 |
 |

Safety of Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Henry Thomas Stelfox, MD;
David W. Bates, MD, MSc;
Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, MSc
JAMA. 2003;290:1899-1905.
Context Hospital infection control policies that use patient isolation prevent nosocomial transmission of infectious diseases, but may inadvertently lead to patient neglect and errors.
Objective To examine the quality of medical care received by patients isolated for infection control.
Design, Setting, and Patients We identified consecutive adults who were isolated for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection at 2 large North American teaching hospitals: a general cohort (patients admitted with all diagnoses between January 1, 1999, and January 1, 2000; n = 78); and a disease-specific cohort (patients admitted with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure between January 1, 1999, and July 1, 2002; n = 72). Two matched controls were selected for each isolated patient (n = 156 general cohort controls and n = 144 disease-specific cohort controls).
Main Outcome Measures Quality-of-care measures encompassing processes, outcomes, and satisfaction. Adjustments for study cohort and patient demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics were conducted using multivariable regression.
Results Isolated and control patients generally had similar baseline characteristics; however, isolated patients were twice as likely as control patients to experience adverse events during their hospitalization (31 vs 15 adverse events per 1000 days; P<.001). This difference in adverse events reflected preventable events (20 vs 3 adverse events per 1000 days; P<.001) as opposed to nonpreventable events (11 vs 12 adverse events per 1000 days; P = .98). Isolated patients were also more likely to formally complain to the hospital about their care than control patients (8% vs 1%; P<.001), to have their vital signs not recorded as ordered (51% vs 31%; P<.001), and more likely to have days with no physician progress note (26% vs 13%; P<.001). No differences in hospital mortality were observed for the 2 groups (17% vs 10%; P = .16).
Conclusion Compared with controls, patients isolated for infection control precautions experience more preventable adverse events, express greater dissatisfaction with their treatment, and have less documented care.
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine (Drs Stelfox and Redelmeier) and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Dr Redelmeier), University of Toronto, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre (Dr Redelmeier), Toronto, Ontario; Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Stelfox); and Division of General Medicine and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Drs Stelfox and Bates), and Partners HealthCare Systems (Dr Bates), Boston, Mass.
RELATED LETTERS
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2004;291(4):420.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Nasia Safdar and Dennis G. Maki
JAMA. 2004;291(4):420-421.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Stephen G. Weber, Trish M. Perl, and Sara E. Cosgrove
JAMA. 2004;291(4):421.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection ControlReply
Henry Thomas Stelfox, David W. Bates, and Donald A. Redelmeier
JAMA. 2004;291(4):421-422.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Single-Patient Rooms for Safe Patient-Centered Hospitals
Detsky and Etchells
JAMA 2008;300:954-956.
FULL TEXT
Care of Children Isolated for Infection Control: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Cohen et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e411-e415.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rapid Identification of Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for MRSA Carriage
Evans et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:506-512.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Benefits and Drawbacks of Universal Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Diekema
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:67-67.
FULL TEXT
Benefits and Drawbacks of Universal Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Peterson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:68-69.
FULL TEXT
Ethical Implications of Active Surveillance Cultures and Contact Precautions for Controlling Multidrug Resistant Organisms in the Hospital Setting
Edmond et al.
Public Health Ethics 2008;0:phn014v1-phn014.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Preventing MRSA Infections: Finding It Is Not Enough
Diekema and Climo
JAMA 2008;299:1190-1192.
FULL TEXT
Use of a Regional Health Information Exchange to Detect Crossover of Patients with MRSA between Urban Hospitals
Kho et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2008;15:212-216.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It
Auerbach et al.
NEJM 2007;357:608-613.
FULL TEXT
Differences in HIV Care Between Patients With and Without Severe Mental Illness
Fremont et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:681-688.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Microbial Colonization of the Hands of Residents
Baker and Katz
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:341-345.
ABSTRACT
Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing
Bootsma et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:5620-5625.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Let MRSA-positive patients live a normal life
Geffers and Ruden
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:835-836.
FULL TEXT
Advantages and Disadvantages of Single-Versus Multiple-Occupancy Rooms in Acute Care Environments: A Review and Analysis of the Literature
Chaudhury et al.
Environment and Behavior 2005;37:760-786.
ABSTRACT
Enhanced Notification of Critical Ventilator Events
Evans et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:589-595.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Number of Negative Acid-Fast Smears Needed To Adequately Assess Infectivity of Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Mixides et al.
Chest 2005;128:108-115.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Does isolation prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
Dhaliwal and McGeer
CMAJ 2005;172:875-875.
FULL TEXT
Medical Errors
Holder
ASH Education Book 2005;2005:503-506.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rapid Detection of Antimicrobial-Resistant Organism Carriage: an Unmet Clinical Need
Diekema et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:2879-2883.
FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Parienti
JAMA 2004;291:420-420.
FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Weber et al.
JAMA 2004;291:421-421.
FULL TEXT
Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
Safdar and Maki
JAMA 2004;291:420-421.
FULL TEXT
Isolation Practices Decrease Patients' Safety
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2003;2003:4-4.
FULL TEXT
|