You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 1, July 2, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
 This Article
 •Extract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •World Health
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Viral Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Update: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome— United States, June 11, 2003

JAMA. 2003;290:34.

MMWR. 2003;52:550

CDC continues to work with state and local health departments, the World Health Organization (WHO), and other partners to investigate cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). This report updates SARS cases reported worldwide and in the United States, and describes the eighth probable U.S. SARS case with laboratory evidence of SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection.

During November 1, 2002–June 11, 2003, a total of 8,435 probable SARS cases were reported to WHO from 29 countries, including 70 from the United States; 789 deaths (case-fatality proportion: 9.4%) have been reported, with no SARS-related deaths reported from the United States.1 In the United States, a total of 393 SARS cases have been reported from 42 states and Puerto Rico, with 323 (82%) cases classified as suspect SARS and 70 (18%) classified as probable SARS (i.e., more severe illnesses characterized by the presence of pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome).2 Of the 70 probable patients, 68 (97%) had traveled to areas with documented or suspected community transmission of SARS within the 10 days before illness onset; the remaining two (3%) patients were a health-care worker who provided care to a SARS patient and a household contact of a SARS patient (3). Of the 68 probable SARS cases attributed to travel, 35 (51%) patients reported travel to mainland China; 17 (25%) to Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; five (7%) to Singapore; one (1%) to Hanoi, Vietnam; 14 (21%) to Toronto, Canada; and five (7%) to Taiwan; of these, seven (10%) reported travel to more than one of these areas.

Serologic testing for antibody to SARS-CoV has been completed for 134 suspect and 41 probable cases. None of the suspect cases and eight (20%) of the probable cases have demonstrated antibodies to SARS-CoV, seven of which have been described previously (3). The eighth serologically confirmed probable SARS case occurred in a North Carolina resident who traveled to Toronto, Canada, on May 15 and visited a relative in a health-care facility on May 16 and 17. The relative's hospital roommate and another visitor in the room during these visits both subsequently had SARS diagnosed. The patient returned to the United States on May 18, and had a fever on May 24, followed by respiratory symptoms. He was treated as an outpatient for these symptoms beginning on May 27, and a chest radiograph on June 3 documented pneumonia. The patient has remained in isolation at home. All of the exposed health-care workers and family contacts are under active surveillance for SARS.

Serologic testing on this patient was negative for antibody to SARS-CoV at day 10 of illness and positive at day 11. SARS-CoV RNA was not detected by RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs collected from the patients 11 days after onset of symptoms.


Reported by:

State and local health departments. SARS Investigative Team, CDC.

REFERENCES: 3 available



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Evaluation of the Additive Effect of Natural Herbal Medicine on SARS or SARS-like Infectious Diseases in 2003: a Randomized, Double-blind, and Controlled Pilot Study
Hsu et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2007;0:nem035v1-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.