You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 11, September 19, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Preliminary Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •JAMA News Video
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Renal Diseases
 •Dialysis
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of Life

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bruce F. Culleton, MD, MSc; Michael Walsh, MD; Scott W. Klarenbach, MD, MSc; Garth Mortis, MD; Narine Scott-Douglas, MD, PhD; Robert R. Quinn, MD; Marcello Tonelli, MD, SM; Sarah Donnelly, MD; Matthias G. Friedrich, MD; Andreas Kumar, MD; Houman Mahallati, MD; Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, MD, PhD; Braden J. Manns, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2007;298:1291-1299.

Context  Morbidity and mortality rates in hemodialysis patients remain excessive. Alterations in the delivery of dialysis may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Objective  To compare the effects of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on change in left ventricular mass and health-related quality of life over 6 months.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A 2-group, parallel, randomized controlled trial conducted at 2 Canadian university centers between August 2004 and December 2006. A total of 52 patients undergoing hemodialysis were recruited.

Intervention  Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive nocturnal hemodialysis 6 times weekly or conventional hemodialysis 3 times weekly.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome was change in left ventricular mass, as measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported quality of life, blood pressure, mineral metabolism, and use of medications.

Results  Frequent nocturnal hemodialysis significantly improved the primary outcome (mean left ventricular mass difference between groups, 15.3 g, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 29.6 g; P = .04). Frequent nocturnal hemodialysis did not significantly improve quality of life (difference of change in EuroQol 5-D index from baseline, 0.05; 95% CI, –0.07 to 0.17; P = .43). However, frequent nocturnal hemodialysis was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvements in selected kidney-specific domains of quality of life (= .01 for effects of kidney disease and = .02 for burden of kidney disease). Frequent nocturnal hemodialysis was also associated with improvements in systolic blood pressure (= .01 after adjustment) and mineral metabolism, including a reduction in or discontinuation of antihypertensive medications (16/26 patients in the nocturnal hemodialysis group vs 3/25 patients in the conventional hemodialysis group; P < .001) and oral phosphate binders (19/26 patients in the nocturnal hemodialysis group vs 3/25 patients in the conventional dialysis group; P < .001). No benefit in anemia management was seen with nocturnal hemodialysis.

Conclusion  This preliminary study revealed that, compared with conventional hemodialysis (3 times weekly), frequent nocturnal hemodialysis improved left ventricular mass, reduced the need for blood pressure medications, improved some measures of mineral metabolism, and improved selected measures of quality of life.

Trial Registration  isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN25858715


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Drs Culleton, Walsh, Mortis, Scott-Douglas, Quinn, Hemmelgarn, and Manns); Alberta Kidney Disease Network, Alberta, Canada (Drs Culleton, Klarenbach, Scott-Douglas, Tonelli, Hemmelgarn, and Manns); Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary (Drs Culleton, Scott-Douglas, Friedrich, Hemmelgarn, and Manns); Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (Drs Klarenbach and Tonelli); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary (Drs Donnelly and Mahallati); Stephenson Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Centre at the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary (Drs Friedrich and Kumar); and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary (Drs Hemmelgarn and Manns). Dr Culleton is now with Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois.


RELATED ARTICLE

Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis—A Step Forward?
Alan S. Kliger
JAMA. 2007;298(11):1331-1333.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness of Frequent In-Center Hemodialysis
Lee et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:1792-1797.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Left ventricular dysfunction in the haemodialysis population
Sood et al.
NDT Plus 2008;1:199-205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short daily haemodialysis: survival in 415 patients treated for 1006 patient-years
Kjellstrand et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;0:gfn210v1-gfn210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Kidney disease in cardiology
Herzog
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis A Step Forward?
Kliger
JAMA 2007;298:1331-1333.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.