This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (59)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Radiation Therapy  • Women's Health, Other  • Angiology  • Computed Tomography  • Alert me on articles by topic

Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD; Milena J. Henzlova, MD, PhD; Sanjay Rajagopalan, MD

JAMA. 2007;298:317-323.

Context  Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has become a common diagnostic test, yet there are little data on its associated cancer risk. The recent Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII Phase 2 report provides a framework for estimating lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence associated with radiation exposure from a CTCA study, using the most current data available on health effects of radiation.

Objectives  To determine the LAR of cancer incidence associated with radiation exposure from a 64-slice CTCA study and to evaluate the influence of age, sex, and scan protocol on cancer risk.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Organ doses from 64-slice CTCA to standardized phantom (computational model) male and female patients were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation methods, using standard spiral CT protocols. Age- and sex-specific LARs of individual cancers were estimated using the approach of BEIR VII and summed to obtain whole-body LARs.

Main Outcome Measures  Whole-body and organ LARs of cancer incidence.

Results  Organ doses ranged from 42 to 91 mSv for the lungs and 50 to 80 mSv for the female breast. Lifetime cancer risk estimates for standard cardiac scans varied from 1 in 143 for a 20-year-old woman to 1 in 3261 for an 80-year-old man. Use of simulated electrocardiographically controlled tube current modulation (ECTCM) decreased these risk estimates to 1 in 219 and 1 in 5017, respectively. Estimated cancer risks using ECTCM for a 60-year-old woman and a 60-year-old man were 1 in 715 and 1 in 1911, respectively. A combined scan of the heart and aorta had higher LARs, up to 1 in 114 for a 20-year-old woman. The highest organ LARs were for lung cancer and, in younger women, breast cancer.

Conclusions  These estimates derived from our simulation models suggest that use of 64-slice CTCA is associated with a nonnegligible LAR of cancer. This risk varies markedly and is considerably greater for women, younger patients, and for combined cardiac and aortic scans.

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York (Dr Einstein); Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Henzlova); and Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Rajagopalan).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Whitlock et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;0:0000605-200811040-00245-E-245.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combined coronary and late-enhanced multidetector-computed tomography for delineation of the etiology of left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
le Polain de Waroux et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:2544-2551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Electrocardiographic Pulsing Windows and Heart Rate: Effect on Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography
Weustink et al.
Radiology 2008;248:792-798.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Converting Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose at CT
Huda et al.
Radiology 2008;248:995-1003.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology
BEDETTI et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2008;81:699-705.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Limitations of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)
Nicol and Stirrup
BMJ 2008;337:a1402-a1402.
FULL TEXT  

Perspective: The Case Against Radioiodine Remnant Ablation in Patients with Well-Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
Hay et al.
JNM 2008;49:1395-1397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective versus Retrospective ECG Gating for 64-Detector CT of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose
Shuman et al.
Radiology 2008;248:431-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Occult Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Individuals
Choi et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:357-365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score.
Henneman et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:216-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Mettler et al.
Radiology 2008;248:254-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SPECT/CT Imaging: Clinical Utility of an Emerging Technology
Bybel et al.
RadioGraphics 2008;28:1097-1113.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening patients with multi-detector computed axial tomography (MDCT): when will we inform patients about the risk of radiation?
Baskerville
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:323-324.
FULL TEXT  

Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology
HALL and BRENNER
Br. J. Radiol. 2008;81:362-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation
Gould et al.
JNM 2008;49:738-745.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES
Martin
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;0:ncm495v1-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography
Gottlieb and Lima
Circulation 2008;117:1318-1332.
FULL TEXT  

All High-Risk Patients Should Not Be Screened With Computed Tomographic Angiography
Kramer
Circulation 2008;117:1333-1339.
FULL TEXT  

Another Step Forward in CT Angiography
Lima
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:187-189.
FULL TEXT  

Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose
Earls et al.
Radiology 2008;246:742-753.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Schroeder et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:531-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating
Husmann et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Back to the future: coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering
Schoenhagen
Eur Heart J 2008;29:153-154.
FULL TEXT  

Business Aspects of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Tackling the Challenges
Bateman
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:111-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Don't Bury the V/Q Scan: It's as Good as Multidetector CT Angiograms with a Lot Less Radiation Exposure
Freeman
JNM 2008;49:5-8.
FULL TEXT  

Coronary Heart Disease Risk Assessment by Traditional Risk Factors and Newer Subclinical Disease Imaging: Is a "One-Size-Fits-All" Approach the Best Option?
Preis and O'Donnell
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2399-2401.
FULL TEXT  

64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abdulla et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:3042-3050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply: Attenuation Correction for Stress and Rest PET 82Rb Myocardial Perfusion Images
Gould and Pan
JNM 2007;48:1913-1914.
FULL TEXT  

Replacing diagnostic catheterization with coronary CT angiography: the final frontier
Schoepf et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2305-2306.
FULL TEXT  

Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging
Einstein et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1290-1305.
FULL TEXT  

How Safe Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Cancer Risk from CT-Coronary Angiography
JWatch General 2007;2007:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Cancer Risk from CT-Coronary Angiography
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT