This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (17)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Ophthalmology  • Ophthalmological Disorders  • Ophthalmological Disorders, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Susan Vitale, PhD, MHS; Mary Frances Cotch, PhD; Robert D. Sperduto, MD

JAMA. 2006;295:2158-2163.

Context  The prevalence of visual impairment in the US public has not been surveyed nationally in several decades.

Objective  To estimate the number of US individuals aged 12 years or older who have impaired distance vision due to uncorrected refractive error.

Design, Setting, and Participants  The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), using a multistage probability sampling design, included a vision evaluation in a mobile examination center. Visual acuity data were obtained from 13 265 of 14 203 participants (93.4%) who visited the mobile examination center in 1999-2002. Visual impairment was defined as presenting distance visual acuity of 20/50 or worse in the better-seeing eye. Visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error was defined as (presenting) visual impairment that improved, aided by automated refraction results, to 20/40 or better in the better-seeing eye.

Main Outcome Measures  Presenting distance visual acuity (measured with usual corrective lenses, if any) and distance visual acuity after automated refraction.

Results  Overall, 1190 study participants had visual impairment (weighted prevalence, 6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0%-6.8%), and of these, 83.3% could achieve good visual acuity with correction (95% CI, 80.9%-85.8%). Extrapolating these findings to the general US population, approximately 14 million individuals aged 12 years or older have visual impairment (defined as distance visual acuity of 20/50 or worse), and of these, more than 11 million individuals could have their vision improved to 20/40 or better with refractive correction.

Conclusions  Visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error is a common condition in the United States. Providing appropriate refractive correction to those individuals whose vision can be improved is an important public health endeavor with implications for safety and quality of life.

Author Affiliations: Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of Sensory Function in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
Schumm et al.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2009;64B:i76-i85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Undercorrected Refractive Errors among Singaporean Malay Adults: The Singapore Malay Eye Study
Rosman et al.
IOVS 2009;50:3621-3628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:37-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Older Adults for Impaired Visual Acuity: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Chou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:44-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Caregiver Social Problem-Solving Abilities and Adjustment to Caring for a Relative with Vision Loss
Bambara et al.
IOVS 2009;50:1585-1592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reported Eye Care Utilization and Health Insurance Status Among US Adults
Lee et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:303-310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Knowledge and beliefs associated with refractive errors and undercorrection: the Singapore Malay Eye Study
Rosman et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:4-10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Prevalence and Risk Indicators of Uncorrected Refractive Error and Unmet Refractive Need in Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study
Varma et al.
IOVS 2008;49:5264-5273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Response of Vitreous Hemorrhage after Intravitreous Injection of Highly Purified Ovine Hyaluronidase (Vitrase) in Patients with Diabetes
Bhavsar et al.
IOVS 2008;49:4219-4225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Mellitus and Visual Impairment: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004
Zhang et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1421-1427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain
Rahi et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1190-1194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Causes of Low Vision and Blindness in an Urban Malay Population: The Singapore Malay Eye Study
Wong et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1091-1099.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Refractive Error in the United States, 1999-2004
Vitale et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1111-1119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Insurance Coverage and Use of Eye Care Services
Zhang et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1121-1126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Reported Age-Related Eye Diseases and Visual Impairment in the United States: Results of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey
Ryskulova et al.
AJPH 2008;98:454-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Eye Care in the United States: Do We Deliver to High-Risk People Who Can Benefit Most From It?
Zhang et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:411-418.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correctable Visual Impairment Among Persons With Diabetes--United States, 1999-2004
JAMA 2007;297:34-36.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals.
Tonks and Ravichandran
BMJ 2006;332:1205-1206.
FULL TEXT