You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 14, October 13, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Neurology
 •Neuromuscular diseases
 •Immunization
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Vaccine Policy Changes and Epidemiology of Poliomyelitis in the United States

Lorraine Niño Alexander, RN, MPH; Jane F. Seward, MBBS, MPH; Tammy A. Santibanez, PhD; Mark A. Pallansch, PhD; Olen M. Kew, PhD; D. Rebecca Prevots, PhD; Peter M. Strebel, MD; Joanne Cono, MD, ScM; Melinda Wharton, MD; Walter A. Orenstein, MD; Roland W. Sutter, MD

JAMA. 2004;292:1696-1701.

Context  The last case of poliomyelitis in the United States due to indigenously acquired wild poliovirus occurred in 1979; however, as a consequence of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) use that began in 1961, an average of 9 cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) were confirmed each year from 1961 through 1989. To reduce the VAPP burden, national vaccination policy changed in 1997 from reliance on OPV to options for a sequential schedule of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) followed by OPV. In 2000, an exclusive IPV schedule was adopted.

Objective  To review the epidemiology of paralytic poliomyelitis and document the association between the vaccine schedule changes and VAPP in the United States.

Design and Setting  Review of national surveillance data from 1990 through 2003 for cases of confirmed paralytic poliomyelitis.

Main Outcome Measures  Number of confirmed paralytic poliomyelitis cases, including VAPP, and ratio of VAPP cases to number of doses of OPV distributed that occurred before, during, and after implementation of policy changes.

Results  From 1990 through 1999, 61 cases of paralytic poliomyelitis were reported; 59 (97%) of these were VAPP (1 case per 2.9 million OPV doses distributed), 1 case was imported, and 1 case was indeterminate. Thirteen cases occurred during the 1997-1999 transitional policy period and were associated with the all-OPV schedule; none occurred with the IPV-OPV schedule. No cases occurred after the United States implemented the all-IPV policy in 2000. The last imported poliomyelitis case occurred in 1993 and the last case of VAPP occurred in 1999.

Conclusion  The change in polio vaccination policy from OPV to exclusive use of IPV was successfully implemented; this change led to the elimination of VAPP in the United States.


Author Affiliations: National Immunization Program (Ms Alexander and Drs Seward, Santibanez, Prevots, Strebel, Cono, Wharton, Orenstein, and Sutter) and National Center for Infectious Diseases (Drs Pallansch and Kew), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Dr Prevots is now with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Bethesda, Md. Dr Orenstein is now with the Emory University Vaccine Research Center, Atlanta, Ga.

Corresponding Author: Lorraine N. Alexander, RN, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E-61, Atlanta, GA 30333 (lalexander{at}cdc.gov).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Poliomyelitis in the United States: The Final Chapter?
John F. Modlin
JAMA. 2004;292(14):1749-1751.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polio
Sharon Parmet, Tiffany J. Glass, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2004;292(14):1780.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Changes in Population Dynamics during Long-Term Evolution of Sabin Type 1 Poliovirus in an Immunodeficient Patient
Odoom et al.
J. Virol. 2008;82:9179-9190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Isolation of Sabin-Like Polioviruses from Wastewater in a Country Using Inactivated Polio Vaccine
Zurbriggen et al.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:5608-5614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Historical Comparisons of Morbidity and Mortality for Vaccine-Preventable Diseases in the United States
Roush et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2155-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Analysis in Planning for a Polio Outbreak in the United States
Jenkins and Modlin
Pediatrics 2006;118:611-618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intratypic Recombination among Lineages of Type 1 Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Emerging during Chronic Infection of an Immunodeficient Patient
Yang et al.
J. Virol. 2005;79:12623-12634.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Poliomyelitis and the postpolio syndrome
Howard
BMJ 2005;330:1314-1318.
FULL TEXT  

The Elimination of Vaccine-Associated Polio in the US
Dubik and Barton
AAP Grand Rounds 2005;13:9-10.
FULL TEXT  

Ensuring Preparedness for Potential Poliomyelitis Outbreaks: Recommendations for the US Poliovirus Vaccine Stockpile From the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
NVAC-ACIP Joint Working Group and Centers for Dise
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:1106-1112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Poliomyelitis in the United States: The Final Chapter?
Modlin
JAMA 2004;292:1749-1751.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.