 |
|
Implementation of a Statewide System for Coronary Reperfusion for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
James G. Jollis, MD;
Mayme L. Roettig, RN, MSN;
Akinyele O. Aluko, MD;
Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD;
Robert J. Applegate, MD;
Joseph D. Babb, MD;
Peter B. Berger, MD;
David J. Bohle, MD;
Sidney M. Fletcher, MD;
J. Lee Garvey, MD;
William R. Hathaway, MD;
James W. Hoekstra, MD;
Robert V. Kelly, MD;
William T. Maddox Jr, MD;
Joseph R. Shiber, MD;
F. Scott Valeri, MD;
Bradley A. Watling, MD;
B. Hadley Wilson, MD;
Christopher B. Granger, MD; for the Reperfusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction in North Carolina Emergency Departments (RACE) Investigators
JAMA. 2007;298(20):2371-2380. Published online November 4, 2007 (doi:10.1001 /jama.298.20.joc70124).
Context Despite 2 decades of evidence demonstrating benefits from prompt coronary reperfusion, registries continue to show that many patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated too slowly or not at all.
Objective To establish a statewide system for reperfusion, as exists for trauma care, to overcome systematic barriers.
Design and Setting A quality improvement study that examined the change in speed and rate of coronary reperfusion after system implementation in 5 regions in North Carolina involving 65 hospitals and associated emergency medical systems (10 percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] hospitals and 55 non-PCI hospitals).
Patients A total of 1164 patients with STEMI (579 preintervention and 585 postintervention) eligible for reperfusion were treated at PCI hospitals (median age 61 years, 31% women, 4% Killip class III or IV). A total of 925 patients with STEMI (518 preintervention and 407 postintervention) were treated at non-PCI hospitals (median age 62 years, 32% women, 4% Killip class III or IV).
Interventions Early diagnosis and the most expedient coronary reperfusion method at each point of care: emergency medical systems, emergency department, catheterization laboratory, and transfer. Within 5 regions, PCI hospitals agreed to provide single-call catheterization laboratory activation by emergency medical personnel, accept patients regardless of bed availability, and improve STEMI care for the entire region regardless of hospital affiliation.
Main Outcome Measures Reperfusion times and rates 3 months before (July to September 2005) and 3 months after (January to March 2007) a year-long implementation.
Results Median reperfusion times significantly improved according to first door-to-device (presenting to PCI hospital 85 to 74 minutes, P < .001; transferred to PCI hospital 165 to 128 minutes, P < .001), door-to-needle in non-PCI hospitals (35 to 29 minutes, P = .002), and door-in to door-out for patients transferred from non-PCI hospitals (120 to 71 minutes, P < .001). Nonreperfusion rates were unchanged (15%) in non-PCI hospitals and decreased from 23% to 11% in the PCI hospitals. For patients presenting to or transferred to PCI hospitals, clinical outcomes including death, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock did not significantly change following the intervention.
Conclusions A statewide program focused on regional systems for reperfusion for STEMI can significantly improve quality of care. Further research is needed to ensure that programs that result in improved application of reperfusion treatments will lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity from STEMI.
Author Affiliations: Department of Cardiology (Dr Jollis) and Duke Clinical Research Institute (Drs Anstrom and Granger, and Ms Roettig), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Departments of Emergency Medicine (Dr Fletcher) and Cardiology (Dr Aluko), Presbyterian Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina; Departments of Cardiology (Dr Applegate) and Emergency Medicine (Dr Hoekstra), Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Departments of Cardiology (Dr Babb) and Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Dr Shiber), East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Center for Clinical Studies, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania (Dr Berger); Department of Cardiology, Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Bohle); Departments of Emergency Medicine (Dr Garvey) and Cardiology (Dr Wilson), Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; Department of Cardiology, Mission Memorial Hospital, Asheville, North Carolina (Drs Hathaway and Maddox); Department of Cardiology, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (Dr Kelly); and Departments of Cardiology (Dr Valeri) and Emergency Medicine (Dr Watling), Carolinas Medical Center-Mercy, Charlotte, North Carolina.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Clinical impact of an inter-hospital transfer strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: the Emilia-Romagna ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction network
Manari et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:1834-1842.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part II: Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy, Integrated Treatment Recommendations, and Future Directions
Stone
Circulation 2008;118:552-566.
FULL TEXT
The year in interventional cardiology.
Dixon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2355-2369.
FULL TEXT
Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Bogaty et al.
NEJM 2008;358:1751-1753.
FULL TEXT
Tardy Pardee: Moving Medical Effectiveness to the Forefront
Jollis
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:105-107.
FULL TEXT
An Organized "Systems" Approach Improves STEMI Care
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT
Measuring the Quality of Primary PCI for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Time for Balance
Masoudi
JAMA 2007;298:2790-2791.
FULL TEXT
|
