You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 9, September 7, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

US Graduate Medical Education, 2004-2005

Trends in Primary Care Specialties

Sarah E. Brotherton, PhD; Paul H. Rockey, MD, MPH; Sylvia I. Etzel

JAMA. 2005;294:1075-1082.

Context  Over the last decade, the primary care specialties have experienced an ebb and flow in popularity. A description of the future primary care workforce may inform planning for the health care needs of our population.

Objectives  To describe characteristics of physicians training in primary care specialties over the past 9 years and to monitor trends in the characteristics of the entire residency population.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Descriptive survey study of the National GME Census, conducted by the American Medical Association and Association of American Medical Colleges, which jointly surveyed 8246 allopathic graduate medical education (GME) programs during the academic year 2004-2005 about active, transferred, and graduated residents, as well as about program characteristics. Program directors confirmed the status of 97.3% of active residents. The accompanying program survey was completed by 7163 (87%) of the program directors.

Main Outcome Measures  General trends in the numbers and characteristics of all residents, fellows, and training programs, with specific trends for residents and fellows training in the primary care specialties and subspecialties over the past 9 years.

Results  The census counted 101 291 physicians-in-training during the 2004-2005 academic year, the largest number ever recorded by this survey. The number of osteopathic medical school graduates (DOs) in allopathic GME decreased from 5838 in 2003-2004 to 5675, following many years of annual increases. The number of residents in primary care specialties reached a peak in the mid 1990s. The number of family medicine residents who are graduates of US allopathic medical schools (USMDs) has fallen from 8232 (77.6%) in 1998-1999 to 4848 (51.7%) in 2004-2005. The number of primary care residents who are graduates of foreign medical schools and US citizens (USIMGs) nearly doubled between 1995-1996 (n = 1768) and 2004-2005 (n = 3304). The number of USIMGs training in internal medicine or pediatrics subspecialties increased by 45.7% between 1995-1996 (n = 622) and 2004-2005 (n = 906). The number of pediatric subspecialty fellows grew 55.7%, mostly because of the near doubling of USMDs, from 813 to 1617. More than half of primary care residents are women (52.5%). All primary care specialties and subspecialties experienced gains in the proportion of female residents, with the greatest in obstetrics/gynecology, which increased by 28.7% (57.9% in 1995-1996 vs 74.5% in 2004-2005).

Conclusions  An increasing proportion of physicians are pursuing subspecialty training, while the number in primary care specialties has leveled off. Trends in GME suggest that the primary care medical workforce of the future will include more women, more IMGs, and more DOs.


Author Affiliations: Division of Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How Do Race And Sex Affect The Earnings Of Primary Care Physicians?
Weeks et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:557-566.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US Residency Training Before and After the 1997 Balanced Budget Act
Salsberg et al.
JAMA 2008;300:1174-1180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Status of Women in Academic Anesthesiology: A Progress Report
Wong and Stock
Anesth. Analg. 2008;107:178-184.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Many Pediatric Residents Seek and Obtain Part-time Positions
Cull et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:276-281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unhealthy Trends: The Future Of Physician Services
Pham and Ginsburg
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1586-1598.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Hospital Mortality Associated with Residency Work-Hour Regulations
Shetty and Bhattacharya
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:73-80.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studies Comparing Quality of Care by Specialty: Valid, Relevant, or Neither?
O'Malley and O'Malley
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:8-9.
FULL TEXT  

The Status of Academic General Pediatrics: No Longer Endangered?
Cheng et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e46-e52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated with Academic Radiology Research Productivity
Itagaki and Pile-Spellman
Radiology 2005;237:774-780.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.