You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 24, June 23/30, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Health-Related Searches on the Internet

To the Editor: There is ongoing uncertainty about how often consumers use the Internet to search for health-related information. For instance, although a 2000 survey found that 55% of individuals with Internet access have used the Web to find health or medical information,1 Phillipov and Phillips2 reported that 17 health-related search terms they found in the first 300 search terms of the Wordtracker Top 500 keyword report comprised fewer than 1% of all queries. It is possible, however, that people may use many different health-related keywords that are so rare that they never appear on the Top 500 Keywords list. To address this, we analyzed a random sample of search terms entered into a search engine over a longer period of time.

Methods

We used the Metaspy Exposed Web site (http://www.metaspy.com/), which lists 10 unfiltered search strings people are currently entering on Metacrawler, and which refreshes every 15 seconds with new terms. We developed a computer program that visited this page every 30 minutes between February 2001 and April 2002, extracted the search terms, and added them to a database. From a sample of 298 512 query strings in the database, a computer program randomly selected 2985 (1%) search queries that were independently classified by 2 physicians as either "non–health-related" or "health-related." Discordant ratings were resolved by discussion.


Results

Of the 2985 search expressions, 2827 (94.7%) were concordantly classified as non–health-related, 108 (3.6%) were coded by both raters as health-related, and 50 (1.7%) received a discordant classification ({kappa} = 0.80 for interobserver variability, indicating substantial agreement). Thus, our estimate of health-related search terms as a proportion of all search queries conducted is in the range of 3.6% to 5.3%. Examples of search expressions that were coded discordantly included "stop thumb sucking" and "calcium crystals." After discussion, 135 (4.5%) of all search terms were classified as health-related.3 We also coded health-related search queries by broad categories (partly corresponding to clinical specialties) and found that the searches for which people entered the name of a medical organization or looked for specific health care services, as well as searches for medicines and diet, were the most frequent queries (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table. Non–Health-Related Queries and Health-Related Queries, by Category



Comment

Our data suggest that health information is not among the most commonly sought topics on the Internet. Nonetheless, given the millions of searches performed each day, neither could they be described as uncommon. Studies suggest that more than 95% of consumers use a search engine rather than going directly to a Web site when confronted with specific health-related questions.4-5 While our data were harvested from a single search engine, we doubt that the pattern of searches in other search engines would be different.

Acknowledgment: Jim Lai programmed the scripts and David Mason provided technical input.

Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH
geysenba{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca
Centre for Global eHealth Innovation
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario

Christian Köhler, MD
Department of Clinical Social Medicine
University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany

1. Pew Internet and American Life Project. The Online Health Care Revolution: How the Web Helps Americans Take Better Care of Themselves. November 26, 2000. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org.
2. Phillipov G, Phillips PJ. Frequency of health-related search terms on the Internet. JAMA. 2003;290:2258-2259. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003:225-229. PUBMED
4. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World-Wide-Web? qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324:573-577. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Hansen D, Derry H, Resnick P, Richardson C. Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e25. PUBMED

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2004;291:2946.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Seeking Health Information Online: Does Wikipedia Matter?
Laurent and Vickers
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16:471-479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Free Internal Medicine Case-Based Education Through the World Wide Web: How, Where, and With What?
Pappas and Falagas
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:203-207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Suitability of written supplemental materials available on the Internet for nonprescription medications
Wallace et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:71-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.