You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 17, November 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (167)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Stroke
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function 3 to 9 Months After Stroke

The EXCITE Randomized Clinical Trial

Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT; Carolee J. Winstein, PhD, PT; J. Philip Miller, AB; Edward Taub, PhD; Gitendra Uswatte, PhD; David Morris, PhD, PT; Carol Giuliani, PhD, PT; Kathye E. Light, PhD, PT; Deborah Nichols-Larsen, PhD, PT; for the EXCITE Investigators

JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.

Context  Single-site studies suggest that a 2-week program of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for patients more than 1 year after stroke who maintain some hand and wrist movement can improve upper extremity function that persists for at least 1 year.

Objective  To compare the effects of a 2-week multisite program of CIMT vs usual and customary care on improvement in upper extremity function among patients who had a first stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months.

Design and Setting  The Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial, a prospective, single-blind, randomized, multisite clinical trial conducted at 7 US academic institutions between January 2001 and January 2003.

Participants  Two hundred twenty-two individuals with predominantly ischemic stroke.

Interventions  Participants were assigned to receive either CIMT (n = 106; wearing a restraining mitt on the less-affected hand while engaging in repetitive task practice and behavioral shaping with the hemiplegic hand) or usual and customary care (n = 116; ranging from no treatment after concluding formal rehabilitation to pharmacologic or physiotherapeutic interventions); patients were stratified by sex, prestroke dominant side, side of stroke, and level of paretic arm function.

Main Outcome Measures  The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), a measure of laboratory time and strength-based ability and quality of movement (functional ability), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL), a measure of how well and how often 30 common daily activities are performed.

Results  From baseline to 12 months, the CIMT group showed greater improvements than the control group in both the WMFT Performance Time (decrease in mean time from 19.3 seconds to 9.3 seconds [52% reduction] vs from 24.0 seconds to 17.7 seconds [26% reduction]; between-group difference, 34% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 12%-51%]; P<.001) and in the MAL Amount of Use (on a 0-5 scale, increase from 1.21 to 2.13 vs from 1.15 to 1.65; between-group difference, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.05-0.80]; P<.001) and MAL Quality of Movement (on a 0-5 scale, increase from 1.26 to 2.23 vs 1.18 to 1.66; between-group difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.13-0.84]; P<.001). The CIMT group achieved a decrease of 19.5 in self-perceived hand function difficulty (Stroke Impact Scale hand domain) vs a decrease of 10.1 for the control group (between-group difference, 9.42 [95% CI, 0.27-18.57]; P=.05).

Conclusion  Among patients who had a stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months, CIMT produced statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in arm motor function that persisted for at least 1 year.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00057018


Author Affiliations: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Wolf); Departments of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy and Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Winstein); Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Mr Miller); Departments of Psychology (Drs Taub and Uswatte) and Physical Therapy (Dr Morris), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Allied Health Science, Curriculum in Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine (Dr Giuliani); Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr Light); and School of Allied Medical Professions, Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Nichols-Larsen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Interpreting the Randomized Clinical Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Bruce H. Dobkin
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(3):336-338.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stroke Recovery—Moving in an EXCITE-ing Direction
Andreas R. Luft and Daniel F. Hanley
JAMA. 2006;296(17):2141-2143.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke
Stoykov et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:945-953.
ABSTRACT  

The Effects of Repeated Rehabilitation "Tune-Ups" on Functional Recovery After Focal Ischemia in Rats
Clarke et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:886-894.
ABSTRACT  

Bound for Success: A Systematic Review of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy Supports Improved Arm and Hand Use
Huang et al.
ptjournal 2009;89:1126-1141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS
Lo et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:775-783.
ABSTRACT  

A Longitudinal View of Apathy and Its Impact After Stroke
Mayo et al.
Stroke 2009;40:3299-3307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minimal Detectable Change Scores for the Wolf Motor Function Test
Fritz et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:662-667.
ABSTRACT  

Interhemispheric Competition After Stroke: Brain Stimulation to Enhance Recovery of Function of the Affected Hand
Nowak et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:641-656.
ABSTRACT  

Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Platz et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:706-716.
ABSTRACT  

On "Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase..." Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Phys Ther. 2009;89:526-539.
Wolf
ptjournal 2009;89:993-995.
FULL TEXT  

Author Response
Hammer and Lindmark
ptjournal 2009;89:995-997.
FULL TEXT  

Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT
Dromerick et al.
Neurology 2009;73:195-201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery of Thumb and Finger Extension and Its Relation to Grasp Performance After Stroke
Lang et al.
J. Neurophysiol. 2009;102:451-459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Hemiparesis: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial
Chae et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:569-578.
ABSTRACT  

The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function
Ramachandran and Altschuler
Brain 2009;132:1693-1710.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods
Gauthier et al.
Stroke 2009;40:2468-2472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors
Lin et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:441-448.
ABSTRACT  

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis
Housman et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:505-514.
ABSTRACT  

Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be Streamlined?
Bogard et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:422-428.
ABSTRACT  

Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients
Lin et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:429-434.
ABSTRACT  

Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial
Ross et al.
Clin Rehabil 2009;23:492-503.
ABSTRACT  

Invited Commentary
Charles
ptjournal 2009;89:542-544.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of Forced Use on Arm Function in the Subacute Phase After Stroke: A Randomized, Clinical Pilot Study
Hammer and Lindmark
ptjournal 2009;89:526-539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial
Harris et al.
Stroke 2009;40:2123-2128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Potential Predictors of Motor and Functional Outcomes After Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy for Patients With Stroke
Lin et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:336-342.
ABSTRACT  

What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Levin et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:313-319.
ABSTRACT  

Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke
Page et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:382-388.
ABSTRACT  

Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial? A randomized pilot study during subacute post-stroke recovery
Hammer and Lindmark
Clin Rehabil 2009;23:424-433.
ABSTRACT  

What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up
Brogardh et al.
Clin Rehabil 2009;23:418-423.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Brain Polarization on Performance of a Motor Sequence Task After Chronic Stroke
Celnik et al.
Stroke 2009;40:1764-1771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
Hsieh et al.
Stroke 2009;40:1386-1391.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Dobkin
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:197-206.
ABSTRACT  

Mirror, Mirror, Move My Manu!
Sathian
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:207-208.
 

Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy
Rijntjes et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:275-280.
ABSTRACT  

Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dohle et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Imaging in Restorative Stroke Trials
Cramer
Stroke 2009;40:S28-S29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Future of Restorative Neurosciences in Stroke: Driving the Translational Research Pipeline From Basic Science to Rehabilitation of People After Stroke
Cumberland Consensus Working Group et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:97-107.
ABSTRACT  

Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Dose-Matched Control Intervention to Improve Motor Ability, Basic/Extended Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke
Lin et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:160-165.
ABSTRACT  

Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS): Bridging Basic and Clinical Science for Cellular and Neurogenic Factor Therapy in Treating Stroke
The STEPS Participants
Stroke 2009;40:510-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Prediction of Functional Outcome After Ischemic Stroke: The Surprising Importance of Periventricular White Matter Disease and Race
Kissela et al.
Stroke 2009;40:530-536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment
van Kuijk et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:45-51.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Woodbury et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:78-91.
ABSTRACT  

A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study
Knutson et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:17-25.
ABSTRACT  

Design for the Everest Randomized Trial of Cortical Stimulation and Rehabilitation for Arm Function Following Stroke
Harvey et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:32-44.
ABSTRACT  

Lower-Extremity Strength Differences Predict Activity Limitations in People With Chronic Stroke
Kluding and Gajewski
ptjournal 2009;89:73-81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Stroke Intervention: State of the Art
Alberts et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2845-2851.
FULL TEXT  

Motor neglect associated with loss of action inhibition
Coulthard et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:1401-1404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Rabadi et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:1071-1082.
ABSTRACT  

Rehabilitation of Reaching and Grasping Function in Severe Hemiplegic Patients Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy
Thrasher et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:706-714.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Intensity of Treatment and Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Individuals With Stroke-Induced Aphasia
Cherney et al.
JSLHR 2008;51:1282-1299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a Clinically Meaningful Motor Activity Log Outcome
Park et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:486-493.
ABSTRACT  

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke
Sawaki et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:505-513.
ABSTRACT  

Poststroke Neurogenesis: Emerging Principles of Migration and Localization of Immature Neurons
Ohab and Carmichael
Neuroscientist 2008;14:369-380.
ABSTRACT  

Constraint-Induced Movement therapy can improve hemiparetic progressive multiple sclerosis. Preliminary findings
Mark et al.
Mult Scler 2008;14:992-994.
ABSTRACT  

Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Volpe et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:305-310.
ABSTRACT  

Memory Formation in the Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to a Training Hand
Duque et al.
Cereb Cortex 2008;18:1395-1406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
Dahl et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:436-447.
ABSTRACT  

On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
Wolf
ptjournal 2008;88:680-684.
FULL TEXT  

Author Response
Page and Levine
ptjournal 2008;88:684-688.
FULL TEXT  

Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Wagner et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:652-663.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material
Gauthier et al.
Stroke 2008;39:1520-1525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emerging Subspecialties: Neurorehabilitation: Training neurologists to retrain the brain
Dimyan et al.
Neurology 2008;70:e52-e54.
FULL TEXT  

Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments
Dobkin
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:105-110.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121.
ABSTRACT  

On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.
Warden
ptjournal 2008;88:538-539.
FULL TEXT  

Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Page et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:333-340.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke
Buch et al.
Stroke 2008;39:910-917.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A study of constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke patients in Hong Kong
Myint et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:112-124.
ABSTRACT  

Poststroke Cerebral Peduncular Atrophy Correlates with a Measure of Corticospinal Tract Injury in the Cerebral Hemisphere
Mark et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:354-358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi et al.
Brain 2008;131:425-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Locomotor Training Using Body-Weight Support on a Treadmill in Conjunction With Ongoing Physical Therapy in a Child With Severe Cerebellar Ataxia
Cernak et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:88-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

NINDS Clinical Trials in Stroke: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Marler
Stroke 2007;38:3302-3307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bilateral Activity-Dependent Interactions in the Developing Corticospinal System
Friel and Martin
J. Neurosci. 2007;27:11083-11090.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?
Burns et al.
Clin Rehabil 2007;21:895-904.
ABSTRACT  

Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT)
Kaplon et al.
Clin Rehabil 2007;21:950-958.
ABSTRACT  

Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
L. Wolf et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:379-387.
ABSTRACT  

Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Wolf
ptjournal 2007;87:1212-1223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proximal paresis of the upper extremity in patients with stroke
Hatakenaka et al.
Neurology 2007;69:348-355.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial
Cramer et al.
Stroke 2007;38:2108-2114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The EXCITE Trial: A Major Step Forward for Restorative Therapies in Stroke
Cramer
Stroke 2007;38:2204-2205.
FULL TEXT  

An EXCITE-ing Treatment for Post-Stroke Upper-Extremity Paresis
JWatch Neurology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Carphology by Rajendra
PN 2007;7:66-66.
FULL TEXT  

Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Dobkin
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:3-13.
ABSTRACT  

"Forced use" helps patients with stroke regain function in their weak arm
BMJ 2006;333:1013-1013.
FULL TEXT  

Stroke recovery--moving in an EXCITE-ing direction.
Luft and Hanley
JAMA 2006;296:2141-2143.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.