 |
|
CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Prescribing AmiodaroneAn Evidence-Based Review of Clinical Indications
Patricia Vassallo, MD;
Richard G. Trohman, MD
JAMA. 2007;298:1312-1322.
Context Although amiodarone is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration only for refractory ventricular arrhythmias, it is one of the most frequently prescribed antiarrhythmic medications in the United States.
Objective To evaluate and synthesize evidence regarding optimal use of amiodarone for various arrhythmias.
Evidence Acquisition Systematic search of MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other studies with clinical pertinence. The search was limited to human-participant, English-language reports published between 1970 and 2007. Amiodarone was searched using the terms adverse effects, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, congestive heart failure, electrical storm, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, surgery, ventricular arrhythmia, ventricular fibrillation, and Wolff-Parkinson-White. Bibliographies of identified articles and guidelines from official societies were reviewed for additional references. Ninety-two identified studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review.
Evidence Synthesis Amiodarone may have clinical value in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure as first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation, though other agents are available. Amiodarone is useful in acute management of sustained ventricular tachyarrythmias, regardless of hemodynamic stability. The only role for prophylactic amiodarone is in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Amiodarone may be effective as an adjunct to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy to reduce number of shocks. However, amiodarone has a number of serious adverse effects, including corneal microdeposits (>90%), optic neuropathy/neuritis ( 1%-2%), blue-gray skin discoloration (4%-9%), photosensitivity (25%-75%), hypothyroidism (6%), hyperthyroidism (0.9%-2%), pulmonary toxicity (1%-17%), peripheral neuropathy (0.3% annually), and hepatotoxicity (elevated enzyme levels, 15%-30%; hepatitis and cirrhosis, <3% [0.6% annually]).
Conclusion Amiodarone should be used with close follow-up in patients who are likely to derive the most benefit, namely those with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction, those with acute sustained ventricular arrhythmias, those about to undergo cardiac surgery, and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and symptomatic shocks.
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia, and Pacemaker Service, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
RELATED LETTERS
Use of Amiodarone
John R. Kapoor
JAMA. 2007;298(22):2617.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Amiodarone
Michele Coceani
JAMA. 2007;298(22):2617-2618.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Amiodarone Use in Patients with Documented Hypersensitivity to Intravenous Contrast Dye
Snider et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2008;42:1349-1350.
FULL TEXT
Symptomatic heart failure is the most important clinical correlate of impaired quality of life, anxiety, and depression in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a single-centre, cross-sectional study in 610 patients
Johansen et al.
Europace 2008;10:545-551.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Synergistic activity of azoles with amiodarone against clinically resistant Candida albicans tested by chequerboard and time-kill methods
Guo et al.
J Med Microbiol 2008;57:457-462.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Amiodarone
Kapoor
JAMA 2007;298:2617-2617.
FULL TEXT
Use of Amiodarone
Coceani
JAMA 2007;298:2617-2618.
FULL TEXT
|
