 |
|
Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
Call for Research
Drummond Rennie, MD;
Annette Flanagin, RN, MA;
Richard Smith, MB, ChB, FRCP;
Jane Smith, MSc
JAMA. 2003;289:1438.
We have now held 4 Peer Review Congresses at 4-year intervals, and their success is demonstrated by the stimulus they have given to an evolving science—investigation of the process whereby scientific work is selected and published.1-4 Since the announcement of the first Peer Review Congress in 1986, the numbers of abstracts submitted to successive Congresses have increased from 50 to 110, 160, and 180, respectively. We have noted similar increases in the number of MEDLINE citations on peer review.5
We now announce that the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication will be held in September 2005, in Chicago, Ill, where the first 2 Congresses were held in 1989 and 1993. This Congress, organized by JAMA and the BMJ Publishing Group, will feature 3 days of presentations of original research. As before, we urge scientists, editors, publishers, and readers who are interested in the processes by which science is published to get going on their research.
Topics of interest include those listed in the Box. Abstracts on any aspect of editorial peer review and its role in scientific publication and information exchange will be considered. Abstracts that summarize new research and findings will be given priority. Deadline for submission of abstracts is January 15, 2005. Instructions for preparing and submitting abstracts are available on the Peer Review Congress Web site at http://www.jama-peer.org or by contacting Jennifer Reiling, JAMA, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 USA; telephone: 312-464-5108; fax: 312-464-5824; e-mail: jennifer_reiling{at}ama-assn.org.
| Box. Topics of Interest for the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
Mechanisms of peer review and editorial decision making
Evaluations of the quality, validity, and practicality of peer review and editorial decision making
Online and Web-based peer review and publication
Prepublication posting and release of information
Quality assurance for reviewers and editors
Authorship, contributorship, and responsibility for published material
Breakdowns, weaknesses, and biases
Conflicts of interest
Scientific misconduct
Peer review of grant proposals
Economics of peer review and scientific publication
Evaluations of the quality of print and online information
Methods for improving the quality, efficiency, and equitable distribution of biomedical information
Interactive digital systems and other new technologies that affect the dissemination of biomedical information
The future of scientific publication
RETURN TO TEXT |
|
As with the previous Congresses, our aim is to improve the quality and credibility of biomedical information and to help advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and equitability of information dissemination throughout the world.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author: Annette Flanagin, JAMA, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (annette_flanagin{at}ama-assn.org).
Editorials represent the opinions of the authors and THE JOURNAL and not those of the American Medical Association.
Funding/Support: Sponsorship for the Peer Review Congress is listed online at: http://www.jama-peer.org.
Author Affiliations: Dr Rennie is deputy editor and Ms Flanagin is managing senior editor, JAMA. Dr Smith is editor and Ms Smith is deputy editor, BMJ.
REFERENCES
1. Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review: selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 1990;263(theme issue):1317-1441.
2. Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 1994;272:91.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Third International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 1998;280(theme issue):203-306. Available online at: http://www.jama-peer.org.
4. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 2002;287(theme issue):2759-2871. Available online at: http://www.jama-peer.org.
5. Rennie D. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA. 2002;287:2759-2760. Available online at: http://www.jama-peer.org.
FREE FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings
Pignatelli et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:578-581.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Peer Review: Integral to Science and Indispensable to Annals
Laine et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:1038-1040.
FULL TEXT
|
