This Article  • PDF of this Correction  • Original article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAMA. 2003;289:3242.

Incorrect Footnote Symbols: In the Scientific Review and Clinical Applications article entitled "Interventions to Enhance Patient Adherence to Medication Prescriptions: Scientific Review" published in the December 11, 2002, issue of THE JOURNAL (2002;288:2868-2879), 3 tables contained footnote symbol errors. On page 2871, in Table 2 , the asterisk (*) following "Adherence Outcome" should be deleted. There should be an asterisk (*) following "Urine measurements" in the "Adherence Outcome" column. On page 2873, in Table 3 in the "Adherence Outcome" column for the human immunodeficiency virus disorder, the section mark () following "Structured interview with pill count" should be a parallel mark (||). On page 2874, in Table 4 , the dagger () footnote should read "P≤.05" and the double dagger () footnote should read "Not significant at P = .05 level." Also, in the second row in the "Clinical Outcome" column, the dagger () following "Social dysfunction" should be a section mark ().

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Phytoestrogens and breast cancer -promoters or protectors?
Rice and Whitehead
Endocr Relat Cancer 2006;13:995-1015.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT