You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 23, June 21, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  This Week in JAMA
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

This Week in JAMA

JAMA. 2006;295:2693.

JAMA-EXPRESS
Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene for Breast Cancer Prophylaxis

Two articles in this issue of JAMA report results of the National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial, in which 19 747 postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen (20 mg/d) or raloxifene (60 mg/d) for a maximum of 5 years. In the first article, Vogel and colleagues (SEE ARTICLE) report the trial results for major clinical outcomes. The authors found raloxifene was as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer, but women taking raloxifene had anonsignificant increased risk of noninvasive breast cancer. Raloxifene use was associated with fewer thromboembolic events and cataracts and had comparable rates of other cancers, fractures, ischemic heart disease, and stroke compared with tamoxifen. In the second article, Land and colleagues (SEE ARTICLE) report the trial findings on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. Specifically, self-reported physical and mental health declined modestly during the trial, but there were no differences between the tamoxifen and raloxifene groups. Women taking tamoxifen reported better sexual function, but more gynecological problems, vasomotor symptoms, leg cramps, and bladder control problems, whereas women taking raloxifene reported more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain. In an editorial, Gradishar and Cella (SEE ARTICLE) discuss the results of the STAR trial and their implications for women at high risk of breast cancer.


Figure 60019


Statin Use and Risk of Nuclear Cataract

Statins have antioxidant activity, and oxidative stress has been postulated as a risk factor for age-related cataract. Klein and colleagues investigated the relationship of statins to incident cataracts in an observational, population-based study. At the 5-year follow-up, the authors found a reduced incidence of nuclear cataracts in statin users compared with nonusers. The incidence of cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts did not differ in statin users vs nonusers.

(SEE ARTICLE)


Prescribing Patterns of Clinical Trial Investigators

Whether primary care physician participation in pharmaceutical company–sponsored clinical trials influences treatment patterns or drug preferences is not known. Andersen and colleagues (SEE ARTICLE) report results of an observational study that compared physician practices conducting a pharmaceutical company–sponsored trial on asthma medicine with physician practices not involved in the trial (controls) and assessed the physicians' adherence to international asthma treatment recommendations and choice of asthma medications. The authors found comparable adherence to asthma treatment guidelines in trial-conducting and control practices. However, physician practices conducting the trial were more likely to use the company's drugs than control practices. In an editorial, Psaty and Rennie (SEE ARTICLE) discuss company-sponsored trials, commercial interests, and research integrity.


CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Prophylaxis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Clinical Review

Contrast-induced nephropathy accounts for 12% of cases of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. In a systematic review of the literature, Pannu and colleagues describe risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy, provide evidence-based recommendations for patient management, and define priorities for future research.

(SEE ARTICLE)


A Piece of My Mind

"As time has passed since [Ashley’s] death, and I have studied medical ethics and end-of-life issues, it has become clearer to me that there is a gap in the scope of medical care for terminally ill persons." From "At Face Value."

(SEE ARTICLE)


Medical News & Perspectives

According to the US government’s plan for federal involvement in an influenza pandemic, much of the burden will fall on state and local governments and health care workers.

(SEE ARTICLE)


The Quality and IT Revolutions

Recent emphases on quality measurement and information technology (IT) are associated with both expected and unexpected consequences.

(SEE ARTICLE)


Audio Commentary

Dr DeAngelis summarizes and comments on this week's issue. Go to http://jama.ama-assn.org/misc/audiocommentary.dtl.


JAMA Patient Page

For your patients: Information about randomized controlled trials.

(SEE ARTICLE)



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.