You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 4, January 24/31, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Rheumatology
 •Osteoporosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Risk of Subsequent Fracture After Low-Trauma Fracture in Men and Women

Jacqueline R. Center, MBBS, PhD; Dana Bliuc, MMed; Tuan V. Nguyen, PhD; John A. Eisman, MBBS, PhD

JAMA. 2007;297:387-394.

Context  There are few published long-term data on absolute risk of subsequent fracture (refracture) following initial low-trauma fracture in women and fewer in men.

Objective  To examine long-term risk of subsequent fracture following initial osteoporotic fracture in men and women.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Prospective cohort study (Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study) in Australia of 2245 community-dwelling women and 1760 men aged 60 years or older followed up for 16 years from July 1989 through April 2005.

Main Outcome Measure  Incidence of first (initial) fracture and incidence of subsequent fracture according to sex, age group, and time since first fracture. Relative risk was determined by comparing risk of subsequent fracture with risk of initial fracture.

Results  There were 905 women and 337 men with an initial fracture, of whom 253 women and 71 men experienced a subsequent fracture. Relative risk (RR) of subsequent fracture in women was 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-2.25) and in men was 3.47 (95% CI, 2.68-4.48). As a result, absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar in women and men and at least as great as the initial fracture risk for a woman 10 years older. Thus, women and men aged 60 to 69 years had absolute refracture rates of 36/1000 person-years (95% CI, 26-48/1000) and 37/1000 person-years (95% CI, 23-59/1000), respectively. The increase in absolute fracture risk remained for up to 10 years, by which time 40% to 60% of surviving women and men experienced a subsequent fracture. All fracture locations apart from rib (men) and ankle (women) resulted in increased subsequent fracture risk, with highest RRs following hip (RR, 9.97; 95% CI, 1.38-71.98) and clinical vertebral (RR, 15.12; 95% CI, 6.06-37.69) fractures in younger men. In multivariate analyses, femoral neck bone mineral density, age, and smoking were predictors of subsequent fracture in women and femoral neck bone mineral density, physical activity, and calcium intake were predictors in men.

Conclusion  After an initial low-trauma fracture, absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar for men and women. This increased risk occurred for virtually all clinical fractures and persisted for up to 10 years.


Author Affiliations: Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men
Rahmani and Morin
CMAJ 2009;181:815-820.
FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for the Development of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures Among Older Men
THOMAS-JOHN et al.
The Journal of Rheumatology 2009;36:1947-1952.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality Risk Associated With Low-Trauma Osteoporotic Fracture and Subsequent Fracture in Men and Women
Bliuc et al.
JAMA 2009;301:513-521.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures
van Geel et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:99-102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Osteoporosis-Related Fracture: A Multifactoral Osteopathic Approach
Gronholz
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2008;108:575-585.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis in Men
Khosla et al.
Endocr. Rev. 2008;29:441-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endogenous Sex Hormones and Incident Fracture Risk in Older Men: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study
Meier et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:47-54.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The American Orthopaedic Association's "Own the Bone" Initiative to Prevent Secondary Fractures
Tosi et al.
JBJS 2008;90:163-173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Trauma Fractures and Low Bone Mineral Density in Older Women and Men
Mackey et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2381-2388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Trauma Fractures and Bone Mineral Density
Khosla
JAMA 2007;298:2418-2419.
FULL TEXT  

What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
Cole et al.
JBJS 2007;89:2560-2577.
FULL TEXT  

Absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar in women and men
Berry and Kiel
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:123-123.
FULL TEXT  

One fracture predicts another, especially in men
BMJ 2007;334:230-231.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.