This Article  • PDF of this Correction  • Original article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAMA. 2004;291:824.

Incorrect Data in Table: In the Original Contribution entitled "Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom" published in the October 22/29, 2003, issue of THE JOURNAL (2003;290:2129-2137), there were incorrect data in Table 5 due to rounding errors. On page 2134, for cancer detected for women aged 50 to 59 years, the rate per 1000 women of 24.5 should have been 24.8 for BCSC and 19.4 should have been 19.2 for NHSBSP, and for cancer detected in women aged 60 to 69 years, the rate per 1000 women of 31.5 should have been 31.6 for BCSC and 26.6 should have been 27.2 for NBCCEDP.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Organized Breast Screening Programs in Canada: Effect of Radiologist Reading Volumes on Outcomes
Coldman et al.
Radiology 2006;238:809-815.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT