This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (69)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular Interventions, Other  • Cardiovascular System  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Cardiac Diagnostic Tests  • Cardiovascular Intervention  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods

Thérèse A. Stukel, PhD; Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH; David E. Wennberg, MD, MPH; David A. Alter, MD, PhD; Daniel J. Gottlieb, MS; Marian J. Vermeulen, MHSc

JAMA. 2007;297:278-285.

Context  Comparisons of outcomes between patients treated and untreated in observational studies may be biased due to differences in patient prognosis between groups, often because of unobserved treatment selection biases.

Objective  To compare 4 analytic methods for removing the effects of selection bias in observational studies: multivariable model risk adjustment, propensity score risk adjustment, propensity-based matching, and instrumental variable analysis.

Design, Setting, and Patients  A national cohort of 122 124 patients who were elderly (aged 65-84 years), receiving Medicare, and hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 1994-1995, and who were eligible for cardiac catheterization. Baseline chart reviews were taken from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project and linked to Medicare health administrative data to provide a rich set of prognostic variables. Patients were followed up for 7 years through December 31, 2001, to assess the association between long-term survival and cardiac catheterization within 30 days of hospital admission.

Main Outcome Measure  Risk-adjusted relative mortality rate using each of the analytic methods.

Results  Patients who received cardiac catheterization (n = 73 238) were younger and had lower AMI severity than those who did not. After adjustment for prognostic factors by using standard statistical risk-adjustment methods, cardiac catheterization was associated with a 50% relative decrease in mortality (for multivariable model risk adjustment: adjusted relative risk [RR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.52; for propensity score risk adjustment: adjusted RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.53-0.55; and for propensity-based matching: adjusted RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.52-0.56). Using regional catheterization rate as an instrument, instrumental variable analysis showed a 16% relative decrease in mortality (adjusted RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90). The survival benefits of routine invasive care from randomized clinical trials are between 8% and 21%.

Conclusions  Estimates of the observational association of cardiac catheterization with long-term AMI mortality are highly sensitive to analytic method. All standard risk-adjustment methods have the same limitations regarding removal of unmeasured treatment selection biases. Compared with standard modeling, instrumental variable analysis may produce less biased estimates of treatment effects, but is more suited to answering policy questions than specific clinical questions.

Author Affiliations: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario (Drs Stukel and Alter, and Ms Vermeulen); Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Stukel and Fisher, and Mr Gottlieb); Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, and Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario (Drs Stukel and Alter); Veterans Administration Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vt (Dr Fisher); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland (Dr Wennberg); and Division of Cardiology and the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Alter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Review: Use of Electronic Medical Records for Health Outcomes Research: A Literature Review
Dean et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:611-638.
ABSTRACT  

Systematic Review: Charged-Particle Radiation Therapy for Cancer
Terasawa et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:556-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prescription of antihypertensive agents to haemodialysis patients: time trends and associations with patient characteristics, country and survival in the DOPPS
Lopes et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:2809-2816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients.
Suaya et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:25-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysis methods for observational studies effects of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality of coronary patients.
Stukel and Alter
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:34-35.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study
Meier and Duvernoy
Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:631-631.
FULL TEXT  

Syncope and Its Consequences in Patients With Dementia Receiving Cholinesterase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Gill et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:867-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on Incident AIDS Using Calendar Period as an Instrumental Variable
Cain et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:1124-1132.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
Hlatky and Heidenreich
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1459-1466.
FULL TEXT  

Live Attenuated or Inactivated Influenza Vaccines and Medical Encounters for Respiratory Illnesses Among US Military Personnel
Wang et al.
JAMA 2009;301:945-953.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the problem of treatment selection bias
Hirsch et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:645-654.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The survival advantage for haemodialysis patients taking vitamin D is questioned: findings from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study
Tentori et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:963-972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Policy Research: Using Evidence to Improve Healthcare Delivery Systems
Ross and Gross
Circulation 2009;119:891-898.
FULL TEXT  

Instrumental Variable Analysis for Estimation of Treatment Effects With Dichotomous Outcomes
Rassen et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:273-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings
Tannen et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b81-b81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer--Reply
Lu-Yao et al.
JAMA 2009;301:35-35.
FULL TEXT  

Registries That Show Efficacy: Good, but Not Good Enough
Levine and Julian
JCO 2008;26:5316-5319.
FULL TEXT  

What Conclusions Should Be Drawn between Critical Care Physician Management and Patient Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit?
Arends and Vandenbroucke
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:768-769.
FULL TEXT  

Bias: Considerations for research practice
Gerhard
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:2159-2168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs and Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Multidetector CT Angiography in Patients without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
Min et al.
Radiology 2008;249:62-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond the Randomized Clinical Trial: The Role of Effectiveness Studies in Evaluating Cardiovascular Therapies
Nallamothu et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1294-1303.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of In-Hospital Revascularization on Survival in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Congestive Heart Failure
Steg et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1163-1171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Angiography in Angina: Reliability and Validity
Hemingway et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:221-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Some Old and Some New Statistical Tools for Outcomes Research
Normand
Circulation 2008;118:872-884.
FULL TEXT  

Survival Following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
Lu-Yao et al.
JAMA 2008;300:173-181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris
Sekhri et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1058-1061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence from Nonrandomized Studies: A Case Study on the Estimation of Causal Effects
Schmoor et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1120-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the safety of drugs through observational research
Simpson
Heart 2008;94:129-130.
FULL TEXT  

Substitution of Fractionated for Unfractionated Heparin During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Has the Problem Been Solved?
Eisenberg
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2247-2248.
FULL TEXT  

Analytic Approaches to Observational Studies With Treatment Selection Bias
Novikov and Kalter-Leibovici
JAMA 2007;297:2077-2077.
FULL TEXT  

Analytic Approaches to Observational Studies With Treatment Selection Bias
Vandenbroucke
JAMA 2007;297:2077-2078.
FULL TEXT  

Using Observational Data to Estimate Treatment Effects
Stukel et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2078-2079.
FULL TEXT  

JournalScan
Lindsay
Heart 2007;93:645-647.
FULL TEXT  

Observational studies should carry a health warning
BMJ 2007;334:179-179.
FULL TEXT  

Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data
D'Agostino and D'Agostino
JAMA 2007;297:314-316.
FULL TEXT