 |
 |

Policies for Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens Among US-Based International Voluntary Medical Organizations
To the Editor: Health care workers who spend
time in developing countries are at increased risk of infectious diseases
from occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) due to lack of personal
protective equipment, inadequate sharps protection, and reuse of products
designed for single use.1 US-based volunteer
organizations that send medical volunteers to developing countries are not
required to comply with the safety and health regulations formulated by the
Occupational Health and Safety Administration(OSHA) (J. Howard, California
Division of Occupational Safety and Health, written communication, March 6,
2002). We surveyed US volunteer health care organizations that provide medical
care in developing countries with higher than average worldwide prevalence
of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to assess their BBP practices and policies.
Methods
We surveyed 124 US-based nongovernmental volunteer health care organizations
listed by the International Medical Volunteer Association that provide direct
medical care in countries with a prevalence of HIV infection greater than
1%.2 Responses were obtained from individuals
within each organization who stated they were knowledgeable or responsible
for their organization's BBP practices and policies. The survey contained
4 demographic questions about organizational structure, and 5 questions relating
to policies for prevention of potential exposure to BBP.
Results
Of the 90 (73%) organizations that responded, 72 stated they send volunteers
with risk of BBP exposure to countries with HIV prevalence greater than 1%
(median number of exposed workers, 17; range, 1-1000). Only 25 (35%) of the
72 organizations had a formal policy for protection of workers from exposure
to blood and body fluids and one fourth required proof of hepatitis B immunization
from volunteers. Thirty (43%) organizations had no formal policies or procedures
to protect volunteers from BBP exposure. Organizations with formal BBP policies
were more likely to have reported volunteer percutaneous injuries in the past
(7/24 with formal policy vs 4/46 with no policy). Large organizations (more
than 100 potentially exposed volunteers annually) were more likely to have
a formal BBP policy than smaller organizations (8/13 larger organizations
vs 14/43 smaller organizations).
Comment
The majority of US organizations sending volunteer health care workers
to countries with high endemic rates of HIV do not have formal policies or
procedures for volunteer protection. There may be significant underreporting
of percutaneous injuries within these organizations, since only 11 of 72 reported
previous percutaneous injuries.
We suggest that volunteer organizations examine their occupational safety
policies, and that all should establish policies and recommended practices
to protect volunteers from BBP exposure. An appropriate and cost-effective
starting point for health behavior education in these organizations could
be the provision of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Universal
Precautions guideline,3 the revised OSHA
standard on needlestick and other sharps injuries to all volunteers,4 as well as hepatitis B immunization.
Alice Edler, MD
Department of Anesthesiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, Calif
Margaret A. Olsen, PhD, MPH
Division of Infectious Diseases Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Mo
M. C. E. Mbwille, ADAS
Mbeya Consultant Hospital Mbeya, Tanzania
1. Sagoe-Moses C, Pearson RD, Perry J, Jagger J. Risks to health care workers in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:538-540.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. International Medical Volunteers Association. Available at: http://www.imva.org. Accessibility verified April 18, 2002.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human
immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens
in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1988;37:377-388.
PUBMED
4. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; Needlestick and other
sharps injuries; Final Rule, 66 Federal Register. 5317 (2001) (codified at 29 CFR 1910). Available at: http://www.osha-slc.gov/FedReg_osha_data/FED20010118A.html. Accessibility verified April 18, 2002.
Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie,
MD, PhD, Senior Editor.
JAMA. 2002;288:166.
|