You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 8, August 23/30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Correction
 This Article
 •PDF of this Correction
 •Original article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Eating Disorders
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fluoxetine After Weight Restoration in Anorexia Nervosa—Correction

JAMA. 2006;296:934.

Incorrect Data: In the Original Contribution entitled "Fluoxetine After Weight Restoration in Anorexia Nervosa" published in the June 14, 2006, issue of JAMA (2006;295:2605-2612), the boxes in Figure 1 that stated the reasons for premature termination for participants taking fluoxetine and placebo were switched. In the box describing reasons for termination for participants taking the placebo, "Suicide Attempt" was incorrectly substituted for "Clinical Deterioration." In Tables 1, 3, and the Measures section, The Yale Brown Cornell Obsessive Compulsive Scale for Eating Disorders should have been termed the Yale-Brown-Cornell Eating Disorder Scale and the Eating Disorders Inventory should have been termed the Eating Disorder Inventory. In the Table 2 footnotes, the {chi}2 value after "§Proportion of patients with outcome status of full recovery, good, or fair vs poor with fluoxetine vs placebo" should have been {chi}2 = 1.005. In Table 3, the random-effects regression for the fluoxetine group for the Eating Disorder Inventory bulimia subscale should have been 0.11 rather than –0.11. In the last paragraph of the article, the references 24,25 after "psychological treatments" should have been numbered 24 and references 26,27 after "olanzapine" should have been numbered 26. None of these corrections affect the conclusions in the article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.