You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 9, September 5, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating Resident Duty Hour Reforms

More Work to Do

David O. Meltzer, MD, PhD; Vineet M. Arora, MD, MA

JAMA. 2007;298(9):1055-1057.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The long work hours of medical residents have received increasing attention in recent years due to concerns about patient safety and the health and education of residents themselves. Although patient safety has been heavily emphasized in the media coverage of duty hour reforms, the evidence that long resident duty hours adversely affect patient outcomes is relatively poor.1 Indeed, when the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) decided to implement duty hour reforms, some expressed concern that patient care could suffer, emphasizing increased discontinuities of care, or the costs of added staffing needed to provide coverage following duty hour restrictions.2-3 Such concerns make empirical analyses of the consequences of duty hour restrictions especially important.

The 2 articles by Volpp and colleagues4-5 in this issue of JAMA are among the first studies to examine changes in patient outcomes following ACGME duty . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Meltzer and Arora) and Economics (Dr Meltzer), and Graduate School of Public Policy Studies (Dr Meltzer), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Resident Duty-Hour Reform Associated with Increased Morbidity Following Hip Fracture
Browne et al.
JBJS 2009;91:2079-2085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liability of the Sleep-Deprived Resident
Berlin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:845-851.
FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Resident Work-Hour Regulation on Psychiatry
Rabjohn and Yager
Am. J. Psychiatry 2008;165:308-311.
FULL TEXT  

Resident Duty Hour Reform and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients
Neely
JAMA 2007;298:2865-2865.
FULL TEXT  

Resident Duty Hour Reform and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients
Bell
JAMA 2007;298:2865-2866.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.