You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 20, November 22/29, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Pain
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disk Disorders

Eugene Carragee, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:2485-2487.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The benefit of surgical treatment for some diseases affecting the lumbar spine is not controversial in many clinical circumstances, such as major trauma with gross instability, unstable spondylolisthesis, persistent or complicated spinal infections, and some spinal tumors with progressive neurologic loss. More commonly a patient may contemplate surgical treatment for complications of common degenerative conditions affecting the lumbar disk. In general, 2 clinical syndromes are associated with these degenerative conditions, and the clinical course and efficacy of interventions for each is very different. The first is primary back pain with little or no component of radicular symptoms due to nerve root irritation. The second is primary radicular pain, which usually has some component of back pain.

Surgical treatment for primary back pain associated with disk changes ("discogenic pain") is the more controversial and less successful.1-2 When examination of the lumbar spine reveals only common degenerative changes, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.


RELATED ARTICLES

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial
James N. Weinstein, Tor D. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Brett Hanscom, Jonathan S. Skinner, William A. Abdu, Alan S. Hilibrand, Scott D. Boden, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2441-2450.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Observational Cohort
James N. Weinstein, Jon D. Lurie, Tor D. Tosteson, Jonathan S. Skinner, Brett Hanscom, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Harry Herkowitz, Jeffrey Fischgrund, Frank P. Cammisa, Todd Albert, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2451-2459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial
Hout et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1351-1354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studies on Diagnostic Injections and Surgery for Low Back Pain: Problems, Advances, and Opportunities
Benzon
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:1523-1525.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.