson B, et al. Effects of age, lipoproteins, and hemostatic parameters on the role of homocyst(e)inemia as a cardiovascular risk factor in men. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:460-464.
FREE FULL TEXT
23. Hopkins PN, Wu LL, Wu J, et al. Higher plasma homocyst(e)ine and increased susceptibility to adverse effects of low folate in early familial coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1314-1320.
FREE FULL TEXT
24. Lindgren A, Brattstrom L, Norrving B, Hultberg B, Andersson A, Johansson BB. Plasma homocysteine in the acute and convalescent phases after stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:795-800.
FREE FULL TEXT
25. Verhoef P, Stampfer MJ, Buring JE, et al. Homocysteine metabolism and risk of myocardial infarction. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:845-859.
FREE FULL TEXT
26. Malinow MR, Ducimetiere P, Luc G, et al. Plasma homocyst(e)ine levels and graded risk for myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 1996;126:27-34.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
27. Graham IM, Daly LE, Refsum HM, et al. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease: the European Concerted Action Project. JAMA. 1997;277:1775-1781.
ABSTRACT
28. Silberberg J, Crooks R, Fryer J, et al. Gender differences and other determinants of the rise in plasma homocysteine after L-methionine loading. Atherosclerosis. 1997;133:105-110.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
29. Verhoef P, Kok FJ, Kruyssen DA, et al. Plasma total homocysteine, B vitamins, and risk of coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:989-995.
FREE FULL TEXT
30. Schwartz SM, Siscovick DS, Malinow MR, et al. Myocardial infarction in young women in relation to plasma total homocysteine, folate, and a common variant in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. Circulation. 1997;96:412-417.
FREE FULL TEXT
31. Joubran R, Asmi M, Busjahn A, Vergopoulos A, Luft FC, Jouma M. Homocysteine levels and coronary heart disease in Syria. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1998;5:257-261.
FULL TEXT
| PUBMED
32. Chambers JC, Obeid OA, Refsum H, et al. Plasma homocysteine concentrations and risk of coronary heart disease in UK Indian, Asian and European men. Lancet. 2000;355:523-527.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Coull BM, Malinow MR, Beamer N, Sexton G, Nordt F, de Garmo P. Elevated plasma homocyst(e)ine concentration as a possible independent risk factor for stroke. Stroke. 1990;21:572-576.
FREE FULL TEXT
34. Dalery K, Lussier Cacan S, Selhub J, Davignon J, Latour Y, Genest J Jr. Homocysteine and coronary artery disease in French Canadian subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1107-1111.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
35. Robinson K, Mayer EL, Miller DP, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and low pyridoxal phosphate. Circulation. 1995;92:2825-2830.
FREE FULL TEXT
36. Lolin YI, Sanderson JE, Cheng SK, et al. Hyperhomocysteinaemia and premature coronary artery disease in the Chinese. Heart. 1996;76:117-122.
|
