You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 11, September 21, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Physician-Scientist Career Pipeline in 2005

Build It, and They Will Come

Timothy J. Ley, MD; Leon E. Rosenberg, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:1343-1351.

Context  Physician-scientists play a unique and critical role in medical research. Nonetheless, a number of trends followed during the 1980s and 1990s revealed that this career pathway was in serious jeopardy. Physician-scientists were declining in number and were getting older. A variety of factors were thought to contribute to this problem, including increasing indebtedness of medical school graduates caused by rapidly rising medical school tuition costs.

Objective  To evaluate the impact of recently initiated programs from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and several not-for-profit institutions designed to revitalize the physician-scientist career pipeline.

Design  We assessed recent trends in the physician-scientist career pipeline using data obtained from the NIH, the American Medical Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and other sources.

Main Outcome Measures  Total numbers of physicians performing research, grant application numbers and success rates for MDs, MD-PhDs, and PhDs at various stages in their careers, interest in research among medical students, medical school tuitions and postgraduate salaries, numbers and composition of applicants for NIH loan repayment programs, and gender distribution of young physician-scientists.

Results  The number of physician-scientists in the United States has been in a steady state for the past decade, but funded physician-scientists are significantly older than they were 2 decades ago. However, the study of early career markers over the past 7 to 10 years has demonstrated increasing interest in research careers by medical students, steady growth of the MD-PhD pool, and a new burst of activity in the "late bloomer" pool of MDs (individuals who choose research careers in medical school or in residency training), fueled by loan repayment programs that were created by the NIH in 2002. Several recent trends for more established physician-scientists have also suggested improvement.

Conclusions  Although it is too early to assess the impact of these indicators on the long-term career pathway, the recent growth in activity in the physician-scientist career pipeline is an encouraging development. Continued funding of these new programs, coupled with sustained support for physician-scientists committed to the pathway, will be required to maintain these positive trends.


Author Affiliations: Section of Stem Cell Biology, Division of Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Genetics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Dr Ley); Department of Molecular Biology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (Dr Rosenberg).


RELATED LETTERS

Physician-Scientist Training
Richard L. Haspel and Jason R. Orlinick
JAMA. 2006;295(6):623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Scientist Training—Reply
Timothy J. Ley and Leon Rosenberg
JAMA. 2006;295(6):623-624.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research.
Ratcliffe et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008;136:392-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Future of the Orthopaedic Clinician-Scientist. Part I: The Potential Role of MD-PhD Students Considering Orthopaedic Surgery
Ahn et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1794-1799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The clinician-scientist: a rare breed under threat in a hostile environment
Lemoine
DMM 2008;1:12-14.
FULL TEXT  

Volume 100: clinical investigations: where next?
Colvin and Moller
Br J Anaesth 2008;100:433-435.
FULL TEXT  

Combined Radiology Residency/PhD Program for Education of Academic Radiologists: A Response to Revitalizing the Radiology Research Enterprise
Rahal et al.
Radiology 2007;245:14-20.
FULL TEXT  

New Physician-Investigators Receiving National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants: A Historical Perspective on the "Endangered Species"
Dickler et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2496-2501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

JASN Moves On
Couser et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;18:1648-1651.
FULL TEXT  

Alterations in processes and priorities needed for new drug development.
Fisher Wilson
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:793-796.
FULL TEXT  

Interests in Research Electives Among Osteopathic Medical Students
Pheley et al.
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2006;106:667-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Scientist Training
Haspel and Orlinick
JAMA 2006;295:623-623.
FULL TEXT  

Reforming research in the NHS
Sheridan
BMJ 2005;331:1339-1340.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals
Tonks
BMJ 2005;331:721-722.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Research--State of the Science
Fontanarosa et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1424-1425.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.