You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 13, October 3, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •JAMA News Video
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Sex Differences in the Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Lesley H. Curtis, PhD; Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, MHS; Alisa M. Shea, MPH; Bradley G. Hammill, MS; Adrian F. Hernandez, MD, MHS; Kevin A. Schulman, MD

JAMA. 2007;298:1517-1524.

Context  Previous studies of sex differences in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) predate recent expansions in Medicare coverage and did not provide patient follow-up over multiple years.

Objective  To examine sex differences in ICD use for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Analysis of a 5% national sample of research-identifiable files obtained from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the period 1991 through 2005. Patients were those aged 65 years or older with Medicare fee-for-service coverage and diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and either heart failure or cardiomyopathy but no prior cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia (ie, the primary prevention cohort [n = 65 917 men and 70 504 women]), or with cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia (ie, the secondary prevention cohort [n = 52 252 men and 47 411 women]), from 1999 through 2005.

Main Outcome Measures  Receipt of ICD therapy and all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Results  In the 2005 primary prevention cohort, 32.3 per 1000 men and 8.6 per 1000 women received ICD therapy within 1 year of cohort entry. In multivariate analyses, men were more likely than women to receive ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-3.47). Among men and women alive at 180 days after cohort entry, the hazard of mortality in the subsequent year was not significantly lower among those who received ICD therapy (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82-1.23). In the 2005 secondary prevention cohort, 102.2 per 1000 men and 38.4 per 1000 women received ICD therapy. Controlling for demographic variables and comorbid conditions, men were more likely than women to receive ICD therapy (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.30-2.59). Among men and women alive at 30 days after cohort entry, the hazard of mortality in the subsequent year was significantly lower among those who received ICD therapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.71).

Conclusion  In the Medicare population, women are significantly less likely than men to receive ICD therapy for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.


Author Affiliations: Duke Clinical Research Institute (Drs Curtis, Al-Khatib, Hernandez, and Schulman and Ms Shea and Mr Hammill) and Department of Medicine (Drs Curtis, Al-Khatib, Hernandez, and Schulman), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.


RELATED ARTICLES

Sex and Racial Differences in the Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
Adrian F. Hernandez, Gregg C. Fonarow, Li Liang, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Lesley H. Curtis, Kenneth A. LaBresh, Clyde W. Yancy, Nancy M. Albert, and Eric D. Peterson
JAMA. 2007;298(13):1525-1532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disparities in Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Moving Beyond Process Measures to Outcomes Data
Rita F. Redberg
JAMA. 2007;298(13):1564-1566.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
Piccini et al.
Circulation 2008;118:926-933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Congenital Heart Disease: Should a Woman Be More Like a Man?
Warnes
Circulation 2008;118:3-5.
FULL TEXT  

Kidney Dysfunction and Sudden Cardiac Death Among Women With Coronary Heart Disease
Deo et al.
Hypertension 2008;51:1578-1582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex matters: gender disparities in quality and outcomes of care
Bierman
CMAJ 2007;177:1520-1521.
FULL TEXT  

Racial and Gender Disparities in Use of ICDs
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Disparities in Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Moving Beyond Process Measures to Outcomes Data
Redberg
JAMA 2007;298:1564-1566.
FULL TEXT  

Sex, Race, and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.