 |
|
Accumulated Lead Exposure and Risk of Age-Related Cataract in Men
Debra A. Schaumberg, ScD, MPH;
Flavia Mendes, MD;
Mini Balaram, MD;
M. Reza Dana, MD, MPH;
David Sparrow, DSc;
Howard Hu, MD, MPH, ScD
JAMA. 2004;292:2750-2754.
Context Low-level lead exposure may increase the risk for a number of chronic age-related diseases. Several studies have documented the presence of lead in lenses with cataract. The intrusion of lead into the lens may alter lens redox status and cause protein conformational changes that decrease lens transparency.
Objective To determine the relationship of cumulative lead exposure with the development of cataract.
Design, Setting, and Participants Tibial (cortical) and patellar (trabecular) bone lead levels were measured by K x-ray fluorescence between 1991 and 1999 in a subset of participants in the Normative Aging Study (NAS), a Boston-based longitudinal study of aging in men. Among the first 795 NAS participants to have bone lead levels measured, we reviewed eye examination data (collected routinely every 3-5 years) for the period after the bone lead measurements were taken. We limited the population to men aged 60 years and older who had sufficient eye examination information available (n = 642). Blood lead levels were also measured.
Main Outcome Measures Cataract assessment was done while masked to the lead level results. A participant was considered to have cataract if there was documentation for either eye of cataract surgery or a cataract graded clinically as 3+ or higher on a 4-point scale. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as estimates of the magnitude and significance of the relationship of lead exposure with cataract, in logistic regression models.
Results The mean age of the study participants was 69 years and cataract was identified in 122 men. The age-adjusted OR (95% CI) for cataract for men in the highest vs lowest quintile of tibia lead level was 2.68 (1.31-5.50). Further adjustment for pack-years of cigarette smoking, diabetes, blood lead levels, and intake of vitamin C, vitamin E, and carotenoids resulted in an OR of 3.19 (95% CI, 1.48-6.90). For patella lead level, there was an increased risk of cataract in the highest vs lowest quintile (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.88-4.02), but the trend was not significant (P = .16). Blood lead levels, more indicative of short-term exposure levels, were not significantly associated with cataract (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.46-1.72; P = .73).
Conclusions These epidemiological data suggest that accumulated lead exposure, such as that commonly experienced by adults in the United States, may be an important unrecognized risk factor for cataract. This research suggests that reduction of lead exposure could help decrease the global burden of cataract.
Author Affiliations: Division of Preventive Medicine (Dr Schaumberg), Channing Laboratory (Dr Hu), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (Drs Schaumberg, Mendes, Balaram, and Dana), Department of Epidemiology (Dr Schaumberg), Department of Environmental Health (Dr Hu), Harvard School of Public Health, The Normative Aging Study, Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr Sparrow), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
RELATED LETTERS
Lead Exposure and Cataract Risk in Men
David C. Beebe
JAMA. 2005;293(14):1724.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lead Exposure and Cataract Risk in Men
Brian J. Song
JAMA. 2005;293(14):1724.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lead Exposure and Cataract Risk in Men—Reply
Debra A. Schaumberg and Howard Hu
JAMA. 2005;293(14):1724-1725.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Vincent van Gogh (1853-90): the plumbic artist
Weissman
J Med Biogr 2008;16:109-117.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Green cataract.
Drews
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:579-586.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention: Too Little, Too Late
Lanphear
JAMA 2005;293:2274-2276.
FULL TEXT
Lead Exposure and Cataract Risk in Men
Beebe
JAMA 2005;293:1724-1724.
FULL TEXT
Lead Exposure and Cataract Risk in Men
Song
JAMA 2005;293:1724-1724.
FULL TEXT
|
