You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 18, May 9, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Board of Trustees Report
 This Article
 •Excerpt
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Frozen Pre-embryos

JAMA. 1990;263(18):2484-2487.


References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.


1. Seibel MM. A new era in reproductive technology: in vitro fertilization, gamete intrafallopian transfer and donated gametes and embryos. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:828-834.
2. Trounson A. Preservation of human eggs and embryos. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1-12.
3. Trounson A, Freemann L. Role of cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos in an IVF program. In: Behrman SJ, Kistner RW, Patton GW, eds. Progress in Infertility. 3rd ed. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co Inc; 1988:621-629.
4. Trounson A, Freemann L. The use of embryo cryopreservation in human IVF programmes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985;12:825-833.
5. Wood C, Trounson A. Current state and future of IVF. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985;12:753-766.
6. Skinner v Oklahoma, 316 US 635 (1942).
7. Griswold v Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965).
8. Webster v Reproductive Health Services, 109 S Ct 3040 (1989).
9. Parham v JR, 442 US 584 (1979).
10. Bowen v American Hospital Association, 476 US 610 (1986).
11. Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in cryopreservation of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:371-381.
12. Ill Ann Stat ch 1101/2, ¶ 11-7.
13. Ill Ann Stat ch 1101/2, ¶ 11-5(b).
14. McGuire M, Alexander NJ. Artificial insemination of single women. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:182-184.
15. Orentlicher D. Does mother know best? Hastings L J. 1989;40:1111-1122.
16. Meyer v Nebraska, 262 US 390 (1923).
17. Prince v Massachusetts, 321 US 158 (1944).
18. Carey v Population Services International, 431 US 678 (1977).
19. Current Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association—1989: In Vitro Fertilization. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1989.
20. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v Danforth, 428 US 52 (1976).
21. In re Baby M, 109 NJ 396, 537 A2d 1227 (1988).
22. Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethical Issues in Human in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Placement. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1986.
23. Robertson JA. Resolving disputes over frozen embryos. Hastings Cent Rep. November/December 1989;19(6):7-12.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.