You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 8, February 27, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Humanities
 •Medicine and the Media
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Critical Lessons From the ENHANCE Trial

Philip Greenland, MD; Donald Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM

JAMA. 2008;299(8):953-955.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The unusual release on January 14, 2008, in the news media and on a drug company Web site,1 of a portion of the Effect of Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Alone on Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Artery (ENHANCE) trial data resulted in numerous articles and commentaries in the lay media. The availability of only fragmentary information created massive confusion and raised many more questions than answers for patients, physicians, pharmaceutical companies, and regulators. A full report of the ENHANCE trial in a peer-reviewed medical journal is not expected for months, and the first public presentation of the study's findings in a medical setting will not occur before late March 2008.

The purpose of this Commentary is to review key features of the ENHANCE study and to point to lessons that should be learned by drug companies, clinical researchers, clinicians, and health agencies from . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Background on the ENHANCE Trial

Lesson 1: Drug Trials Should Not Be Done for Marketing Purposes Only

Lesson 2: The News Media Must Be Sure to Get the Facts Straight. Errors in Reporting Can Cause Serious Damage, and Patients May Be Harmed or Become Distressed From the Resulting Confusion

Lesson 3: Leading Scientific, Patient-Oriented, and Disease-Oriented Organizations Must Scrupulously Avoid Conflict of Interest

Author Affiliations: Departments of Preventive Medicine and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Dr Greenland is Editor, Archives of Internal Medicine.


RELATED ARTICLE

Controversies Surround Heart Drug Study: Questions About Vytorin and Trial Sponsors' Conduct
Mike Mitka
JAMA. 2008;299(8):885-887.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surrogate End Points and FDA Approval: A Tale of 2 Lipid-Altering Drugs
Psaty and Lumley
JAMA 2008;299:1474-1476.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.