This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (24)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Aging/ Geriatrics  • Osteoporosis  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The HIP PRO Randomized Controlled Trial

Douglas P. Kiel, MD, MPH; Jay Magaziner, PhD; Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD; Linda Ball, PhD; Bruce A. Barton, PhD; Kathleen M. Brown, PhD; Judith P. Stone, MSW; Dawn Dewkett, BS; Stanley J. Birge, MD

JAMA. 2007;298:413-422.

Context  Past studies of the efficacy of hip protectors to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents have had conflicting results, possibly due to potential biases from clustered randomization designs and modest adherence to intervention.

Objective  To determine whether an energy-absorbing and energy-dispersing hip protector would reduce the risk of hip fracture when worn by nursing home residents.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in which 37 nursing homes were randomly assigned to having residents wear a 1-sided hip protector on the left or right hip. Participants were 1042 nursing home residents (mean [SD] aged 85 [7] years; 79% women) who consented and adhered to the hip protector use during a 2-week run-in period and were enrolled. Participating facilities were in greater Boston, Massachusetts, St Louis, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland from October 2002 to October 2004. Mean duration of participation for nursing home residents was 7.8 months. None were withdrawn because of adverse effects.

Intervention(s)  Undergarments with a 1-sided hip protector made of a 0.32-cm outer layer of polyethylene (2.7 kg/m³) backed by a hard high-density polyethylene shield (0.95 cm) that was backed by 0.9 kg/m³ of 1.27-kg ethylene vinyl acetate foam. Each facility was visited 3 times per week to assess adherence and provide staff support.

Main Outcome Measure  Adjudicated hip fracture occurrences on padded vs unpadded hips.

Results  After a 20-month follow-up (676 person-years of observation), the study was terminated due to a lack of efficacy. The incidence rate of hip fracture on protected vs unprotected hips did not differ (3.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-4.4% vs 2.5%; 95% CI, 1.3%-3.7%; P = .70). For the 334 nursing home residents with greater than 80% adherence to hip protector use, the incidence rate of hip fracture on protected vs unprotected hips did not differ (5.3%; 95% CI, 2.6%-8.8% vs 3.5%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.7%; P = .42). Overall adherence was 73.8%.

Conclusions  In this clinical trial of an energy-absorbing/shunting hip protector conducted in US nursing homes, we were unable to detect a protective effect on the risk of hip fracture, despite good adherence to protocol. These results add to the increasing body of evidence that hip protectors, as currently designed, are not effective for preventing hip fracture among nursing home residents.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058864

Author Affiliations: Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Kiel and Mss Stone and Dewkett); Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Magaziner); Program on Aging, Disability and Long-Term Care, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Zimmerman); Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri (Drs Ball and Birge); Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore (Drs Barton and Brown).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Hip Protectors and Hip Fracture
Peter Cummings
JAMA. 2007;298(18):2139.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Hip Protectors for Preventing Hip Fracture
Pekka Kannus and Jari Parkkari
JAMA. 2007;298(4):454-455.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men
Rahmani and Morin
CMAJ 2009;181:815-820.
FULL TEXT  

Postoperative Management of Hip Fractures: Recent inaugural IBMS BoneKEy Online Forum focused on pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to managing patients post-hip fracture
Andrews
IBMS BoneKEy 2009;6:55-62.
FULL TEXT  

What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
Cole et al.
JBJS 2008;90:2804-2822.
FULL TEXT  

Update on the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis
Cole et al.
Br Med Bull 2008;86:129-143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis Medication Use in Nursing Home Patients With Fractures in 1 US State
Parikh et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1111-1115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis in Men
Ebeling
NEJM 2008;358:1474-1482.
FULL TEXT  

Factors associated with hip protector adherence among older people in residential care
Cryer et al.
Inj. Prev. 2008;14:24-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls
Jarvinen et al.
BMJ 2008;336:124-126.
FULL TEXT  

Hip Protectors and Hip Fracture
Cummings
JAMA 2007;298:2139-2139.
FULL TEXT  

Hip, Hip Protectors, Hooray?
Andrews
IBMS BoneKEy 2007;4:262-266.
FULL TEXT  

Hip Protectors Fail to Prevent Hip Fractures in Nursing Home Patients
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Do Hip Protectors Prevent Hip Fracture in Nursing Home Residents?
JWatch General 2007;2007:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Hip Protectors for Preventing Hip Fracture
Kannus and Parkkari
JAMA 2007;298:454-455.
FULL TEXT