You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 17, November 7, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Framework for Health Care Organizations to Develop and Evaluate a Safety Scorecard

Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Sean M. Berenholtz, MD, MHS; Dale M. Needham, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2007;298(17):2063-2065.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The demand to improve patient safety is increasing within health care organizations. Boards of trustees have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure patient safety, and senior management is often charged with evaluating and improving patient safety. External agencies such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Leapfrog Group, and the Joint Commission have developed measures to evaluate patient safety and quality of care.

Many hospitals have responded to this heightened focus on patient safety by creating scorecards to evaluate and publicly report progress in improving quality and safety. Scorecards are attractive because hospital leaders and other interested parties can quickly obtain a broad overview of patient safety performance. These scorecards tend to include measures required by the CMS, The Joint Commission, and insurers, as well as measures developed by individual hospitals for local . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Framework

Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Surgery (Drs Pronovost and Berenholtz) and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Needham), School of Medicine; and Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dr Pronovost), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Framework for Patient Safety Research and Improvement
Pronovost et al.
Circulation 2009;119:330-337.
FULL TEXT  

Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation
Pronovost et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a1714-a1714.
FULL TEXT  

Accounting Principles and Measuring Health Care Quality--Reply
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 2008;299:764-765.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.