You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 19, May 21, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Nursing Care
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Sepsis Care

The Road Ahead

Jeremy M. Kahn, MD, MSc; David W. Bates, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2008;299(19):2322-2323.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In recent years there have been unprecedented advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of sepsis syndrome.1-3 This work has culminated in several clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of targeted interventions to improve sepsis-related outcomes.4-6 These interventions include not only novel therapeutic agents such as drotrecogin alfa but also treatments directed at improving the way more traditional therapy is delivered, such as early resuscitation and low-tidal volume ventilation for acute lung injury.4-6

Unfortunately the gaps between evidence and practice have long been huge.7 Indeed, most available data suggest that clinical trial and observational study results have not yet changed clinical practice in sepsis care. Few emergency departments have implemented protocols for early resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis, delayed and inappropriate antibiotic administration remains common, and many patients with acute lung injury receive mechanical ventilation with potentially . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Kahn); and Division of General Internal Medicine and Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Bates).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Improvement in Process of Care and Outcome After a Multicenter Severe Sepsis Educational Program in Spain
Ricard Ferrer, Antonio Artigas, Mitchell M. Levy, Jesús Blanco, Gumersindo González-Díaz, José Garnacho-Montero, Jordi Ibáñez, Eduardo Palencia, Manuel Quintana, María Victoria de la Torre-Prados, and for the Edusepsis Study Group
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2294-2303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Sepsis Outcome
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2008;2008:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.