You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 14, October 12, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (133)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Early Experience With Pay-for-Performance

From Concept to Practice

Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD; Richard G. Frank, PhD; Zhonghe Li, MA; Arnold M. Epstein, MD, MA

JAMA. 2005;294:1788-1793.

Context  The adoption of pay-for-performance mechanisms for quality improvement is growing rapidly. Although there is intense interest in and optimism about pay-for-performance programs, there is little published research on pay-for-performance in health care.

Objective  To evaluate the impact of a prototypical physician pay-for-performance program on quality of care.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We evaluated a natural experiment with pay-for-performance using administrative reports of physician group quality from a large health plan for an intervention group (California physician groups) and a contemporaneous comparison group (Pacific Northwest physician groups). Quality improvement reports were included from October 2001 through April 2004 issued to approximately 300 large physician organizations.

Main Outcome Measures  Three process measures of clinical quality: cervical cancer screening, mammography, and hemoglobin A1c testing.

Results  Improvements in clinical quality scores were as follows: for cervical cancer screening, 5.3% for California vs 1.7% for Pacific Northwest; for mammography, 1.9% vs 0.2%; and for hemoglobin A1c, 2.1% vs 2.1%. Compared with physician groups in the Pacific Northwest, the California network demonstrated greater quality improvement after the pay-for-performance intervention only in cervical cancer screening (a 3.6% difference in improvement [P = .02]). In total, the plan awarded $3.4 million (27% of the amount set aside) in bonus payments between July 2003 and April 2004, the first year of the program. For all 3 measures, physician groups with baseline performance at or above the performance threshold for receipt of a bonus improved the least but garnered the largest share of the bonus payments.

Conclusion  Paying clinicians to reach a common, fixed performance target may produce little gain in quality for the money spent and will largely reward those with higher performance at baseline.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health (Drs Rosenthal and Epstein and Ms Li), Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Dr Epstein), and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School and National Bureau of Economic Research (Dr Frank), Boston, Mass.


RELATED ARTICLE

Pay-for-Performance Research: How to Learn What Clinicians and Policy Makers Need to Know
R. Adams Dudley
JAMA. 2005;294(14):1821-1823.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Public Health Reporting: The United States Perspective
Halpin et al.
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2008;12:191-202.
ABSTRACT  

Variations in Quality of Care for Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
Spencer et al.
JCO 2008;26:3735-3742.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exclusion of Patients from Pay-for-Performance Targets by English Physicians
Doran et al.
NEJM 2008;359:274-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for performance in Australia: Queensland's new Clinical Practice Improvement Payment
Duckett et al.
J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13:174-177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001-2003
Pearson et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1167-1176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond The Efficiency Index: Finding A Better Way To Reduce Overuse And Increase Efficiency In Physician Care
Greene et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w250-w259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
Werner et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Recommended Ambulatory Care Services: Is the Veterans Affairs Quality Gap Narrowing?
Ross et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:950-958.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving prevention in primary care: Evaluating the sustainability of outreach facilitation
Hogg et al.
cfp 2008;54:712-720.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of the Scientific Soundness of Clinical Performance Measures: A Field Test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Colorectal Cancer Screening Measure
Schneider et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:876-882.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Care as If Health Mattered
Frieden and Mostashari
JAMA 2008;299:950-952.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
Fung et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:111-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes Toward Pay-for-Performance Initiatives Among Primary Care Osteopathic Physicians in Small Group Practices
Locke and Srinivasan
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2008;108:21-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-Performance Principles That Promote Patient-Centered Care: An Ethics Manifesto
Snyder et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:792-794.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Designing a Model Health Care System
Volpp
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:2126-2128.
FULL TEXT  

Measuring performance and missing the point?
Heath et al.
BMJ 2007;335:1075-1076.
FULL TEXT  

Correlations among measures of quality in HIV care in the United States: cross sectional study
Wilson et al.
BMJ 2007;335:1085-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lymph Node Counts in Colon Cancer Surgery: Lessons for Users of Quality Indicators
Simunovic and Baxter
JAMA 2007;298:2194-2195.
FULL TEXT  

Is P4P Really FFS?
Wodchis et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1797-1799.
FULL TEXT  

The GAAP in Quality Measurement and Reporting
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1800-1802.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Bypass Surgery
Suaya et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1653-1662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Chien et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:283S-304S.
ABSTRACT  

Performance Measures in Neuroradiology
Seidenwurm et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1435-1438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Missing Link: Improving Quality With a Chronic Disease Management Intervention for the Primary Care Office
Zweifler
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:453-456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rise of Pay for Performance: Implications for Care of People with Chronic Kidney Disease
Desai et al.
CJASN 2007;2:1087-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Patient Care by Linking Evidence-Based Medicine and Evidence-Based Management
Shortell et al.
JAMA 2007;298:673-676.
FULL TEXT  

Estimating costs of quality improvement for outpatient healthcare organisations: a practical methodology
Brown et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:248-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regulation, Financial Incentives, and the Production of Quality
Avery and Schultz
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:265-273.
ABSTRACT  

Pay for Performance Alone Cannot Drive Quality
Mandel and Kotagal
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:650-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-Performance in Pediatrics: Proceed With Caution
Chien and Dudley
Pediatrics 2007;120:186-188.
FULL TEXT  

Cost, Quality, and Value: The Changing Political Economy of Dialysis Care
Himmelfarb et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;18:2021-2027.
FULL TEXT  

Making Pay-For-Performance Work In Medicaid
Felt-Lisk et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w516-w527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Pay-For-Performance In Medicaid Through Real-World Observation
Christianson
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w528-w531.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for performance: learning about quality
Bell and Levinson
CMAJ 2007;176:1717-1719.
FULL TEXT  

A Practical Guide to Assigning Levels of Evidence
Wright
JBJS 2007;89:1128-1130.
FULL TEXT  

Implementing Pay-for-Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Profit et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:975-982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w405-w414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geography Matters: Relationships among Urban Residential Segregation, Dialysis Facilities, and Patient Outcomes
Rodriguez et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:493-501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

General Internists' Views On Pay-For-Performance And Public Reporting Of Quality Scores: A National Survey
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:492-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-Performance: Will the Latest Payment Trend Improve Care?
Rosenthal and Dudley
JAMA 2007;297:740-744.
FULL TEXT  

Current Issues in Health Policy: A Primer for the Orthopaedic Surgeon
Sharan D. et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:76-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Dosing Before Primary Hip and Knee Replacement as a Pay-for-Performance Measure
Bhattacharyya and Hooper
JBJS 2007;89:287-291.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance at the Tipping Point
Epstein
NEJM 2007;356:515-517.
FULL TEXT  

Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;356:486-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rationale for Intervention to Reduce Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A General Internist's Perspective
Greenstone
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE 2007;1:20-23.
ABSTRACT  

Transferring Critically Ill Patients Out of Hospital Improves the Standardized Mortality Ratio: A Simulation Study
Kahn et al.
Chest 2007;131:68-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American College of Cardiology 2006 Principles to Guide Physician Pay-for-Performance Programs: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Work Group on Pay for Performance (A Joint Working Group of the ACC Quality Strategic Direction Committee and the ACC Advocacy Committee)
Brush et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2603-2609.
FULL TEXT  

A Pay-for-Population Health Performance System
Kindig
JAMA 2006;296:2611-2613.
FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care.
Rowe
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:695-699.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-performance programs in the United Kingdom.
Sanderson et al.
NEJM 2006;355:1832-1832.
FULL TEXT  

Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?
Petersen et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:265-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.
Doran et al.
NEJM 2006;355:375-384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paying for performance in the United States and abroad.
Epstein
NEJM 2006;355:406-408.
FULL TEXT  

Employer-sponsored insurance--riding the health care tiger.
Blumenthal
NEJM 2006;355:195-202.
FULL TEXT  

It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs.
Sidorov
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:1079-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reorganizing medicare for older adults with chronic illness.
Daaleman
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:303-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influencing cancer policy.
Herdman et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:800-807.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will physician-level measures of clinical performance be used in medical malpractice litigation?
Kesselheim et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1831-1834.
FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-Performance Initiatives and B. F. Skinner
Bachman
Psychiatr. Serv. 2006;57:273-273.
FULL TEXT  

Rising Rates of Cardiac Procedures in the United States and Canada: Too Much of a Good Thing?
Ayanian
Circulation 2006;113:333-335.
FULL TEXT  

Creating a Safer Health Care System: Finding the Constraint
Pauker et al.
JAMA 2005;294:2906-2908.
FULL TEXT  

Pay-for-Performance Research: How to Learn What Clinicians and Policy Makers Need to Know
Dudley
JAMA 2005;294:1821-1823.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.